Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Brome Hay
in Garysburg, North Carolina

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Brome hay serving Garysburg.

Request Brome Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint8,746.6 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth67.3 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence88.1 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty47.9 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal49.5 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Garysburg, but it does not measure how much is specifically Brome hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 8,747 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 47th percentile among 6,984 analyzed North Carolina localities and the 66th percentile nationally. Northampton County reports 296 acres of reported hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Kenbridge, Virginia, 47 miles away with 28,562 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 97.8% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 47th percentile among analyzed North Carolina localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Brome hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

88.1 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 8,188 acres · 35th regional percentile · 50th national percentile2009: 6,977 acres · 43rd regional percentile · 51st national percentile2010: 5,564 acres · 32nd regional percentile · 55th national percentile2011: 4,770 acres · 30th regional percentile · 54th national percentile2012: 5,204 acres · 22nd regional percentile · 52nd national percentile2013: 6,240 acres · 21st regional percentile · 44th national percentile2014: 6,328 acres · 22nd regional percentile · 42nd national percentile2015: 7,374 acres · 26th regional percentile · 49th national percentile2016: 7,058 acres · 25th regional percentile · 48th national percentile2017: 6,424 acres · 21st regional percentile · 43rd national percentile2018: 6,733 acres · 22nd regional percentile · 38th national percentile2019: 10,606 acres · 28th regional percentile · 46th national percentile2020: 11,458 acres · 29th regional percentile · 47th national percentile2021: 10,065 acres · 32nd regional percentile · 49th national percentile2022: 9,103 acres · 31st regional percentile · 47th national percentile2023: 9,699 acres · 31st regional percentile · 48th national percentile2024: 527 acres · 57th regional percentile · 58th national percentile2025: 8,747 acres · 47th regional percentile · 66th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

67.3production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
359 head

Northampton County · 2022

How calculated

Northampton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37131:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
359 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5926aa16313cc8071e9485045117
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
633 head

Northampton County · 2022

How calculated

Northampton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37131:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
633 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b88adbca535766e243708a68036c
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
- head

Northampton County · 2022

How calculated

Northampton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37131:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:63e9cf4cf3234bced99d2ec9c4df
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
11 head

Northampton County · 2022

How calculated

Northampton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37131:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
11 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2cdacf04f8442ffaab21a260ee07
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.4 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Northampton County · 2022

How calculated

Northampton County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37131:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:52c0f0a6441d393a25964b19b717
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
134 head

Northampton County · 2022

How calculated

Northampton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37131:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
134 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a8403fb6032c78b1b49de80e661d
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
296 acres

Northampton County · 2022

How calculated

Northampton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37131:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
296 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ab8e0fe644c7da986004510f8046
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
11 farms

Northampton County · 2022

How calculated

Northampton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37131:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
11 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5a9e797c20d7595d1aeb87d42d84
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
- acres

Northampton County · 2022

How calculated

Northampton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37131:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:72e88966bd7ce0fb3cab81085b52
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
- farms

Northampton County · 2022

How calculated

Northampton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37131:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:86043f1c90611118c87236b613fd
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
260 tons

Northampton County · 2022

How calculated

Northampton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37131:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
260 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:31c93ed6cf3d962b77f361bef6bf
Official record
Open source ↗
Reported YieldHISTORICAL
0.9 tons/acre

Northampton County · 2022

How calculated

Northampton County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
37131:hay:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:fc310ec8be0e1a0bbe7daffca724
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Brome benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation49.5 in
How calculated

ROANOKE RAPIDS, NC US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3c903092e12867deffff623233dd
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature59.5 °F
How calculated

ROANOKE RAPIDS, NC US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b84c861727490c3947313fd34a5a
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance6.5 miles
How calculated

ROANOKE RAPIDS, NC US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Garysburg reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f0e0fa3d3eea3ddd39d0c06103cb
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Garysburg · 2026

How calculated

Garysburg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:28547c7dcc874d29a1e4fb40c626
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
97.8 percent

Garysburg · 2026

How calculated

Garysburg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:602ccfb7aa4d2e530f28dbfd2bb7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
14.1 percent

Garysburg · 2026

How calculated

Garysburg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c77715b91aad89ccbba8ee603081
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D2 category

Garysburg · 2026

How calculated

Garysburg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3c706d77b3793f801953dc6ddd7b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
62.4 0-100

Garysburg · 2026

How calculated

Garysburg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b90bd640493297f2e63b58ff96f2
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Garysburg · 2026

How calculated

Garysburg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1429164f484f084fbc66594c5731
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
35 weeks

Garysburg · 2026

How calculated

Garysburg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:68e86f3a10fc8c939d465e0c4de9
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
63.6 0-100

Garysburg · 2026

How calculated

Garysburg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6b424b53c3c7e2529cd0c8e40ca2
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
62.1 0-100

Garysburg · 2026

How calculated

Garysburg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1f6c2adc9f1abd56a94904fcaee5
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
41.4 0-100

Garysburg · 2026

How calculated

Garysburg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8c4a7939c49dbba811e1c4f1cf2a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
81 percent

Garysburg · 2026

How calculated

Garysburg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b5f059265b58592459794e3ae4c4
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
57.2 percent

Garysburg · 2026

How calculated

Garysburg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:2a6796d13601fdb4
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5787df1d41954ec7d4e4175c277d
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

47.9sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Brome Hay in Garysburg?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Brome Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Brome Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 63 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.