Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Brome Hay
in Barker, New York

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Brome hay serving Barker.

Request Brome Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint15,006.8 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth79.8 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence78.6 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty41.5 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal37.9 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Barker, but it does not measure how much is specifically Brome hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 15,007 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 75th percentile among 11,637 analyzed New York localities and the 87th percentile nationally. Niagara County reports 9,173 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Elma Center, New York, 35 miles away with 22,363 mapped acres. HayQuotes has not yet stored enough recent marketplace observations here to publish supplier liquidity, so quote requests are the check for bale format, freight, timing, and availability.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 75th percentile among analyzed New York localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Brome hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

78.6 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 17,387 acres · 33rd regional percentile · 64th national percentile2009: 13,450 acres · 33rd regional percentile · 64th national percentile2010: 69,474 acres · 36th regional percentile · 87th national percentile2011: 53,734 acres · 35th regional percentile · 85th national percentile2012: 55,922 acres · 38th regional percentile · 85th national percentile2013: 25,789 acres · 37th regional percentile · 73rd national percentile2014: 24,608 acres · 35th regional percentile · 69th national percentile2015: 21,426 acres · 34th regional percentile · 68th national percentile2016: 20,548 acres · 34th regional percentile · 68th national percentile2017: 24,217 acres · 34th regional percentile · 66th national percentile2018: 25,628 acres · 34th regional percentile · 63rd national percentile2019: 21,451 acres · 33rd regional percentile · 60th national percentile2020: 22,399 acres · 34th regional percentile · 60th national percentile2021: 18,927 acres · 37th regional percentile · 63rd national percentile2022: 17,243 acres · 37th regional percentile · 60th national percentile2023: 18,715 acres · 41st regional percentile · 62nd national percentile2024: 5,150 acres · 79th regional percentile · 89th national percentile2025: 15,007 acres · 75th regional percentile · 87th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

79.8production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
1,366 head

Niagara County · 2022

How calculated

Niagara County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
36063:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,366 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8178816efd48261a549c5885fe8a
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
20,152 head

Niagara County · 2022

How calculated

Niagara County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
36063:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
20,152 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:580367526cc1eda3bfdb585bc242
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
9,462 head

Niagara County · 2022

How calculated

Niagara County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
36063:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
9,462 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bb9ee9cef8fc231f9b3e81771504
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
1,123 head

Niagara County · 2022

How calculated

Niagara County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
36063:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,123 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4b9e2805c5809c210887ba01a0e6
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.6 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Niagara County · 2022

How calculated

Niagara County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
36063:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a4c0faddfaab6981e2c7cde26f1d
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
214 head

Niagara County · 2022

How calculated

Niagara County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
36063:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
214 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:436e30bd22a0408d185b8676980b
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
13,941 acres

Niagara County · 2022

How calculated

Niagara County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
36063:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
13,941 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:473809c801153ebaa00e1295ca76
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
205 farms

Niagara County · 2022

How calculated

Niagara County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
36063:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
205 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:067742f8e139c0b00254c16bba72
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
209 acres

Niagara County · 2022

How calculated

Niagara County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
36063:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
209 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9ff1b142e47c10e49121a1c3769e
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
12 farms

Niagara County · 2022

How calculated

Niagara County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
36063:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
12 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d77a15c4dac52d1fdb7a26aa4ab9
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
1.5 percent

Niagara County · 2022

How calculated

Niagara County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
36063:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:86eefe77419f1997100d881109c8
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
28,252 tons

Niagara County · 2022

How calculated

Niagara County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
36063:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
28,252 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:cc867b3e4849ba2f464bf0423285
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Brome benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation37.9 in
How calculated

LOCKPORT 4E, NY US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a92f03ddcfe76b3218252390d54d
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature49.1 °F
How calculated

LOCKPORT 4E, NY US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4a5c2bb51c37e62cb4bbb0b08b9a
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance10.1 miles
How calculated

LOCKPORT 4E, NY US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Barker reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0d19b6164ef4e81131bfcc0bc3b3
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Barker · 2026

How calculated

Barker · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:08584a2765eda667
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:254f89d7882159fc38434f1db7bb
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Barker · 2026

How calculated

Barker · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:08584a2765eda667
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:43f362a8cb84c247f017ba602679
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Barker · 2026

How calculated

Barker · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:08584a2765eda667
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:63718373976801a37adeef26a7ad
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
NONE category

Barker · 2026

How calculated

Barker · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:08584a2765eda667
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ef3210dd3626bde183b5b1effbaf
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
0 0-100

Barker · 2026

How calculated

Barker · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:08584a2765eda667
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:02fbf74bd5b01c8719025208b847
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Barker · 2026

How calculated

Barker · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:08584a2765eda667
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:01bd03e6f221af0099e79444df77
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
11 weeks

Barker · 2026

How calculated

Barker · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:08584a2765eda667
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:08b8ddcb7a2bbae63553a953b78d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Barker · 2026

How calculated

Barker · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:08584a2765eda667
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:df6be4248a73d85a5cf4ee25f320
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Barker · 2026

How calculated

Barker · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:08584a2765eda667
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5709ed10a21869c04fc13784cac8
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Barker · 2026

How calculated

Barker · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:08584a2765eda667
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:42ea41c4b57c595ebae1b3479d8b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
20.8 percent

Barker · 2026

How calculated

Barker · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:08584a2765eda667
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:fda3827ff83aadbe252b093125b0
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
8.2 percent

Barker · 2026

How calculated

Barker · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:08584a2765eda667
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d6eae466d71d01f2da91e1bcc8c9
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

41.5sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Brome Hay in Barker?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Brome Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Brome Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 66 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.