HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Brome Hay
in Bunker, Missouri

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Brome hay serving Bunker.

Request Brome Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint2,336 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth38.4 / 100LOW

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence70.8 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty62.5 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal49.1 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Brome Hay Quotes Sell Brome Near Bunker
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Bunker, but it does not measure how much is specifically Brome hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 2,336 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 4th percentile among 9,729 analyzed Missouri localities and the 23rd percentile nationally. Dent County reports 18,787 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Weingarten, Missouri, 62 miles away with 18,574 mapped acres. HayQuotes has not yet stored enough recent marketplace observations here to publish supplier liquidity, so quote requests are the check for bale format, freight, timing, and availability.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyLIMITED
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 4th percentile among analyzed Missouri localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Brome hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY
Within 25 miles2,336mapped acres · 0.186% of radius · 2025

4th percentile among 9,729 analyzed Missouri localities · 23th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Bunker · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
10504
Evidence
FAMILY
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
10504 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:78cdd7afff0cbea1c906fdfe3295
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

70.8 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 5,777 acres · 15th regional percentile · 45th national percentile2009: 2,441 acres · 11th regional percentile · 35th national percentile2010: 0 acres · 67th regional percentile · 19th national percentile2011: 0 acres · 70th regional percentile · 34th national percentile2012: 1,563 acres · 10th regional percentile · 38th national percentile2013: 2,230 acres · 10th regional percentile · 30th national percentile2014: 2,596 acres · 12th regional percentile · 30th national percentile2015: 1,659 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 26th national percentile2016: 2,748 acres · 7th regional percentile · 32nd national percentile2017: 2,094 acres · 6th regional percentile · 23rd national percentile2018: 3,553 acres · 7th regional percentile · 26th national percentile2019: 5,299 acres · 9th regional percentile · 32nd national percentile2020: 4,977 acres · 7th regional percentile · 31st national percentile2021: 3,463 acres · 9th regional percentile · 30th national percentile2022: 3,515 acres · 8th regional percentile · 30th national percentile2023: 2,752 acres · 9th regional percentile · 27th national percentile2024: 0 acres · 0th regional percentile · 2nd national percentile2025: 2,336 acres · 4th regional percentile · 23rd national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

38.4production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
23,024 head

Dent County · 2022

How calculated

Dent County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29065:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
23,024 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:025d88a6e330117ca2d4eefdd76c
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
39,002 head

Dent County · 2022

How calculated

Dent County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29065:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
39,002 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4e55607188ec59330929e36dc9e8
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
31 head

Dent County · 2022

How calculated

Dent County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29065:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
31 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0de4060ae758103126939c16c608
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
689 head

Dent County · 2022

How calculated

Dent County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29065:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
689 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:46c4a8343ee6f07aa7e205b58d84
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.5 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Dent County · 2022

How calculated

Dent County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29065:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:99bf9e71017257b0c25f1aa8a45d
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
1,126 head

Dent County · 2022

How calculated

Dent County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29065:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,126 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a5b872f9fbbfd158a2d4c3ecf09d
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
19,628 acres

Dent County · 2022

How calculated

Dent County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29065:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
19,628 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:515fad713f0632ff52147d19f07a
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
275 farms

Dent County · 2022

How calculated

Dent County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29065:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
275 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:edc746d3d60517996ca98c7d3516
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
352 acres

Dent County · 2022

How calculated

Dent County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29065:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
352 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:23295010909a4eeb3d5f8d2122c6
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
5 farms

Dent County · 2022

How calculated

Dent County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29065:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
5 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0078b7b6e31e33d842e62662b506
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
1.8 percent

Dent County · 2022

How calculated

Dent County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29065:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6387c75e44682aded14d62cf3761
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
43,000 tons

Dent County · 2022

How calculated

Dent County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29065:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
43,000 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2e0d382375210f70b1d0111adf10
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Brome benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation49.2 in
How calculated

ROUND SPRING 2SW, MO US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4706c3e9562b7dead802953aa837
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature55.3 °F
How calculated

ROUND SPRING 2SW, MO US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:fa0752bdc0c3b74d8fae22fd9157
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance18.1 miles
How calculated

ROUND SPRING 2SW, MO US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Bunker reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7e2892e2f4a886398b7eefb5a194
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
0.4 percent

Bunker · 2026

How calculated

Bunker · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:264df21d0530ba91f57a589cc9de
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Bunker · 2026

How calculated

Bunker · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:69887308ca3198f8d8a73be4fbdd
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Bunker · 2026

How calculated

Bunker · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7de045e5917dd80a9961f2ca2fa0
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
NONE category

Bunker · 2026

How calculated

Bunker · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d643f4ceb03ea7f7112b7f5d88d6
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
5 0-100

Bunker · 2026

How calculated

Bunker · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:197d507e1d972c053cec2f4e6162
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Bunker · 2026

How calculated

Bunker · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d6e4cc172229a925ba3cab856e94
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
9 weeks

Bunker · 2026

How calculated

Bunker · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2e7cefb10f526b485d2dbce2feaa
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
4.2 0-100

Bunker · 2026

How calculated

Bunker · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1ffaa10293fa4fe3bfe541f1a897
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
42.7 0-100

Bunker · 2026

How calculated

Bunker · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:cb2d49f0a44df7fa28749ed9d0bf
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Bunker · 2026

How calculated

Bunker · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b16c5503c881d026ff130edb9f89
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
23.5 percent

Bunker · 2026

How calculated

Bunker · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d746a7240c4804c27f642691234d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
2.6 percent

Bunker · 2026

How calculated

Bunker · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4afa0d32262fc731e74b29332a9b
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

62.5sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Brome Hay in Weingarten, Missouri62 mi18,574 ac96.92. Brome Hay in Grayhawk, Missouri62.1 mi17,544 ac92.73. Brome Hay in Goose Creek Lake, Missouri60.1 mi15,548 ac84.84. Brome Hay in Olympian Village, Missouri62.3 mi14,109 ac78.95. Brome Hay in Mine La Motte, Missouri51.3 mi13,616 ac77.46. Brome Hay in Farmington, Missouri48.4 mi13,179 ac75.87. Brome Hay in Knob Lick, Missouri48.7 mi12,985 ac758. Brome Hay in Leadington, Missouri47.7 mi12,411 ac72.79. Brome Hay in St. Clair, Missouri62.6 mi12,574 ac72.610. Brome Hay in Charmwood, Missouri57.2 mi12,319 ac71.9
Source hay

Need Brome Hay in Bunker?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Brome Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Brome Hay markets in Dent CountycountyBrome Hay markets in Reynolds Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Bunker

Alfalfa Hay in Bunker, MissouriExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Bunker, MissouriContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Bunker, MissouriContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Bunker, MissouriContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Bunker, MissouriContextual local forage evidence in this localityGrass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Bunker, MissouriContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Brome Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 85 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.