Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Brome Hay
in Mount Pleasant, Arkansas

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Brome hay serving Mount Pleasant.

Request Brome Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint1,790.9 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth39.7 / 100LOW

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence51.3 / 100MODERATE
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty61.3 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal50.5 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Mount Pleasant, but it does not measure how much is specifically Brome hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 1,791 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 17th percentile among 5,634 analyzed Arkansas localities and the 20th percentile nationally. Izard County reports 23,595 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Walnut Ridge, Arkansas, 47 miles away with 11,272 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 37.8% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyLIMITED
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 17th percentile among analyzed Arkansas localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Brome hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

51.3 / 100 persistence · MODERATE

2008: 6,027 acres · 64th regional percentile · 46th national percentile2009: 8,837 acres · 76th regional percentile · 56th national percentile2010: 0 acres · 87th regional percentile · 19th national percentile2011: 0 acres · 92nd regional percentile · 34th national percentile2012: 0 acres · 73rd regional percentile · 19th national percentile2013: 0 acres · 67th regional percentile · 5th national percentile2014: 0 acres · 63rd regional percentile · 4th national percentile2015: 3,361 acres · 32nd regional percentile · 36th national percentile2016: 5,780 acres · 62nd regional percentile · 45th national percentile2017: 6,004 acres · 47th regional percentile · 41st national percentile2018: 8,642 acres · 57th regional percentile · 43rd national percentile2019: 9,850 acres · 59th regional percentile · 44th national percentile2020: 9,000 acres · 55th regional percentile · 42nd national percentile2021: 5,020 acres · 46th regional percentile · 36th national percentile2022: 4,018 acres · 40th regional percentile · 32nd national percentile2023: 3,133 acres · 34th regional percentile · 29th national percentile2024: 122 acres · 54th regional percentile · 34th national percentile2025: 1,791 acres · 17th regional percentile · 20th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

39.7production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Izard County · 2022

How calculated

Izard County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05065:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1bb8345a02d80d133edf7e5cd05f
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
33,361 head

Izard County · 2022

How calculated

Izard County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05065:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
33,361 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f5973d1fab4f20cb4b7873a25737
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Izard County · 2022

How calculated

Izard County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05065:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:cf8e51d783d691abbe3b4c974f8d
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
481 head

Izard County · 2022

How calculated

Izard County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05065:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
481 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d95dc6d8d42fd2f3cc5c7e6895e1
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.7 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Izard County · 2022

How calculated

Izard County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05065:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:197bb7c1440809052bb172475877
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
844 head

Izard County · 2022

How calculated

Izard County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05065:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
844 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8287c329688e390f835ec6021574
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
23,595 acres

Izard County · 2022

How calculated

Izard County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05065:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
23,595 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:130a8dfac9a4ac10f2d66693f8ab
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
272 farms

Izard County · 2022

How calculated

Izard County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05065:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
272 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:fbf3aeedb23b79647dab7cde6449
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
(D) acres

Izard County · 2022

How calculated

Izard County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05065:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a76ef1d576c6ac08a9812c3d3258
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
3 farms

Izard County · 2022

How calculated

Izard County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05065:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c8b55deb1f27f6cec2f3a486d0fb
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
35,880 tons

Izard County · 2022

How calculated

Izard County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05065:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
35,880 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7d66ff9818648814514f4fa39a5a
Official record
Open source ↗
Reported YieldHISTORICAL
1.5 tons/acre

Izard County · 2022

How calculated

Izard County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05065:hay:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:00c76c9d39895f8aa0f9125764a3
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Brome benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation50.6 in
How calculated

BATESVILLE LVSTK, AR US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c025509cc43012d189343458d2be
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature57.3 °F
How calculated

BATESVILLE LVSTK, AR US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d5be26eb03841c2e06d299974fa4
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance10.5 miles
How calculated

BATESVILLE LVSTK, AR US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Mount Pleasant reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3b4ce2cc2c3d21e354cbc10b9618
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Mount Pleasant · 2026

How calculated

Mount Pleasant · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5b25485cf6e334a5475b6a1e8df7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
37.8 percent

Mount Pleasant · 2026

How calculated

Mount Pleasant · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:95a06eb8504df83d0e95c818325c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
17.3 percent

Mount Pleasant · 2026

How calculated

Mount Pleasant · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:38d05417ff1d142cf9355b22f0ff
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D1 category

Mount Pleasant · 2026

How calculated

Mount Pleasant · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:732f2fcb6d038c649374d06d6c56
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
51 0-100

Mount Pleasant · 2026

How calculated

Mount Pleasant · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3132da69061ca1ba821d052d0555
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Mount Pleasant · 2026

How calculated

Mount Pleasant · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:84116ff4586560d64100cc704e83
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
45 weeks

Mount Pleasant · 2026

How calculated

Mount Pleasant · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:88d997c723fa0214505daea10b06
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
73.2 0-100

Mount Pleasant · 2026

How calculated

Mount Pleasant · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a0c924559d88dca189e598c40ebd
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
96 0-100

Mount Pleasant · 2026

How calculated

Mount Pleasant · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:564908270ddbdf066999779a2a61
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
39.8 0-100

Mount Pleasant · 2026

How calculated

Mount Pleasant · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f058da2c986738fcd9d5deaf5537
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
95.2 percent

Mount Pleasant · 2026

How calculated

Mount Pleasant · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b38c6917e279a2ccd02e33ed3780
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
83.2 percent

Mount Pleasant · 2026

How calculated

Mount Pleasant · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:74eec319ddeab7d6e874f68f942e
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

61.3sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Brome Hay in Mount Pleasant?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Brome Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Brome Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 64 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.