HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Brome Hay
in Bylas, Arizona

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Brome hay serving Bylas.

Request Brome Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint1,327.9 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth76.3 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence61.4 / 100MODERATE
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty41.8 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal10.2 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Brome Hay Quotes Sell Brome Near Bylas
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Bylas, but it does not measure how much is specifically Brome hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 1,328 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 78th percentile among 4,203 analyzed Arizona localities and the 16th percentile nationally. Graham County reports 1,765 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Cactus Forest, Arizona, 71 miles away with 3,016 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 23.6% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 78th percentile among analyzed Arizona localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Brome hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY
Within 25 miles1,328mapped acres · 0.106% of radius · 2025

78th percentile among 4,203 analyzed Arizona localities · 16th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Bylas · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
5971
Evidence
FAMILY
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
5971 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ddeaebb59f6de01a8ed357cc54c1
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

61.4 / 100 persistence · MODERATE

2008: 14 acres · 58th regional percentile · 4th national percentile2009: 24 acres · 60th regional percentile · 5th national percentile2010: 64 acres · 61st regional percentile · 23rd national percentile2011: 0 acres · 91st regional percentile · 34th national percentile2012: 129 acres · 69th regional percentile · 23rd national percentile2013: 80 acres · 65th regional percentile · 11th national percentile2014: 154 acres · 64th regional percentile · 11th national percentile2015: 7 acres · 48th regional percentile · 2nd national percentile2016: 159 acres · 69th regional percentile · 8th national percentile2017: 35 acres · 55th regional percentile · 4th national percentile2018: 309 acres · 70th regional percentile · 7th national percentile2019: 482 acres · 75th regional percentile · 8th national percentile2020: 599 acres · 75th regional percentile · 9th national percentile2021: 330 acres · 72nd regional percentile · 7th national percentile2022: 268 acres · 67th regional percentile · 6th national percentile2023: 274 acres · 69th regional percentile · 6th national percentile2024: 365 acres · 74th regional percentile · 53rd national percentile2025: 1,328 acres · 78th regional percentile · 16th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

76.3production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
9,089 head

Graham County · 2022

How calculated

Graham County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
04009:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
9,089 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5fb2fee0ae2620d55a03dce2883e
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
15,201 head

Graham County · 2022

How calculated

Graham County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
04009:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
15,201 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1e40cd180e151e82e4ae3f9e2ce6
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
5 head

Graham County · 2022

How calculated

Graham County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
04009:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
5 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:621c59b2a31c6c7363fe81dfb563
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
1,289 head

Graham County · 2022

How calculated

Graham County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
04009:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,289 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f1c253cc4e771732c04b01710af4
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.3 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Graham County · 2022

How calculated

Graham County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
04009:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bf88283cd1b268b6416ae7067215
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
180 head

Graham County · 2022

How calculated

Graham County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
04009:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
180 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:88da0d58d97428489b92d8e7c7f3
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
5,026 acres

Graham County · 2022

How calculated

Graham County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
04009:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
5,026 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:fb946dcf415b000f7c56ebf76e39
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
97 farms

Graham County · 2022

How calculated

Graham County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
04009:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
97 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:db0222f6b3ea48fc852b5192cff9
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
5,026 acres

Graham County · 2022

How calculated

Graham County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
04009:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
5,026 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:92520f5e769a83a092a9ae03a9d4
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
97 farms

Graham County · 2022

How calculated

Graham County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
04009:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
97 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e558376853a1f7c093822ea0442c
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
100 percent

Graham County · 2022

How calculated

Graham County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
04009:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bf187b48ea28e82ea4367e243022
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
21,629 tons

Graham County · 2022

How calculated

Graham County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
04009:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
21,629 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:fc0fac779799fe3c614b6424d6a4
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Brome benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation10.2 in
How calculated

FT THOMAS 2 SW, AZ US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:086fe84f89ee3ffc2d6b824e3fed
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature64.5 °F
How calculated

FT THOMAS 2 SW, AZ US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:018fa877bb02496d89bd04597393
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance11.1 miles
How calculated

FT THOMAS 2 SW, AZ US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Bylas reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8e3ebbb37f9ba8f9339a5cfa9640
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
56.9 percent

Bylas · 2026

How calculated

Bylas · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7d6a31d8a48ef083
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4b0088453f239b815e76e139c480
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
23.6 percent

Bylas · 2026

How calculated

Bylas · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7d6a31d8a48ef083
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d3f419157791c0940c2e4cda39b0
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Bylas · 2026

How calculated

Bylas · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7d6a31d8a48ef083
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:099fff795f16a78be968fb5e0ec3
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D1 category

Bylas · 2026

How calculated

Bylas · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7d6a31d8a48ef083
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:cb3b8bc4858b3052d5783054e686
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
35.6 0-100

Bylas · 2026

How calculated

Bylas · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7d6a31d8a48ef083
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c37d1a89e56af96d46926ff10b97
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Bylas · 2026

How calculated

Bylas · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7d6a31d8a48ef083
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:42fba2ec545053e277de8ea92a41
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
53 weeks

Bylas · 2026

How calculated

Bylas · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7d6a31d8a48ef083
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:32dfe1dbb4b8103e6b4985118e10
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
44.5 0-100

Bylas · 2026

How calculated

Bylas · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7d6a31d8a48ef083
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:676c62cc58e16662bb76fdc179d3
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
32.6 0-100

Bylas · 2026

How calculated

Bylas · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7d6a31d8a48ef083
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:822bb6ae696e182a37445daa76a8
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
40.2 0-100

Bylas · 2026

How calculated

Bylas · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7d6a31d8a48ef083
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:205e7af6f6ae742177eda75df825
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
83.2 percent

Bylas · 2026

How calculated

Bylas · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7d6a31d8a48ef083
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:bc7a60fc01d232904628b379f406
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
46.4 percent

Bylas · 2026

How calculated

Bylas · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7d6a31d8a48ef083
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a95f2333a82d8931366834d3a92d
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

41.8sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Brome Hay in Cactus Forest, Arizona70.6 mi3,016 ac96.52. Brome Hay in Florence, Arizona75.3 mi2,681 ac87.93. Brome Hay in Gold Canyon, Arizona77.3 mi2,222 ac76.44. Brome Hay in Queen Valley, Arizona69.6 mi1,931 ac69.55. Brome Hay in Superior, Arizona59.2 mi1,836 ac67.76. Brome Hay in San Jose, Arizona37 mi1,664 ac64.57. Brome Hay in Bryce, Arizona21.9 mi1,504 ac61.38. Brome Hay in Pima, Arizona22.6 mi1,493 ac619. Brome Hay in Fort Thomas, Arizona11.1 mi1,445 ac60.410. Brome Hay in Central, Arizona25.9 mi1,476 ac60.4
Source hay

Need Brome Hay in Bylas?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Brome Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Brome Hay markets in Graham Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Bylas

Alfalfa Hay in Bylas, ArizonaExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Bylas, ArizonaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Bylas, ArizonaContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Bylas, ArizonaContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Bylas, ArizonaContextual local forage evidence in this localityGrass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Bylas, ArizonaContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Brome Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 66 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.