Non-alfalfa hay
Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04
Bermudagrass Hay
in Chelsea, Wisconsin
Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Bermudagrass hay serving Chelsea.
Request Bermudagrass Hay Quotes
Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.
Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.
Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.
Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.
Local interpretation
What the local hay data shows
USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Chelsea, but it does not measure how much is specifically Bermudagrass hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 35,569 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 97th percentile among 7,272 analyzed Wisconsin localities and the 99th percentile nationally. Taylor County reports 18,293 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Stratford, Wisconsin, 36 miles away with 55,633 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 100% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.
Buyer decision panel
What the evidence says now
Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED
Chelsea ranks among the strongest persistent mapped non-alfalfa hay footprints in Wisconsin.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
- usda-cdl-2008-30m
- usda-cdl-2009-30m
- usda-cdl-2010-30m
- usda-cdl-2011-30m
- usda-cdl-2012-30m
- usda-cdl-2013-30m
- usda-cdl-2014-30m
- usda-cdl-2015-30m
- usda-cdl-2016-30m
- usda-cdl-2017-30m
- usda-cdl-2018-30m
- usda-cdl-2019-30m
- usda-cdl-2020-30m
- usda-cdl-2021-30m
- usda-cdl-2022-30m
- usda-cdl-2023-30m
- usda-cdl-2024-30m
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Bermudagrass hay.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map
Local non-alfalfa hay footprint
Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.
5 mi
1,424 ac
10 mi
5,476 ac
25 mi
35,569 ac
50 mi
109,189 ac
100 mi
247,306 ac
150 mi
429,614 ac
250 mi
890,370 ac
Within 25 miles35,569mapped acres · 2.831% of radius · 2025
97th percentile among 7,272 analyzed Wisconsin localities · 99th percentile nationally.
How calculated
Chelsea · radius
Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.
- Source
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
- Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174- Source record
159938- Evidence
- FAMILY
- Period
- 2025-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 159938 classified pixels
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:5f7b029e36025ae24cf202326ee6- Official record
- Open source ↗
Footprint history
83.8 / 100 persistence · HIGH
20082025
Agricultural census
Production & livestock context
The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.
93.5production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
5,077 headTaylor County · 2022
How calculated
Taylor County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
55119:beef_cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 5,077 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:a1fa2569e3c2806b9882e38d4fd9- Official record
- Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
39,963 headTaylor County · 2022
How calculated
Taylor County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
55119:cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 39,963 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:f958783358ec7d9f237c3b2b653d- Official record
- Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
16,174 headTaylor County · 2022
How calculated
Taylor County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
55119:dairy_cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 16,174 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:5e6effb13b93cf37bb130890f0b9- Official record
- Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
877 headTaylor County · 2022
How calculated
Taylor County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
55119:equine:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 877 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:b25557a1b70f02fc644c3d756d01- Official record
- Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.8 reported_hay_acres/reported_headTaylor County · 2022
How calculated
Taylor County · county
Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
55119:forage-production-livestock-context:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- reported_hay_acres/reported_head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:489cdb0d93a52325db76e2412cf8- Official record
- Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
319 headTaylor County · 2022
How calculated
Taylor County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
55119:goats:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 319 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:4932d15849dc1b47b05779efa28d- Official record
- Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
32,004 acresTaylor County · 2022
How calculated
Taylor County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
55119:hay_acres:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 32,004 acres
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:937310c0d4d9b5d570b00a8d66f1- Official record
- Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
434 farmsTaylor County · 2022
How calculated
Taylor County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
55119:hay_farms:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 434 farms
- Normalized unit
- farms
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:780af540af7fe60a4abfafb433b1- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
60 acresTaylor County · 2022
How calculated
Taylor County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
55119:hay_irrigated_acres:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 60 acres
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:34c0d2393b898f3eccd293930384- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
4 farmsTaylor County · 2022
How calculated
Taylor County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
55119:hay_irrigated_farms:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 4 farms
- Normalized unit
- farms
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:888a71ed32b98b86c1f965260eeb- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
0.2 percentTaylor County · 2022
How calculated
Taylor County · county
Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
55119:hay:irrigated-share:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:5f817027917633f401b280f38b9c- Official record
- Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
80,555 tonsTaylor County · 2022
How calculated
Taylor County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
55119:hay_production:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 80,555 tons
- Normalized unit
- tons
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:4c85c25c02621cbb92212225f92c- Official record
- Open source ↗
Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.
Comparable market observations
Price intelligence
No defensible Bermudagrass benchmark
No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.
Request current local quotes →Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.
Official 1991–2020 normals
Local climate context
Annual precipitation34.2 in
How calculated
MEDFORD, WI US · nearest station
Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- in
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:0d048ee38331f3820a64f697dcf7- Official record
- Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature41.8 °F
How calculated
MEDFORD, WI US · nearest station
Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- °F
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:629b894f476760485e2847fe7a49- Official record
- Open source ↗
Station distance11.4 miles
How calculated
MEDFORD, WI US · nearest station
Great-circle distance from Chelsea reference point to the official station.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- miles
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:6a48a03cbf8a0eb0f8554f7f0821- Official record
- Open source ↗
Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.
Environmental pressure
Drought & moisture context
Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percentChelsea · 2026
How calculated
Chelsea · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d- Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:ad0e33a1730f80c982d607827d41- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
100 percentChelsea · 2026
How calculated
Chelsea · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d- Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:dea4a6460c1d7ad6d05c645bf1f5- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percentChelsea · 2026
How calculated
Chelsea · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d- Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:8b9b1b10b7aed04bdf5f227acb9b- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D2 categoryChelsea · 2026
How calculated
Chelsea · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d- Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- category
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:5111f23224461a56278bcebe6d72- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
60 0-100Chelsea · 2026
How calculated
Chelsea · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d- Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:5c7cad516ece466bbe6699dbd3f2- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING categoryChelsea · 2026
How calculated
Chelsea · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d- Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- category
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:e5014d599875d045252bdc8318af- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
10 weeksChelsea · 2026
How calculated
Chelsea · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d- Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- weeks
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:260e3f3665bbf7988c6ba16206a0- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
20 0-100Chelsea · 2026
How calculated
Chelsea · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d- Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-06-09
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:87b6ddf20266c1fba90361d4d2be- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
20 0-100Chelsea · 2026
How calculated
Chelsea · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d- Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-03-03
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:c65a23f3c53447aecb9b4684de2f- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
33 0-100Chelsea · 2026
How calculated
Chelsea · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d- Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-08-04
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:680a25f1e5b2e590f0a68060dff6- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
27.8 percentChelsea · 2026
How calculated
Chelsea · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d- Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:ac5e1ea849831af973426eabb101- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
3.8 percentChelsea · 2026
How calculated
Chelsea · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d- Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:219c6cedd307be1e63c1ae6688c7- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.
HayQuotes marketplace
Visible supply & verified demand
Coverage is still developing
No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.
Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool
Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine
No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.
Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes
Quote A
Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload
$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials
Quote B
Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload
$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials
Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph
Strong nearby sourcing candidates
Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.
34.4sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Bermudagrass Hay in Stratford, Wisconsin36.1 mi55,633 ac98.22. Bermudagrass Hay in Unity, Wisconsin30.5 mi54,542 ac973. Bermudagrass Hay in Colby, Wisconsin26.4 mi53,797 ac96.24. Bermudagrass Hay in Abbotsford, Wisconsin24.1 mi53,152 ac95.45. Bermudagrass Hay in Fenwood, Wisconsin32.7 mi53,285 ac95.26. Bermudagrass Hay in Curtiss, Wisconsin24.4 mi51,762 ac93.67. Bermudagrass Hay in Spencer, Wisconsin37.3 mi51,901 ac93.18. Bermudagrass Hay in Dorchester, Wisconsin20.2 mi51,086 ac92.99. Bermudagrass Hay in Edgar, Wisconsin30.5 mi48,853 ac89.310. Bermudagrass Hay in Stetsonville, Wisconsin14.9 mi47,873 ac88.8Source hay
Need Bermudagrass Hay in Chelsea?
Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.
Internal market pathways
Continue through the evidence graph
Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.
County and agricultural-region markets
Other strongly supported hay types in Chelsea
Alfalfa Hay in Chelsea, WisconsinExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Chelsea, WisconsinContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Chelsea, WisconsinContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Chelsea, WisconsinContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Chelsea, WisconsinContextual local forage evidence in this localityGrass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Chelsea, WisconsinContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail
Methodology & sources
This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.
NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence
EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.
Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Bermudagrass Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.
Generator: max-v1.0 · 65 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.