Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Bermudagrass Hay
in Mantua, Utah

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Bermudagrass hay serving Mantua.

Request Bermudagrass Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint14,977.2 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth84.6 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence72.5 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty39.2 / 100LOW

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal15.5 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Mantua, but it does not measure how much is specifically Bermudagrass hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 14,977 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 87th percentile among 3,006 analyzed Utah localities and the 87th percentile nationally. Box Elder County reports 12,804 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Plymouth, Utah, 28 miles away with 27,880 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 100% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 87th percentile among analyzed Utah localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Bermudagrass hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

72.5 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 14,213 acres · 80th regional percentile · 60th national percentile2009: 11,422 acres · 79th regional percentile · 61st national percentile2010: 26,730 acres · 92nd regional percentile · 74th national percentile2011: 0 acres · 87th regional percentile · 34th national percentile2012: 0 acres · 87th regional percentile · 19th national percentile2013: 27,988 acres · 83rd regional percentile · 74th national percentile2014: 34,603 acres · 83rd regional percentile · 77th national percentile2015: 22,400 acres · 83rd regional percentile · 69th national percentile2016: 27,124 acres · 85th regional percentile · 74th national percentile2017: 27,293 acres · 83rd regional percentile · 68th national percentile2018: 33,897 acres · 84th regional percentile · 70th national percentile2019: 40,238 acres · 87th regional percentile · 76th national percentile2020: 44,409 acres · 87th regional percentile · 77th national percentile2021: 40,775 acres · 84th regional percentile · 84th national percentile2022: 44,040 acres · 87th regional percentile · 85th national percentile2023: 45,488 acres · 86th regional percentile · 87th national percentile2024: 3,933 acres · 94th regional percentile · 86th national percentile2025: 14,977 acres · 87th regional percentile · 87th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

84.6production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
36,151 head

Box Elder County · 2022

How calculated

Box Elder County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49003:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
36,151 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bae781c6a5e00397a28352a20909
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
80,926 head

Box Elder County · 2022

How calculated

Box Elder County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49003:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
80,926 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bc4d5cdeece06ef5ca52ca8fdbad
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
8,099 head

Box Elder County · 2022

How calculated

Box Elder County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49003:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
8,099 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:aeb9d418a55ad638936ddd4842d5
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
3,050 head

Box Elder County · 2022

How calculated

Box Elder County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49003:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3,050 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:797cd074c2f689e133100c62d0e8
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.5 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Box Elder County · 2022

How calculated

Box Elder County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49003:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a0b7f6926459ad501ac17a7248a0
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
1,110 head

Box Elder County · 2022

How calculated

Box Elder County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49003:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,110 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5837391f129740bedd158362b7e7
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
58,611 acres

Box Elder County · 2022

How calculated

Box Elder County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49003:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
58,611 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:15ec1e26d553c8b7faf4823c92bd
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
626 farms

Box Elder County · 2022

How calculated

Box Elder County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49003:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
626 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0c6763c9655aab839d22b944e17a
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
46,481 acres

Box Elder County · 2022

How calculated

Box Elder County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49003:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
46,481 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2be51793995412c23e4c35ac8a3c
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
574 farms

Box Elder County · 2022

How calculated

Box Elder County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49003:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
574 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5643f11f0bde843e0eeb92db442a
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
79.3 percent

Box Elder County · 2022

How calculated

Box Elder County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49003:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:de49c06fe5fa5e0b1642a2f1938c
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
196,431 tons

Box Elder County · 2022

How calculated

Box Elder County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49003:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
196,431 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:14b1f9377310e061e45a93e767e8
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Bermudagrass benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation15.5 in
How calculated

BRIGHAM CITY WASTE PLT, UT US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:cd1aae0c93a82d2c0fd8e7422bfd
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature50.1 °F
How calculated

BRIGHAM CITY WASTE PLT, UT US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:70fa10ad1e44ab79889f9fee1f51
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance5.9 miles
How calculated

BRIGHAM CITY WASTE PLT, UT US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Mantua reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:351f6fa859a42c0c2221ffe7d649
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Mantua · 2026

How calculated

Mantua · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:88e2eaa72156b4064c4d5e53c0fc
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Mantua · 2026

How calculated

Mantua · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7f33d02c9556da94548782424bd8
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
32.4 percent

Mantua · 2026

How calculated

Mantua · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f6a3281ddac6f2974076412090f8
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D2 category

Mantua · 2026

How calculated

Mantua · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:cf33719b8074a71f0fd922c4c669
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
67.3 0-100

Mantua · 2026

How calculated

Mantua · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a5a536b88e9329f35c8f5830f132
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Mantua · 2026

How calculated

Mantua · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8fde9dd7f83c0ecee4fc2b6d9d7e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
53 weeks

Mantua · 2026

How calculated

Mantua · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5bb1a0ab7e2fa333ac74f537e7e8
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
63.2 0-100

Mantua · 2026

How calculated

Mantua · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:cd8384c71d72c992e8bd38c67a03
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
39.9 0-100

Mantua · 2026

How calculated

Mantua · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:80534db38a6766e20358313c6ad8
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
65.2 0-100

Mantua · 2026

How calculated

Mantua · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b662dc8d8cf34fd12bbe757f2408
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
99.8 percent

Mantua · 2026

How calculated

Mantua · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:193adb6e655a1c20170cdb102ea3
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
44.5 percent

Mantua · 2026

How calculated

Mantua · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:590aa62984b72c71567cefb6ecda
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

39.2sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Bermudagrass Hay in Mantua?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Bermudagrass Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Bermudagrass Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 66 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.