Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Bermudagrass Hay
in Chatsworth, Illinois

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Bermudagrass hay serving Chatsworth.

Request Bermudagrass Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint7,248.3 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth68.6 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence65 / 100MODERATE
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty45.4 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal44.4 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Chatsworth, but it does not measure how much is specifically Bermudagrass hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 7,248 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 62nd percentile among 13,149 analyzed Illinois localities and the 57th percentile nationally. Livingston County reports 853 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Verona, Illinois, 36 miles away with 9,391 mapped acres. HayQuotes has not yet stored enough recent marketplace observations here to publish supplier liquidity, so quote requests are the check for bale format, freight, timing, and availability.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 62nd percentile among analyzed Illinois localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Bermudagrass hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

65 / 100 persistence · MODERATE

2008: 96 acres · 5th regional percentile · 7th national percentile2009: 244 acres · 30th regional percentile · 13th national percentile2010: 309 acres · 11th regional percentile · 26th national percentile2011: 2,185 acres · 23rd regional percentile · 48th national percentile2012: 755 acres · 51st regional percentile · 31st national percentile2013: 468 acres · 30th regional percentile · 17th national percentile2014: 586 acres · 39th regional percentile · 17th national percentile2015: 603 acres · 45th regional percentile · 15th national percentile2016: 1,120 acres · 46th regional percentile · 19th national percentile2017: 1,971 acres · 45th regional percentile · 22nd national percentile2018: 3,575 acres · 66th regional percentile · 26th national percentile2019: 3,225 acres · 41st regional percentile · 24th national percentile2020: 2,118 acres · 29th regional percentile · 18th national percentile2021: 1,403 acres · 43rd regional percentile · 17th national percentile2022: 1,298 acres · 57th regional percentile · 17th national percentile2023: 1,011 acres · 41st regional percentile · 13th national percentile2024: 348 acres · 74th regional percentile · 52nd national percentile2025: 7,248 acres · 62nd regional percentile · 57th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

68.6production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
2,731 head

Livingston County · 2022

How calculated

Livingston County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
17105:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2,731 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f43346f447587dec20e8fecabc4d
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
10,647 head

Livingston County · 2022

How calculated

Livingston County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
17105:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
10,647 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7a8234d31c5cf7a0eeed65b41206
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
550 head

Livingston County · 2022

How calculated

Livingston County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
17105:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
550 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d0146da8fa2bd038d690af63b57b
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
199 head

Livingston County · 2022

How calculated

Livingston County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
17105:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
199 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b41fa863564b6b50d630139418f9
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.2 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Livingston County · 2022

How calculated

Livingston County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
17105:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f2a6734930350401bf0c8f07d914
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
345 head

Livingston County · 2022

How calculated

Livingston County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
17105:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
345 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9993618bb89f7cbe55d4c655f7f7
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
2,298 acres

Livingston County · 2022

How calculated

Livingston County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
17105:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2,298 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:cff414dbefbc15f1af39d31310cd
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
134 farms

Livingston County · 2022

How calculated

Livingston County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
17105:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
134 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:83708971e3a660a40064ea48c9d6
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
- acres

Livingston County · 2022

How calculated

Livingston County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
17105:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:45f08d9fc6f30f46b83c5f87d92b
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
- farms

Livingston County · 2022

How calculated

Livingston County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
17105:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ef74a0ccf796a25a8bacca24ed2a
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
7,211 tons

Livingston County · 2022

How calculated

Livingston County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
17105:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
7,211 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:521a40e2cc1f9bae6a0ae9a87cf1
Official record
Open source ↗
Reported YieldHISTORICAL
3.1 tons/acre

Livingston County · 2022

How calculated

Livingston County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
17105:hay:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f9274855987b74d5980c54880c8c
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Bermudagrass benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation44.4 in
How calculated

PIPER CITY, IL US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bdd9f169ff6fbb47bc601c0da210
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature51.9 °F
How calculated

PIPER CITY, IL US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8c6df7b2fd04638f75be805a57a2
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance6.6 miles
How calculated

PIPER CITY, IL US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Chatsworth reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b697256b11dc13c78bfc0dcc789f
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Chatsworth · 2026

How calculated

Chatsworth · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fc8517b99d5c7edb
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5dfa756b009fbe5e359d7035d460
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Chatsworth · 2026

How calculated

Chatsworth · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fc8517b99d5c7edb
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2d494b1402d0dccd1b74776cca17
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Chatsworth · 2026

How calculated

Chatsworth · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fc8517b99d5c7edb
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:140569fa198a53d7b71c0d5a5513
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
NONE category

Chatsworth · 2026

How calculated

Chatsworth · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fc8517b99d5c7edb
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:04208b3875a150076249c761a908
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
0 0-100

Chatsworth · 2026

How calculated

Chatsworth · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fc8517b99d5c7edb
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a34c126c1970ed44235049842071
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
IMPROVING category

Chatsworth · 2026

How calculated

Chatsworth · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fc8517b99d5c7edb
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8b503573a6ca5e76a4c1125fd472
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
27 weeks

Chatsworth · 2026

How calculated

Chatsworth · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fc8517b99d5c7edb
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:eade12d27fc51b60f2f6f3e1bd9c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
8.6 0-100

Chatsworth · 2026

How calculated

Chatsworth · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fc8517b99d5c7edb
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e440dadf80a8b5c93fbd410f7484
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
56 0-100

Chatsworth · 2026

How calculated

Chatsworth · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fc8517b99d5c7edb
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2e4726a44ca49f4cf41645466f57
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
7.6 0-100

Chatsworth · 2026

How calculated

Chatsworth · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fc8517b99d5c7edb
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1e006eb28951bb5aeeb999332421
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
47.7 percent

Chatsworth · 2026

How calculated

Chatsworth · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fc8517b99d5c7edb
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a09f7ff99999633e22562594ccd4
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
28.7 percent

Chatsworth · 2026

How calculated

Chatsworth · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fc8517b99d5c7edb
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7a90c3a2d24a367899939a681c30
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

45.4sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Bermudagrass Hay in Chatsworth?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Bermudagrass Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Bermudagrass Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 64 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.