Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Bermudagrass Hay
in St. Charles, Idaho

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Bermudagrass hay serving St. Charles.

Request Bermudagrass Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint10,207.9 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth64.6 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence81 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty49 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal11.3 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around St. Charles, but it does not measure how much is specifically Bermudagrass hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 10,208 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 46th percentile among 2,124 analyzed Idaho localities and the 73rd percentile nationally. Bear Lake County reports 13,024 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Plymouth, Utah, 42 miles away with 27,880 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 73% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 46th percentile among analyzed Idaho localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Bermudagrass hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

81 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 25,036 acres · 92nd regional percentile · 71st national percentile2009: 29,762 acres · 97th regional percentile · 80th national percentile2010: 53,289 acres · 100th regional percentile · 83rd national percentile2011: 36,178 acres · 95th regional percentile · 80th national percentile2012: 34,173 acres · 95th regional percentile · 78th national percentile2013: 67,595 acres · 100th regional percentile · 92nd national percentile2014: 78,964 acres · 100th regional percentile · 93rd national percentile2015: 23,442 acres · 81st regional percentile · 70th national percentile2016: 25,882 acres · 79th regional percentile · 73rd national percentile2017: 40,071 acres · 90th regional percentile · 77th national percentile2018: 42,212 acres · 85th regional percentile · 76th national percentile2019: 27,406 acres · 78th regional percentile · 66th national percentile2020: 26,973 acres · 81st regional percentile · 64th national percentile2021: 25,351 acres · 78th regional percentile · 71st national percentile2022: 23,756 acres · 77th regional percentile · 68th national percentile2023: 26,038 acres · 78th regional percentile · 71st national percentile2024: 1,579 acres · 39th regional percentile · 74th national percentile2025: 10,208 acres · 47th regional percentile · 73rd national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

64.6production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
12,808 head

Bear Lake County · 2022

How calculated

Bear Lake County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16007:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
12,808 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d4d50e34ade691dc5839a6c9e00e
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
18,118 head

Bear Lake County · 2022

How calculated

Bear Lake County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16007:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
18,118 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d99d13db8a68c78d8f8b32d828fb
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
477 head

Bear Lake County · 2022

How calculated

Bear Lake County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16007:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
477 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ac9f6c6ed514d821a3c554c18580
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
1,033 head

Bear Lake County · 2022

How calculated

Bear Lake County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16007:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,033 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a45a73c018478ea40876010791ad
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
2.5 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Bear Lake County · 2022

How calculated

Bear Lake County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16007:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:88ce48f888b56ac877df0ec2c8a0
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
(D) head

Bear Lake County · 2022

How calculated

Bear Lake County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16007:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b10cf1d1d02d96ddf5f1bb659538
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
48,356 acres

Bear Lake County · 2022

How calculated

Bear Lake County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16007:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
48,356 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:36335c40d103c072962b1e8d42d0
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
239 farms

Bear Lake County · 2022

How calculated

Bear Lake County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16007:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
239 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4ebab1a1551d430ab434edc6ccbc
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
31,394 acres

Bear Lake County · 2022

How calculated

Bear Lake County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16007:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
31,394 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f1e0d8174a63e7d4dd383223dbf4
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
215 farms

Bear Lake County · 2022

How calculated

Bear Lake County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16007:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
215 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ce4c67a5fbfc60fee7b9036ca94e
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
64.9 percent

Bear Lake County · 2022

How calculated

Bear Lake County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16007:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:448cfa4f2701e5778a3ba9ef2a03
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
77,762 tons

Bear Lake County · 2022

How calculated

Bear Lake County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16007:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
77,762 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:066e536d82617ffa761769c057d6
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Bermudagrass benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation11.3 in
How calculated

LIFTON PUMPING STN, ID US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:65f01664760bbdfd7fd108ce7c55
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature41 °F
How calculated

LIFTON PUMPING STN, ID US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:da9ed69d6643b9242d17ee165b5d
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance4 miles
How calculated

LIFTON PUMPING STN, ID US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from St. Charles reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:cc8cf410af0fa830ec9150498ad2
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

St. Charles · 2026

How calculated

St. Charles · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e06ea4f88e25761f69c3a488c0db
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
73 percent

St. Charles · 2026

How calculated

St. Charles · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:212905020b684cace4a620fb2d05
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

St. Charles · 2026

How calculated

St. Charles · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:df6cc36f9b30c02645ef1a9aa4fe
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D2 category

St. Charles · 2026

How calculated

St. Charles · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3f195371f45b6512579dc9cd27e3
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
54.6 0-100

St. Charles · 2026

How calculated

St. Charles · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:005d52ab16c6eb2eb5e76f82e37d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

St. Charles · 2026

How calculated

St. Charles · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5249b2c48a47921a8b92c17d7705
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
23 weeks

St. Charles · 2026

How calculated

St. Charles · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:40683b35d82f4b89308718daab7c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
54.6 0-100

St. Charles · 2026

How calculated

St. Charles · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ac29d529e26e99c9c3b2435e3dd0
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
20 0-100

St. Charles · 2026

How calculated

St. Charles · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f9d15a85d3266be5a0a160a2ec0f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
54.6 0-100

St. Charles · 2026

How calculated

St. Charles · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:404a41b29c3f899df3d54c054149
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
75.5 percent

St. Charles · 2026

How calculated

St. Charles · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f1e1b3943f8eae3aa1f3aff2ac6c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
46.7 percent

St. Charles · 2026

How calculated

St. Charles · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:aeadc0134d66c0c075386b88496b
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

49sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Bermudagrass Hay in St. Charles?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Bermudagrass Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Bermudagrass Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 66 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.