Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Barley Hay
in Roebling, New Jersey

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Barley hay serving Roebling.

Request Barley Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint270 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Barley crop context

Production depth70.2 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence65 / 100MODERATE
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty45 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal45.9 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies barley crop context around Roebling, but it does not measure how much is specifically Barley hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 270 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 65th percentile among 700 analyzed New Jersey localities and the 75th percentile nationally. Burlington County reports 4,678 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Barclay, New Jersey, 19 miles away with 598 mapped acres. The current drought signal is D0 as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped barley crop context footprint ranks at the 65th percentile among analyzed New Jersey localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader barley crop context; it does not identify how much is specifically Barley Hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local barley crop context footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

65 / 100 persistence · MODERATE

2008: 19 acres · 60th regional percentile · 64th national percentile2009: 79 acres · 77th regional percentile · 76th national percentile2010: 14 acres · 47th regional percentile · 62nd national percentile2011: 30 acres · 57th regional percentile · 70th national percentile2012: 16 acres · 42nd regional percentile · 63rd national percentile2013: 62 acres · 61st regional percentile · 72nd national percentile2014: 21 acres · 48th regional percentile · 62nd national percentile2015: 125 acres · 67th regional percentile · 77th national percentile2016: 5 acres · 21st regional percentile · 51st national percentile2017: 3 acres · 50th regional percentile · 54th national percentile2018: 26 acres · 54th regional percentile · 64th national percentile2019: 22 acres · 80th regional percentile · 64th national percentile2020: 10 acres · 40th regional percentile · 48th national percentile2021: 28 acres · 77th regional percentile · 63rd national percentile2022: 25 acres · 81st regional percentile · 67th national percentile2023: 4 acres · 20th regional percentile · 49th national percentile2024: 77 acres · 74th regional percentile · 63rd national percentile2025: 270 acres · 65th regional percentile · 75th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

70.2production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
582 head

Burlington County · 2022

How calculated

Burlington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
34005:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
582 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0c1e6d28ca47da8dbc3be6d020c8
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
978 head

Burlington County · 2022

How calculated

Burlington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
34005:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
978 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f06de84ca9aa95e76836fc6ab832
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
5 head

Burlington County · 2022

How calculated

Burlington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
34005:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
5 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2784fc8d1b110c8119842da0ba5f
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
3,306 head

Burlington County · 2022

How calculated

Burlington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
34005:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3,306 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a780e286c9627c68262e67be7cea
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
1.1 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Burlington County · 2022

How calculated

Burlington County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
34005:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:03078c09c9388c76e4fa6433a002
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
645 head

Burlington County · 2022

How calculated

Burlington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
34005:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
645 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c5075804a8e8520bd22d64251985
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
6,120 acres

Burlington County · 2022

How calculated

Burlington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
34005:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
6,120 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b2ef9856518cc3f0fa59615480c5
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
181 farms

Burlington County · 2022

How calculated

Burlington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
34005:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
181 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3248f0187ad85220dd9659a23720
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
196 acres

Burlington County · 2022

How calculated

Burlington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
34005:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
196 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:719b7f428a8715e12732d4e7d7bb
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
5 farms

Burlington County · 2022

How calculated

Burlington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
34005:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
5 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7f5ce15499817b62073b0d6b6975
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
3.2 percent

Burlington County · 2022

How calculated

Burlington County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
34005:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:fd6ec30930051ec759b5049c1954
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
13,939 tons

Burlington County · 2022

How calculated

Burlington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
34005:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
13,939 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:014b04d3603877e0c900257d30d9
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Barley Hay benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation45.9 in
How calculated

PHILADELPHIA/MT HOLLY WFO, NJ US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1f60f0c0822089f1c5811d0fa216
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature53.1 °F
How calculated

PHILADELPHIA/MT HOLLY WFO, NJ US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1c112fa8d3f5a0ce77589cc7105b
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance7.5 miles
How calculated

PHILADELPHIA/MT HOLLY WFO, NJ US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Roebling reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9dd91cd1acb2a262dc972ae6f23d
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
11.7 percent

Roebling · 2026

How calculated

Roebling · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0753b9351b171a94
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:575719c419bdc0f5c360a977b038
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Roebling · 2026

How calculated

Roebling · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0753b9351b171a94
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:82dba66a219d89d4d3c407c36b79
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Roebling · 2026

How calculated

Roebling · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0753b9351b171a94
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:bcdf04a913ced6607c4d38e2e483
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D0 category

Roebling · 2026

How calculated

Roebling · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0753b9351b171a94
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7c4c99f06477f3eded4d3a3e32b2
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
22 0-100

Roebling · 2026

How calculated

Roebling · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0753b9351b171a94
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c4edec6336c44b09e45ecf8114fc
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
IMPROVING category

Roebling · 2026

How calculated

Roebling · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0753b9351b171a94
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9f55083a8c60dc841da4bb7e882e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
17 weeks

Roebling · 2026

How calculated

Roebling · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0753b9351b171a94
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:68254528fd943885cbff7d6e9544
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
60 0-100

Roebling · 2026

How calculated

Roebling · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0753b9351b171a94
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f00e320321491db6863dce563302
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
30.9 0-100

Roebling · 2026

How calculated

Roebling · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0753b9351b171a94
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:51242cb1fc0f515c4fbe63ef9f7f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
42 0-100

Roebling · 2026

How calculated

Roebling · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0753b9351b171a94
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:56c55057ece5b578a45e8dff5aca
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
52.1 percent

Roebling · 2026

How calculated

Roebling · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0753b9351b171a94
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:bae3c5671b1274566bcba6ddaa50
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
17.3 percent

Roebling · 2026

How calculated

Roebling · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0753b9351b171a94
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f6a302f0aac6513f7e00b4a5cfec
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

45sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Barley Hay in Roebling?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Barley Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Barley Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 65 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.