HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Barley Hay
in Proctor, Minnesota

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Barley hay serving Proctor.

Request Barley Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint245.3 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Barley crop context

Production depth54.9 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence65 / 100MODERATE
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty52.6 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal30.9 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Barley Hay Quotes Sell Barley Hay Near Proctor
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies barley crop context around Proctor, but it does not measure how much is specifically Barley hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 245 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 37th percentile among 916 analyzed Minnesota localities and the 74th percentile nationally. St. Louis County reports 37,018 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Drummond, Wisconsin, 54 miles away with 761 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 100% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped barley crop context footprint ranks at the 37th percentile among analyzed Minnesota localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader barley crop context; it does not identify how much is specifically Barley Hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local barley crop context footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY
Within 25 miles245mapped acres · 0.02% of radius · 2025

37th percentile among 916 analyzed Minnesota localities · 74th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Proctor · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
1103
Evidence
FAMILY
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1103 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:443f067f37c348965992474f5ece
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

65 / 100 persistence · MODERATE

2008: 11 acres · 12th regional percentile · 59th national percentile2009: 38 acres · 21st regional percentile · 69th national percentile2010: 10 acres · 13th regional percentile · 60th national percentile2011: 13 acres · 19th regional percentile · 64th national percentile2012: 185 acres · 61st regional percentile · 83rd national percentile2013: 4 acres · 8th regional percentile · 51st national percentile2014: 2 acres · 12th regional percentile · 47th national percentile2015: 5 acres · 23rd regional percentile · 53rd national percentile2016: 0 acres · 6th regional percentile · 40th national percentile2017: 3 acres · 11th regional percentile · 54th national percentile2018: 164 acres · 70th regional percentile · 82nd national percentile2019: 47 acres · 51st regional percentile · 72nd national percentile2020: 9 acres · 11th regional percentile · 48th national percentile2021: 4 acres · 17th regional percentile · 42nd national percentile2022: 1 acres · 7th regional percentile · 41st national percentile2023: 2 acres · 9th regional percentile · 44th national percentile2024: 35 acres · 9th regional percentile · 54th national percentile2025: 245 acres · 37th regional percentile · 74th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

54.9production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
4,971 head

St. Louis County · 2022

How calculated

St. Louis County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27137:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
4,971 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d627cd41b42b3bfc24d8699bce87
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
11,243 head

St. Louis County · 2022

How calculated

St. Louis County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27137:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
11,243 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:631cc1578cd1ba541c20609d2391
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
979 head

St. Louis County · 2022

How calculated

St. Louis County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27137:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
979 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2ac3a0fca7ed5ba2aa23ff982b2f
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
991 head

St. Louis County · 2022

How calculated

St. Louis County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27137:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
991 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:01fd4e0a8d4e60941e6675a8938d
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
4.3 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

St. Louis County · 2022

How calculated

St. Louis County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27137:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f6092522cac3cf7d291be1a421e8
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
(D) head

St. Louis County · 2022

How calculated

St. Louis County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27137:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:cc636fe547f6f02beb19245b0189
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
53,962 acres

St. Louis County · 2022

How calculated

St. Louis County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27137:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
53,962 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f554e5b8fd5b6911e3beacf9ed1c
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
446 farms

St. Louis County · 2022

How calculated

St. Louis County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27137:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
446 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:384ecab4d272991670630d3214eb
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
310 acres

St. Louis County · 2022

How calculated

St. Louis County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27137:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
310 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:78b599cb20ae741aee2856078e82
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
9 farms

St. Louis County · 2022

How calculated

St. Louis County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27137:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
9 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:74c8df60f737b11f5bcc51d610ae
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
0.6 percent

St. Louis County · 2022

How calculated

St. Louis County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27137:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d8790cfdebbf22062c9fbd3fbe99
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
82,601 tons

St. Louis County · 2022

How calculated

St. Louis County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27137:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
82,601 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:77c359fe05580f97a797fa112b56
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Barley Hay benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation30.9 in
How calculated

DULUTH NWS, MN US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6c56f8ea409ded0f118549f902ec
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature39.7 °F
How calculated

DULUTH NWS, MN US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6e8256b8a8a5981626bbed3f47a5
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance6.7 miles
How calculated

DULUTH NWS, MN US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Proctor reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:42a1a9936e514406fb7d7bcc6615
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Proctor · 2026

How calculated

Proctor · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:31c7928d415fc524997cf5a7db82
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Proctor · 2026

How calculated

Proctor · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1f8543611ad96090f3b11808d69d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0.6 percent

Proctor · 2026

How calculated

Proctor · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8fcf5da23d1c1a9ff3186a71ffd0
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D2 category

Proctor · 2026

How calculated

Proctor · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:27b278552f461d540b952c36180f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
60.1 0-100

Proctor · 2026

How calculated

Proctor · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:03c32aec8be551dda0922d9d6185
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Proctor · 2026

How calculated

Proctor · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b51a289940e1b18bcf1754a58b6c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
26 weeks

Proctor · 2026

How calculated

Proctor · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:788378e54f7645003e8b41bdfcaf
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
20.3 0-100

Proctor · 2026

How calculated

Proctor · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6add7fb88d4c5a425f40b80e7860
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
40.5 0-100

Proctor · 2026

How calculated

Proctor · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:af7411025344f545cb98632811f0
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
59.9 0-100

Proctor · 2026

How calculated

Proctor · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e6a151009c6327c72bbac858f682
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
61.1 percent

Proctor · 2026

How calculated

Proctor · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:03b122568601119bf805f58d456e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
17 percent

Proctor · 2026

How calculated

Proctor · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5a9f395d79008607153ee508c0b8
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

52.6sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Barley Hay in Drummond, Wisconsin54 mi761 ac97.32. Barley Hay in Grand View, Wisconsin59.3 mi726 ac93.63. Barley Hay in Mahtowa, Minnesota23.3 mi705 ac93.34. Barley Hay in Barnum, Minnesota27.2 mi704 ac935. Barley Hay in Kerrick, Minnesota32.5 mi693 ac91.76. Barley Hay in Moose Lake, Minnesota32.3 mi667 ac89.27. Barley Hay in Kettle River, Minnesota35.5 mi648 ac87.18. Barley Hay in Cromwell, Minnesota30.7 mi632 ac85.79. Barley Hay in Sturgeon Lake, Minnesota37.2 mi616 ac83.810. Barley Hay in Willow River, Minnesota40.6 mi615 ac83.6
Source hay

Need Barley Hay in Proctor?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Barley Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Barley Hay markets in St. Louis Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Proctor

Alfalfa Hay in Proctor, MinnesotaExact-type evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Proctor, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Proctor, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Proctor, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Proctor, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityGrass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Proctor, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Barley Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 66 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.