HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Barley Hay
in Hibbing, Minnesota

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Barley hay serving Hibbing.

Request Barley Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint164.8 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Barley crop context

Production depth46.7 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence50.6 / 100MODERATE
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty58.9 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal24.8 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Barley Hay Quotes Sell Barley Hay Near Hibbing
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies barley crop context around Hibbing, but it does not measure how much is specifically Barley hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 165 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 30th percentile among 916 analyzed Minnesota localities and the 70th percentile nationally. St. Louis County reports 37,018 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Mahtowa, Minnesota, 60 miles away with 705 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 100% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped barley crop context footprint ranks at the 30th percentile among analyzed Minnesota localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader barley crop context; it does not identify how much is specifically Barley Hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local barley crop context footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY
Within 25 miles165mapped acres · 0.013% of radius · 2025

30th percentile among 916 analyzed Minnesota localities · 70th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Hibbing · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
741
Evidence
FAMILY
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
741 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:607d45671a44145dfebc8fc34499
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

50.6 / 100 persistence · MODERATE

2008: 0 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 34th national percentile2009: 10 acres · 7th regional percentile · 59th national percentile2010: 7 acres · 10th regional percentile · 57th national percentile2011: 135 acres · 65th regional percentile · 81st national percentile2012: 205 acres · 64th regional percentile · 84th national percentile2013: 87 acres · 48th regional percentile · 75th national percentile2014: 0 acres · 7th regional percentile · 39th national percentile2015: 0 acres · 11th regional percentile · 41st national percentile2016: 1 acres · 7th regional percentile · 43rd national percentile2017: 0 acres · 6th regional percentile · 40th national percentile2018: 5 acres · 18th regional percentile · 52nd national percentile2019: 1 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 38th national percentile2020: 0 acres · 4th regional percentile · 25th national percentile2021: 1 acres · 5th regional percentile · 34th national percentile2022: 2 acres · 10th regional percentile · 44th national percentile2023: 4 acres · 14th regional percentile · 47th national percentile2024: 0 acres · 5th regional percentile · 31st national percentile2025: 165 acres · 30th regional percentile · 70th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

46.7production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
4,971 head

St. Louis County · 2022

How calculated

St. Louis County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27137:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
4,971 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d627cd41b42b3bfc24d8699bce87
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
11,243 head

St. Louis County · 2022

How calculated

St. Louis County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27137:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
11,243 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:631cc1578cd1ba541c20609d2391
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
979 head

St. Louis County · 2022

How calculated

St. Louis County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27137:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
979 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2ac3a0fca7ed5ba2aa23ff982b2f
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
991 head

St. Louis County · 2022

How calculated

St. Louis County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27137:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
991 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:01fd4e0a8d4e60941e6675a8938d
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
4.3 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

St. Louis County · 2022

How calculated

St. Louis County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27137:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f6092522cac3cf7d291be1a421e8
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
(D) head

St. Louis County · 2022

How calculated

St. Louis County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27137:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:cc636fe547f6f02beb19245b0189
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
53,962 acres

St. Louis County · 2022

How calculated

St. Louis County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27137:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
53,962 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f554e5b8fd5b6911e3beacf9ed1c
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
446 farms

St. Louis County · 2022

How calculated

St. Louis County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27137:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
446 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:384ecab4d272991670630d3214eb
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
310 acres

St. Louis County · 2022

How calculated

St. Louis County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27137:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
310 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:78b599cb20ae741aee2856078e82
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
9 farms

St. Louis County · 2022

How calculated

St. Louis County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27137:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
9 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:74c8df60f737b11f5bcc51d610ae
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
0.6 percent

St. Louis County · 2022

How calculated

St. Louis County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27137:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d8790cfdebbf22062c9fbd3fbe99
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
82,601 tons

St. Louis County · 2022

How calculated

St. Louis County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27137:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
82,601 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:77c359fe05580f97a797fa112b56
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Barley Hay benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation24.8 in
How calculated

HIBBING CHISHOLM HIBBING AP, MN US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:961401176e2fde038e9d9f46397f
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature36.9 °F
How calculated

HIBBING CHISHOLM HIBBING AP, MN US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a3bbc68422340fc0ff2cb2d4226f
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance5.1 miles
How calculated

HIBBING CHISHOLM HIBBING AP, MN US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Hibbing reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:49c23d5326741372f2b484b94751
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Hibbing · 2026

How calculated

Hibbing · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:dae6ecc153b9666234bb034fc121
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Hibbing · 2026

How calculated

Hibbing · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c4ed44b29ccf72c1e699da481ee2
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0.6 percent

Hibbing · 2026

How calculated

Hibbing · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f3a2ea5d601a079be98d91bb34fd
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D2 category

Hibbing · 2026

How calculated

Hibbing · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5562e09790b800017aa413550ee1
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
60.1 0-100

Hibbing · 2026

How calculated

Hibbing · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:64aac08a93033a65ab1018f9ad96
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Hibbing · 2026

How calculated

Hibbing · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9da98c4dc09413e4cd6b478e1504
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
26 weeks

Hibbing · 2026

How calculated

Hibbing · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:53973f4db216d01842671b6b8153
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
20.3 0-100

Hibbing · 2026

How calculated

Hibbing · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0cc32c56ee948a16bc260801c093
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
40.5 0-100

Hibbing · 2026

How calculated

Hibbing · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f7a7e2d2b2635828ca9928587238
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
59.9 0-100

Hibbing · 2026

How calculated

Hibbing · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5af16b2aab9976c2029f79832cb1
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
61.1 percent

Hibbing · 2026

How calculated

Hibbing · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:332ab1208f56575e764fb2306f16
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
17 percent

Hibbing · 2026

How calculated

Hibbing · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a3c1ab06aa32c55340b0ee060b1a
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

58.9sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Barley Hay in Mahtowa, Minnesota60.1 mi705 ac972. Barley Hay in Barnum, Minnesota62.7 mi704 ac96.73. Barley Hay in Kerrick, Minnesota75 mi693 ac954. Barley Hay in Moose Lake, Minnesota65.9 mi667 ac92.75. Barley Hay in Kettle River, Minnesota62.9 mi648 ac90.86. Barley Hay in Cromwell, Minnesota49.6 mi632 ac89.77. Barley Hay in Sturgeon Lake, Minnesota69.7 mi616 ac878. Barley Hay in Willow River, Minnesota74.3 mi615 ac86.79. Barley Hay in Bruno, Minnesota78.1 mi606 ac85.610. Barley Hay in Rutledge, Minnesota78.8 mi596 ac84.5
Source hay

Need Barley Hay in Hibbing?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Barley Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Barley Hay markets in St. Louis Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Hibbing

Alfalfa Hay in Hibbing, MinnesotaExact-type evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Hibbing, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Hibbing, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Hibbing, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Hibbing, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityGrass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Hibbing, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Barley Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 66 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.