Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Barley Hay
in Eaton, Colorado

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Barley hay serving Eaton.

Request Barley Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint4,103.6 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Barley crop context

Production depth90.4 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence80.9 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty35.1 / 100LOW

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal14.7 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies barley crop context around Eaton, but it does not measure how much is specifically Barley hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 4,104 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 93rd percentile among 482 analyzed Colorado localities and the 96th percentile nationally. Weld County reports 27,810 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Gilcrest, Colorado, 17 miles away with 5,607 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 52.6% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

Eaton ranks among the strongest persistent mapped barley crop context footprints in Colorado.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2008-30m
  • usda-cdl-2009-30m
  • usda-cdl-2010-30m
  • usda-cdl-2011-30m
  • usda-cdl-2012-30m
  • usda-cdl-2013-30m
  • usda-cdl-2014-30m
  • usda-cdl-2015-30m
  • usda-cdl-2016-30m
  • usda-cdl-2017-30m
  • usda-cdl-2018-30m
  • usda-cdl-2019-30m
  • usda-cdl-2020-30m
  • usda-cdl-2021-30m
  • usda-cdl-2022-30m
  • usda-cdl-2023-30m
  • usda-cdl-2024-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader barley crop context; it does not identify how much is specifically Barley Hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local barley crop context footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

80.9 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 7,802 acres · 89th regional percentile · 97th national percentile2009: 8,974 acres · 93rd regional percentile · 98th national percentile2010: 17,032 acres · 94th regional percentile · 99th national percentile2011: 8,581 acres · 91st regional percentile · 98th national percentile2012: 5,723 acres · 85th regional percentile · 96th national percentile2013: 4,904 acres · 88th regional percentile · 96th national percentile2014: 4,935 acres · 86th regional percentile · 96th national percentile2015: 2,659 acres · 86th regional percentile · 95th national percentile2016: 3,928 acres · 87th regional percentile · 96th national percentile2017: 3,351 acres · 87th regional percentile · 96th national percentile2018: 3,888 acres · 88th regional percentile · 96th national percentile2019: 4,039 acres · 89th regional percentile · 96th national percentile2020: 4,446 acres · 89th regional percentile · 96th national percentile2021: 5,050 acres · 90th regional percentile · 97th national percentile2022: 6,201 acres · 89th regional percentile · 97th national percentile2023: 4,779 acres · 87th regional percentile · 96th national percentile2024: 4,792 acres · 88th regional percentile · 97th national percentile2025: 4,104 acres · 93rd regional percentile · 96th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

90.4production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
50,965 head

Weld County · 2022

How calculated

Weld County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
08123:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
50,965 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e095aeb4cb8feb9db4ded246dcdd
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
545,480 head

Weld County · 2022

How calculated

Weld County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
08123:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
545,480 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f6bf5f1206314bb3dac4d0ce1556
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
134,728 head

Weld County · 2022

How calculated

Weld County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
08123:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
134,728 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a4a6906c38b0df30cf0d02babadc
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
7,229 head

Weld County · 2022

How calculated

Weld County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
08123:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
7,229 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d2b9c51c179c8442fda287ded1e7
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.1 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Weld County · 2022

How calculated

Weld County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
08123:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d22385b2eeeba8c7748db5541a63
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
3,832 head

Weld County · 2022

How calculated

Weld County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
08123:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3,832 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0972925ab71d5499fb23c3bc394f
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
99,262 acres

Weld County · 2022

How calculated

Weld County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
08123:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
99,262 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5106a17a38339d422ea718b7396f
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
991 farms

Weld County · 2022

How calculated

Weld County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
08123:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
991 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e5df0a475d0d94efe71b22a647e7
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
83,991 acres

Weld County · 2022

How calculated

Weld County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
08123:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
83,991 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:652cb5141cd64d4d5235628e1e66
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
814 farms

Weld County · 2022

How calculated

Weld County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
08123:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
814 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4982b2eecf630155ca44d5aeb542
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
84.6 percent

Weld County · 2022

How calculated

Weld County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
08123:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:48882fa55a71442d2254cca603dc
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
306,294 tons

Weld County · 2022

How calculated

Weld County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
08123:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
306,294 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3bcfc89e2eef8dc2d9cecb756637
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Barley Hay benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation14.7 in
How calculated

GREELEY UNC, CO US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:572dc00108729818213b7bb245c2
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature52.1 °F
How calculated

GREELEY UNC, CO US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:050cf48a17d404543c4f039cae43
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance8.6 miles
How calculated

GREELEY UNC, CO US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Eaton reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:550b87718e362bb70b1bc48f2978
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
93.7 percent

Eaton · 2026

How calculated

Eaton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0ebb5a9cf153f89b
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:12de4558bcfb5c36632bc0c953c9
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
52.6 percent

Eaton · 2026

How calculated

Eaton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0ebb5a9cf153f89b
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:22cded46cb2a8f8b56f7a6b53bf5
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
20 percent

Eaton · 2026

How calculated

Eaton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0ebb5a9cf153f89b
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a785412723e6b6db82fe72a623d6
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D2 category

Eaton · 2026

How calculated

Eaton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0ebb5a9cf153f89b
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:41887eed51ca5512eedae254b77b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
53.3 0-100

Eaton · 2026

How calculated

Eaton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0ebb5a9cf153f89b
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9fbf3d8ce5e69e9688f022db661c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
IMPROVING category

Eaton · 2026

How calculated

Eaton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0ebb5a9cf153f89b
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6bb8bed785f423f0d0bc27f8150b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
35 weeks

Eaton · 2026

How calculated

Eaton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0ebb5a9cf153f89b
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:812a6a6ed4d5c2285548090412b5
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
65.9 0-100

Eaton · 2026

How calculated

Eaton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0ebb5a9cf153f89b
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:38561b2b0ac999ab07f080c629ff
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
51.5 0-100

Eaton · 2026

How calculated

Eaton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0ebb5a9cf153f89b
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8b93654de220dca67a276508b2e1
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
75.4 0-100

Eaton · 2026

How calculated

Eaton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0ebb5a9cf153f89b
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f30dd67b605d6fe9480207ba2b1e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
66.7 percent

Eaton · 2026

How calculated

Eaton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0ebb5a9cf153f89b
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0ee372eb02175dbcf66ebf6e9968
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
46.9 percent

Eaton · 2026

How calculated

Eaton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0ebb5a9cf153f89b
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d495d1b3fee7c86bcd3a3d4493bb
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

35.1sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Barley Hay in Eaton?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Barley Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Barley Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 66 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.