HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Superior, Wisconsin

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Superior.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Local mapped footprint4,658.3 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth44.1 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence86 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty60.6 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal31.4 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Superior
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Superior. The latest 2025 raster shows 4,658 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 6th percentile among 808 analyzed Wisconsin localities and the 60th percentile nationally. Douglas County reports 6,580 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Shell Lake, Wisconsin, 64 miles away with 20,825 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 100% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureHIGH
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 6th percentile among analyzed Wisconsin localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT
Within 25 miles4,658mapped acres · 0.371% of radius · 2025

6th percentile among 808 analyzed Wisconsin localities · 60th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Superior · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
20946
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
20946 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d6fd2f31735fa8f06a350481cda5
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

86 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 2,300 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 51st national percentile2009: 2,772 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 56th national percentile2010: 1,085 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 44th national percentile2011: 3,497 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 53rd national percentile2012: 1,815 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 52nd national percentile2013: 1,378 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 49th national percentile2014: 2,274 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 51st national percentile2015: 2,307 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 51st national percentile2016: 1,866 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 48th national percentile2017: 3,144 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 54th national percentile2018: 2,867 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 53rd national percentile2019: 2,069 acres · 1st regional percentile · 48th national percentile2020: 2,609 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 51st national percentile2021: 1,571 acres · 1st regional percentile · 47th national percentile2022: 1,904 acres · 1st regional percentile · 50th national percentile2023: 1,599 acres · 1st regional percentile · 49th national percentile2024: 760 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 50th national percentile2025: 4,658 acres · 6th regional percentile · 60th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

44.1production depth
Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL
6,580 acres

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55031:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
6,580 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6feee481fd600af341308b78b2da
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL
51 farms

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55031:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
51 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0f942d1aa34c7472b900f45a106c
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
- acres

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55031:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3baa35736e643a168d749dee42c6
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
- farms

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55031:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7439a0fe21ee52950939fe607023
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL
14,714 tons

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55031:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
14,714 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:49e0ff4bbd5bb1f7c8bc1c0a571d
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL
2.2 tons/acre

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55031:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:41ad77a7274e82a3f384cd16b2f0
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
2,774 head

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55031:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2,774 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8d76dadd8959b0d7cb5b7eff39f9
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
6,184 head

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55031:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
6,184 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:84687ae69a43587051e04b521812
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
340 head

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55031:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
340 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b5ce3c0e0132b5fcbe3910b8983d
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
261 head

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55031:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
261 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c64647bc02f621cd61eabd91d816
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
2.9 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55031:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6dbd4ca24910e32699f559cb14d9
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
(D) head

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55031:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:514afdca4700c71fccb4c2b6520e
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation31.5 in
How calculated

SUPERIOR, WI US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:19adf3728afe0b678f68f8e17c44
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature41.4 °F
How calculated

SUPERIOR, WI US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:41c0e12b588ed59b71c26c2fd6e6
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance5.7 miles
How calculated

SUPERIOR, WI US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Superior reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8a7902525e5ffd2613e364622b20
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Superior · 2026

How calculated

Superior · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ce6792ba626f8bf45c54834c1d01
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Superior · 2026

How calculated

Superior · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:17544dd4a543b2a9541928db9f4e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Superior · 2026

How calculated

Superior · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:40665a6b48239ac4b85282a33a8d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D3 category

Superior · 2026

How calculated

Superior · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d14d5fadb3cd9fef8f42eaed8985
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
80 0-100

Superior · 2026

How calculated

Superior · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0bf2f9d958660986b5dbccb8c1df
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Superior · 2026

How calculated

Superior · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4844a2833e139b0d3dbd36a037dc
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
26 weeks

Superior · 2026

How calculated

Superior · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5aea0fd63b83a77d7c93021e8b22
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
20 0-100

Superior · 2026

How calculated

Superior · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d57a2783bb43d90d56e3b44e70ac
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
48.1 0-100

Superior · 2026

How calculated

Superior · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:55fcb4b63fb5aa416d802c5e8815
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
47.6 0-100

Superior · 2026

How calculated

Superior · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a4140773b66e374a7f919819feab
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
59.7 percent

Superior · 2026

How calculated

Superior · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c1d23c4bb7ac3696b68e6e5c0305
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
32.1 percent

Superior · 2026

How calculated

Superior · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:fc4a71bd6de84e9f1d3825d8826c
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

60.6sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Alfalfa Hay in Shell Lake, Wisconsin64.4 mi20,825 ac96.82. Alfalfa Hay in Pine City, Minnesota69.2 mi18,644 ac88.73. Alfalfa Hay in Lewis, Wisconsin65.5 mi17,654 ac85.34. Alfalfa Hay in Siren, Wisconsin61.6 mi16,224 ac80.35. Alfalfa Hay in Grantsburg, Wisconsin65.7 mi16,165 ac79.96. Alfalfa Hay in Brook Park, Minnesota66.8 mi16,158 ac79.97. Alfalfa Hay in Spooner, Wisconsin57.8 mi14,792 ac75.48. Alfalfa Hay in Webster, Wisconsin54.5 mi13,516 ac719. Alfalfa Hay in Hinckley, Minnesota58.3 mi13,330 ac70.110. Alfalfa Hay in Stone Lake, Wisconsin62 mi10,347 ac59.2
Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Superior?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Alfalfa Hay markets in Douglas Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Superior

Barley Hay in Superior, Douglas County (GEOID 5578660), WisconsinContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Superior, Douglas County (GEOID 5578660), WisconsinContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Superior, Douglas County (GEOID 5578660), WisconsinContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Superior, Douglas County (GEOID 5578660), WisconsinContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Superior, Douglas County (GEOID 5578660), WisconsinContextual local forage evidence in this localityGrass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Superior, Douglas County (GEOID 5578660), WisconsinContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 70 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.