HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Crandon, Wisconsin

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Crandon.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Local mapped footprint2,813.1 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth43.9 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence88.9 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty60.7 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal34.1 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Crandon
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Crandon. The latest 2025 raster shows 2,813 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 4th percentile among 808 analyzed Wisconsin localities and the 53rd percentile nationally. Forest County reports 1,206 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Angelica, Wisconsin, 68 miles away with 75,372 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 49.5% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 4th percentile among analyzed Wisconsin localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT
Within 25 miles2,813mapped acres · 0.224% of radius · 2025

4th percentile among 808 analyzed Wisconsin localities · 53th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Crandon · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
12649
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
12649 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:84db26bea06daf6bce53b2c08097
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

88.9 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 9,692 acres · 8th regional percentile · 70th national percentile2009: 6,823 acres · 7th regional percentile · 67th national percentile2010: 4,302 acres · 4th regional percentile · 59th national percentile2011: 9,885 acres · 8th regional percentile · 66th national percentile2012: 5,884 acres · 7th regional percentile · 64th national percentile2013: 4,629 acres · 5th regional percentile · 62nd national percentile2014: 4,875 acres · 5th regional percentile · 60th national percentile2015: 6,334 acres · 5th regional percentile · 61st national percentile2016: 7,322 acres · 6th regional percentile · 63rd national percentile2017: 6,945 acres · 5th regional percentile · 63rd national percentile2018: 7,159 acres · 6th regional percentile · 63rd national percentile2019: 8,202 acres · 8th regional percentile · 65th national percentile2020: 8,512 acres · 7th regional percentile · 64th national percentile2021: 6,782 acres · 6th regional percentile · 64th national percentile2022: 6,848 acres · 6th regional percentile · 64th national percentile2023: 6,385 acres · 6th regional percentile · 64th national percentile2024: 2,028 acres · 5th regional percentile · 59th national percentile2025: 2,813 acres · 4th regional percentile · 53rd national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

43.9production depth
Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL
1,206 acres

Forest County · 2022

How calculated

Forest County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55041:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,206 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b4e175d20efaf19892e8b4127b32
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL
25 farms

Forest County · 2022

How calculated

Forest County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55041:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
25 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b1276fc231240a3da10421df9b2d
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
- acres

Forest County · 2022

How calculated

Forest County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55041:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6bf6a5310c404e2596dd75011b58
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
- farms

Forest County · 2022

How calculated

Forest County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55041:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:871c8f204306ae63a1118e6dd358
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL
1,835 tons

Forest County · 2022

How calculated

Forest County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55041:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,835 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:230d4a8c4b47946bd3fabf00228a
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL
1.5 tons/acre

Forest County · 2022

How calculated

Forest County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55041:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:76676e5fb7f7b1ffd856140af946
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
625 head

Forest County · 2022

How calculated

Forest County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55041:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
625 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b297744f4957e4f69d5f6f72e88b
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
1,448 head

Forest County · 2022

How calculated

Forest County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55041:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,448 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4cffba003a6831af44098f876120
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
- head

Forest County · 2022

How calculated

Forest County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55041:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:42c0af271a6b1715f40deaf9c297
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
71 head

Forest County · 2022

How calculated

Forest County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55041:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
71 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:af4d082028975ac8f70d6cb6f529
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
2.6 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Forest County · 2022

How calculated

Forest County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55041:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d32c9cb0b131dec126d14ba50480
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
(D) head

Forest County · 2022

How calculated

Forest County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55041:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a873ccde964b475281d875eca6a4
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation34.1 in
How calculated

LAONA 6 SW, WI US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:21897192e13bb51c776260eb6bd0
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature39.7 °F
How calculated

LAONA 6 SW, WI US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:48b64ae4b5135a25814aa6581809
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance7.6 miles
How calculated

LAONA 6 SW, WI US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Crandon reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1ba7e4cca635c6830a11e17f80a0
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Crandon · 2026

How calculated

Crandon · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2b238216b9f266fc3677d6e29fe4
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
49.5 percent

Crandon · 2026

How calculated

Crandon · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9d1568a58c79b0e93a746e417c6d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Crandon · 2026

How calculated

Crandon · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:855b77076931de9aed74fb6c7c73
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D1 category

Crandon · 2026

How calculated

Crandon · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ac6d7bc535713800dd05b2257653
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
49.9 0-100

Crandon · 2026

How calculated

Crandon · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:171032680f96fd81bf246caffad3
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Crandon · 2026

How calculated

Crandon · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d083f4ad604d6d01bbf2091711f6
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
19 weeks

Crandon · 2026

How calculated

Crandon · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:be2c2fbbc3727ab046fbf4b71275
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
20 0-100

Crandon · 2026

How calculated

Crandon · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:aea9189e4611e835820dcfa56713
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
35.7 0-100

Crandon · 2026

How calculated

Crandon · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b4baa0101261446fda439bf94f4b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
37 0-100

Crandon · 2026

How calculated

Crandon · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a58903fea1c8407803d918dbbb05
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
39.9 percent

Crandon · 2026

How calculated

Crandon · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:82b67c11785f7970a8e54fe20263
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
14.8 percent

Crandon · 2026

How calculated

Crandon · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a46d4871dbb290df68f9aa10f477
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

60.7sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Alfalfa Hay in Angelica, Wisconsin67.7 mi75,372 ac96.62. Alfalfa Hay in Bonduel, Wisconsin61.3 mi70,819 ac92.43. Alfalfa Hay in Shawano, Wisconsin57 mi69,055 ac90.94. Alfalfa Hay in Pulcifer, Wisconsin56 mi68,354 ac90.25. Alfalfa Hay in Krakow, Wisconsin63.9 mi68,562 ac906. Alfalfa Hay in Gillett, Wisconsin54.9 mi67,594 ac89.57. Alfalfa Hay in Cecil, Wisconsin56.6 mi67,523 ac89.48. Alfalfa Hay in Embarrass, Wisconsin62.7 mi67,444 ac899. Alfalfa Hay in Thornton, Wisconsin54.1 mi66,940 ac88.910. Alfalfa Hay in Green Valley, Wisconsin61.4 mi67,114 ac88.7
Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Crandon?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Alfalfa Hay markets in Forest Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Crandon

Barley Hay in Crandon, WisconsinContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Crandon, WisconsinContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Crandon, WisconsinContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Crandon, WisconsinContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Crandon, WisconsinContextual local forage evidence in this localityGrass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Crandon, WisconsinContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 70 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.