Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Cedarburg, Wisconsin

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Cedarburg.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Local mapped footprint34,392.9 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth62.4 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence93.8 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty48.9 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal35.5 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Cedarburg. The latest 2025 raster shows 34,393 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 35th percentile among 808 analyzed Wisconsin localities and the 94th percentile nationally. Ozaukee County reports 4,944 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Glenbeulah, Wisconsin, 35 miles away with 109,964 mapped acres. The current drought signal is D0 as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 35th percentile among analyzed Wisconsin localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT

Footprint history

93.8 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 62,776 acres · 36th regional percentile · 95th national percentile2009: 46,025 acres · 26th regional percentile · 94th national percentile2010: 49,905 acres · 36th regional percentile · 93rd national percentile2011: 44,536 acres · 28th regional percentile · 91st national percentile2012: 39,447 acres · 30th regional percentile · 91st national percentile2013: 38,364 acres · 30th regional percentile · 92nd national percentile2014: 40,801 acres · 27th regional percentile · 91st national percentile2015: 52,235 acres · 30th regional percentile · 93rd national percentile2016: 57,013 acres · 30th regional percentile · 94th national percentile2017: 52,231 acres · 31st regional percentile · 94th national percentile2018: 50,052 acres · 29th regional percentile · 93rd national percentile2019: 60,981 acres · 33rd regional percentile · 95th national percentile2020: 68,320 acres · 38th regional percentile · 95th national percentile2021: 56,506 acres · 35th regional percentile · 94th national percentile2022: 52,663 acres · 36th regional percentile · 94th national percentile2023: 48,401 acres · 36th regional percentile · 94th national percentile2024: 41,776 acres · 45th regional percentile · 96th national percentile2025: 34,393 acres · 35th regional percentile · 94th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

62.4production depth
Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL
4,944 acres

Ozaukee County · 2022

How calculated

Ozaukee County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55089:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
4,944 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d31106334bd90d9c1a1815d2c293
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL
102 farms

Ozaukee County · 2022

How calculated

Ozaukee County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55089:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
102 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:db2be89cb9c3a4aa276bf956eb71
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
- acres

Ozaukee County · 2022

How calculated

Ozaukee County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55089:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:48cb1304cbb3215876d2d9810d96
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
- farms

Ozaukee County · 2022

How calculated

Ozaukee County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55089:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7640fe5d2a8cda5b85bd47a58fc9
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL
13,992 tons

Ozaukee County · 2022

How calculated

Ozaukee County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55089:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
13,992 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:025f1587af465ea7571dace0783f
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL
2.8 tons/acre

Ozaukee County · 2022

How calculated

Ozaukee County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55089:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c9293fdf6ab729a5eb8ec489da49
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
467 head

Ozaukee County · 2022

How calculated

Ozaukee County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55089:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
467 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3e35db58134f1714fb183f1642b3
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
17,231 head

Ozaukee County · 2022

How calculated

Ozaukee County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55089:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
17,231 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5200dcab852c129b1b30bd0c5dc1
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
8,184 head

Ozaukee County · 2022

How calculated

Ozaukee County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55089:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
8,184 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d8336f8b66ba34459be7c5046067
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
374 head

Ozaukee County · 2022

How calculated

Ozaukee County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55089:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
374 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:576c84a2cf1d1bf84b22c89f0731
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.3 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Ozaukee County · 2022

How calculated

Ozaukee County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55089:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:75e4db5b3105cc70f64dfbe8b3a0
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
(D) head

Ozaukee County · 2022

How calculated

Ozaukee County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
55089:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:30f864eca82fc904b1e5b218967d
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation35.5 in
How calculated

GRAFTON WWTP, WI US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5fa7f74c20aadf5a2ca96ed5720a
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature47.9 °F
How calculated

GRAFTON WWTP, WI US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ed550510719da190c4f34ef64658
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance1.8 miles
How calculated

GRAFTON WWTP, WI US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Cedarburg reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d11d00e7d7e5ef8433e961844cc8
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Cedarburg · 2026

How calculated

Cedarburg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b3983df42cacc4e097a83d1e731c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Cedarburg · 2026

How calculated

Cedarburg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f09eb59b38edfe3670b2b013f330
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Cedarburg · 2026

How calculated

Cedarburg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7c977368996a7b3226a3963f8ed7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D0 category

Cedarburg · 2026

How calculated

Cedarburg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8d63308f1529ffdfe07698820bb1
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
20 0-100

Cedarburg · 2026

How calculated

Cedarburg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:47f12bd0df33a0212be98c5bcb40
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Cedarburg · 2026

How calculated

Cedarburg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ef931cf4a47e81c1edfbc786af1f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
1 weeks

Cedarburg · 2026

How calculated

Cedarburg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:cb951e9f9d91143eebc95cb6c002
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
22.4 0-100

Cedarburg · 2026

How calculated

Cedarburg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:36ba764bc32aecd401817a576f28
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
20 0-100

Cedarburg · 2026

How calculated

Cedarburg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5a9f1fc6f6a78a1824510f0511a5
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
20 0-100

Cedarburg · 2026

How calculated

Cedarburg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d662fbecf929e224f865e0605721
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
2.3 percent

Cedarburg · 2026

How calculated

Cedarburg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:69deb1f29fcd2be28624f2d21359
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Cedarburg · 2026

How calculated

Cedarburg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:9b35245c78a3570d
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b794c861fc06d7b3f57ce8d7b9d2
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

48.9sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Cedarburg?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 70 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.