HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Starbuck, Washington

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Starbuck.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Local mapped footprint5,324.1 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth80.7 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence85.2 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty42.8 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal18.8 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Starbuck
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Starbuck. The latest 2025 raster shows 5,324 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 73rd percentile among 639 analyzed Washington localities and the 62nd percentile nationally. Columbia County reports 1,703 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Marine View, Washington, 65 miles away with 72,253 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 100% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 73rd percentile among analyzed Washington localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT
Within 25 miles5,324mapped acres · 0.424% of radius · 2025

73th percentile among 639 analyzed Washington localities · 62th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Starbuck · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
23940
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
23940 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b1e4fc69175e54fa299df592d5e9
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

85.2 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 3,502 acres · 72nd regional percentile · 56th national percentile2009: 5,644 acres · 74th regional percentile · 65th national percentile2010: 2,594 acres · 74th regional percentile · 53rd national percentile2011: 3,654 acres · 72nd regional percentile · 53rd national percentile2012: 3,165 acres · 71st regional percentile · 57th national percentile2013: 3,414 acres · 74th regional percentile · 58th national percentile2014: 3,267 acres · 72nd regional percentile · 55th national percentile2015: 4,237 acres · 72nd regional percentile · 57th national percentile2016: 4,801 acres · 73rd regional percentile · 58th national percentile2017: 6,238 acres · 73rd regional percentile · 62nd national percentile2018: 4,764 acres · 72nd regional percentile · 58th national percentile2019: 8,479 acres · 74th regional percentile · 65th national percentile2020: 10,180 acres · 73rd regional percentile · 66th national percentile2021: 8,807 acres · 73rd regional percentile · 66th national percentile2022: 8,971 acres · 74th regional percentile · 67th national percentile2023: 8,132 acres · 73rd regional percentile · 67th national percentile2024: 3,908 acres · 74th regional percentile · 67th national percentile2025: 5,324 acres · 73rd regional percentile · 62nd national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

80.7production depth
Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL
1,703 acres

Columbia County · 2022

How calculated

Columbia County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53013:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,703 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:61bb959fff0255be7c34f0eb6ce1
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL
28 farms

Columbia County · 2022

How calculated

Columbia County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53013:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
28 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f54d4986c830b3d87853a6979682
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
1,368 acres

Columbia County · 2022

How calculated

Columbia County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53013:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,368 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:cdd7a603c0578c589df3fe53a80a
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
22 farms

Columbia County · 2022

How calculated

Columbia County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53013:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
22 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:95e84a7b0ee027d0357c8ee1fc3b
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
80.3 percent

Columbia County · 2022

How calculated

Columbia County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53013:alfalfa:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b5488f34828eddd4dc8e3a3cc37c
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL
6,712 tons

Columbia County · 2022

How calculated

Columbia County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53013:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
6,712 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:37d63aafe670359ebc8fa9982001
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL
3.9 tons/acre

Columbia County · 2022

How calculated

Columbia County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53013:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:72a1eda82afea0cd75e22e9168ff
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Columbia County · 2022

How calculated

Columbia County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53013:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:355cb57aa28da400bce5852ef5c2
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
3,903 head

Columbia County · 2022

How calculated

Columbia County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53013:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3,903 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6b2cbc6a98f1ac291081c3a49ec9
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Columbia County · 2022

How calculated

Columbia County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53013:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0d1aa2c61dcf33a307a6ba6c2251
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
294 head

Columbia County · 2022

How calculated

Columbia County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53013:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
294 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3d107066e5d7c5cddae398c14893
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
1.4 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Columbia County · 2022

How calculated

Columbia County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53013:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2590d12f3cd0b62508b3f1cac123
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation18.8 in
How calculated

DAYTON 1 WSW, WA US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6ac78f3782271c9a3fb71ebe25db
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature51.1 °F
How calculated

DAYTON 1 WSW, WA US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6d3a9c300f15516661024136d97c
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance15.5 miles
How calculated

DAYTON 1 WSW, WA US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Starbuck reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ed53e4efbe90466b93855728576d
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Starbuck · 2026

How calculated

Starbuck · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:240ed2a2d1348e657025f4a5a533
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Starbuck · 2026

How calculated

Starbuck · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4ce1224195490f16b8efe8d90408
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Starbuck · 2026

How calculated

Starbuck · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:08b17bcc5e77a3f6d5f6ef66f38a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D2 category

Starbuck · 2026

How calculated

Starbuck · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:aaf8438dc3289521d6406ed0c9ef
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
60 0-100

Starbuck · 2026

How calculated

Starbuck · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2b8c68913f55dcd7e50662a25583
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Starbuck · 2026

How calculated

Starbuck · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:322cfbb7d62eace0491a9b4cdff2
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
53 weeks

Starbuck · 2026

How calculated

Starbuck · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:608176a1f63549f2110706955e0c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
39.8 0-100

Starbuck · 2026

How calculated

Starbuck · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2b6b2a2afcacdea32541b35b5c94
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
42.2 0-100

Starbuck · 2026

How calculated

Starbuck · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ebe48c23d4d850166bbcacd82e6f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
60 0-100

Starbuck · 2026

How calculated

Starbuck · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:33b2ec47bae573eed97c56f25f8f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
98.6 percent

Starbuck · 2026

How calculated

Starbuck · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4e40ff647503b1e8b03f5073621c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
46.8 percent

Starbuck · 2026

How calculated

Starbuck · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:96702b2fc1d4a33d3754128a9025
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

42.8sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Alfalfa Hay in Marine View, Washington65.4 mi72,253 ac96.72. Alfalfa Hay in Cascade Valley, Washington71 mi67,341 ac91.33. Alfalfa Hay in Moses Lake, Washington68.5 mi63,095 ac87.14. Alfalfa Hay in Moses Lake North, Washington72.9 mi61,968 ac85.75. Alfalfa Hay in Othello, Washington53.3 mi59,575 ac84.26. Alfalfa Hay in Basin City, Washington49.1 mi57,549 ac82.37. Alfalfa Hay in Wheeler, Washington65.2 mi56,129 ac808. Alfalfa Hay in Mesa, Washington41.6 mi52,868 ac77.89. Alfalfa Hay in Burbank, Washington46.5 mi48,765 ac73.310. Alfalfa Hay in Finley, Washington50 mi48,087 ac72.4
Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Starbuck?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Alfalfa Hay markets in Columbia Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Starbuck

Barley Hay in Starbuck, WashingtonContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Starbuck, WashingtonContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Starbuck, WashingtonContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Starbuck, WashingtonContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Starbuck, WashingtonContextual local forage evidence in this localityGrass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Starbuck, WashingtonContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 73 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.