HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Mineral, Washington

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Mineral.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Local mapped footprint0.7 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth37.8 / 100LOW

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence57.8 / 100MODERATE
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty61.4 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal82.6 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Mineral
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Mineral. The latest 2025 raster shows 1 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 10th percentile among 639 analyzed Washington localities and the 17th percentile nationally. Lewis County reports 2,198 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Longbranch, Washington, 44 miles away with 220 mapped acres. The current drought signal is D0 as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyLIMITED
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 10th percentile among analyzed Washington localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT
Within 25 miles1mapped acres · 0% of radius · 2025

10th percentile among 639 analyzed Washington localities · 17th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Mineral · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
3
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3a48e2cceff3f306768efb3403a2
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

57.8 / 100 persistence · MODERATE

2008: 10 acres · 11th regional percentile · 18th national percentile2009: 8 acres · 10th regional percentile · 18th national percentile2010: 0 acres · 7th regional percentile · 13th national percentile2011: 11 acres · 12th regional percentile · 20th national percentile2012: 36 acres · 39th regional percentile · 25th national percentile2013: 2 acres · 10th regional percentile · 17th national percentile2014: 5 acres · 13th regional percentile · 16th national percentile2015: 6 acres · 32nd regional percentile · 17th national percentile2016: 19 acres · 23rd regional percentile · 21st national percentile2017: 86 acres · 10th regional percentile · 27th national percentile2018: 44 acres · 15th regional percentile · 24th national percentile2019: 14 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 17th national percentile2020: 29 acres · 12th regional percentile · 19th national percentile2021: 7 acres · 6th regional percentile · 15th national percentile2022: 21 acres · 9th regional percentile · 18th national percentile2023: 42 acres · 13th regional percentile · 22nd national percentile2024: 0 acres · 18th regional percentile · 12th national percentile2025: 1 acres · 10th regional percentile · 17th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

37.8production depth
Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL
2,198 acres

Lewis County · 2022

How calculated

Lewis County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53041:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2,198 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ebb96424c6782aeb393865dc7c25
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL
46 farms

Lewis County · 2022

How calculated

Lewis County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53041:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
46 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4d90bbc10a96a4532b4656276b10
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
271 acres

Lewis County · 2022

How calculated

Lewis County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53041:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
271 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1b9087385421be168457a63a2935
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
14 farms

Lewis County · 2022

How calculated

Lewis County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53041:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
14 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1d7433a403f053c861de58f56c71
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
12.3 percent

Lewis County · 2022

How calculated

Lewis County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53041:alfalfa:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c6c723aa5bdf086d7ff9d69da03e
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL
4,348 tons

Lewis County · 2022

How calculated

Lewis County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53041:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
4,348 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ddaab1dc9d1106d7f8056982576a
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL
2 tons/acre

Lewis County · 2022

How calculated

Lewis County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53041:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:eeab68ab3052a7a96948845e3326
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
7,051 head

Lewis County · 2022

How calculated

Lewis County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53041:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
7,051 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:028f63064936aea551e987ac66bb
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
20,014 head

Lewis County · 2022

How calculated

Lewis County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53041:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
20,014 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8f8567d6c1ff741ffd3347529e35
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
3,631 head

Lewis County · 2022

How calculated

Lewis County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53041:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3,631 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2cdc54bc9b63844fb6739b0b2406
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
2,016 head

Lewis County · 2022

How calculated

Lewis County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53041:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2,016 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:37531cf398f6e000f8260ca95ce6
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.7 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Lewis County · 2022

How calculated

Lewis County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53041:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7ae9eff2428ff3d1c0d513d05fa3
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation82.6 in
How calculated

LONGMIRE RAINIER NPS, WA US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4e1fe6fe7e258d0c09731f8531a1
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature44.3 °F
How calculated

LONGMIRE RAINIER NPS, WA US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:74c8d4924aecde2365ca979b83aa
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance17.8 miles
How calculated

LONGMIRE RAINIER NPS, WA US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Mineral reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ae97538ec5606705a50077961626
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
2.1 percent

Mineral · 2026

How calculated

Mineral · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f40d65f66fef8b8db5443c4bff0f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Mineral · 2026

How calculated

Mineral · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:eebf1b9c0102e3bf8b0561653060
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Mineral · 2026

How calculated

Mineral · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f8b9ad1259f43b04cd14b8af1ef2
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D0 category

Mineral · 2026

How calculated

Mineral · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0a9f793e0350527171f4aa772801
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
14.1 0-100

Mineral · 2026

How calculated

Mineral · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0de2068855a46d7ad9b4ab003508
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Mineral · 2026

How calculated

Mineral · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:021ff873fb06ce0fc0b599f9d6d2
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
15 weeks

Mineral · 2026

How calculated

Mineral · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d1d44ecfdd66ea6a47aace5bcbc3
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
2.6 0-100

Mineral · 2026

How calculated

Mineral · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7ee86c000cfd6613444f8efd0388
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
7.2 0-100

Mineral · 2026

How calculated

Mineral · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d2ef43a8861f5e11d89b9af87ace
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
14.1 0-100

Mineral · 2026

How calculated

Mineral · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:fb2b6cc466198bd34619066b54a2
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
28.6 percent

Mineral · 2026

How calculated

Mineral · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f8d37db3f32d446f7a8d3fc93657
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
11.6 percent

Mineral · 2026

How calculated

Mineral · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c91b1f440b185b20ffbe5acf558f
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

61.4sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Alfalfa Hay in Longbranch, Washington44.3 mi220 ac97.82. Alfalfa Hay in Anderson Island, Washington37.8 mi217 ac973. Alfalfa Hay in Ketron Island, Washington36.9 mi213 ac95.64. Alfalfa Hay in Tanglewilde, Washington36.3 mi198 ac90.65. Alfalfa Hay in Lacey, Washington36.6 mi194 ac89.26. Alfalfa Hay in Olympia, Washington40.2 mi190 ac87.57. Alfalfa Hay in Fox Island, Washington43.1 mi185 ac85.78. Alfalfa Hay in Tumwater, Washington39.3 mi180 ac84.49. Alfalfa Hay in Artondale, Washington46 mi167 ac79.510. Alfalfa Hay in DuPont, Washington34.5 mi163 ac78.6
Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Mineral?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Alfalfa Hay markets in Lewis Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Mineral

Barley Hay in Mineral, WashingtonContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Mineral, WashingtonContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Mineral, WashingtonContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Mineral, WashingtonContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Mineral, WashingtonContextual local forage evidence in this localityGrass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Mineral, WashingtonContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 73 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.