HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Hobart, Washington

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Hobart.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Local mapped footprint22 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth43.8 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence66.6 / 100MODERATE
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty57.5 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal59.7 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Hobart
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Hobart. The latest 2025 raster shows 22 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 16th percentile among 639 analyzed Washington localities and the 23rd percentile nationally. King County reports 708 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Lake Forest Park, Washington, 27 miles away with 180 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 43.9% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 16th percentile among analyzed Washington localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT
Within 25 miles22mapped acres · 0.002% of radius · 2025

16th percentile among 639 analyzed Washington localities · 23th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Hobart · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
99
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
99 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:20f97e9a9d3821143898b62ac105
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

66.6 / 100 persistence · MODERATE

2008: 25 acres · 13th regional percentile · 22nd national percentile2009: 56 acres · 30th regional percentile · 26th national percentile2010: 7 acres · 31st regional percentile · 20th national percentile2011: 40 acres · 33rd regional percentile · 26th national percentile2012: 11 acres · 15th regional percentile · 20th national percentile2013: 9 acres · 30th regional percentile · 21st national percentile2014: 36 acres · 32nd regional percentile · 23rd national percentile2015: 2 acres · 14th regional percentile · 15th national percentile2016: 264 acres · 39th regional percentile · 33rd national percentile2017: 141 acres · 21st regional percentile · 30th national percentile2018: 60 acres · 23rd regional percentile · 25th national percentile2019: 153 acres · 36th regional percentile · 29th national percentile2020: 113 acres · 32nd regional percentile · 26th national percentile2021: 129 acres · 36th regional percentile · 28th national percentile2022: 129 acres · 34th regional percentile · 29th national percentile2023: 112 acres · 33rd regional percentile · 28th national percentile2024: 2 acres · 26th regional percentile · 15th national percentile2025: 22 acres · 16th regional percentile · 23rd national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

43.8production depth
Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL
708 acres

King County · 2022

How calculated

King County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53033:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
708 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:846e826cae4e25c688bd2f98a3ec
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL
19 farms

King County · 2022

How calculated

King County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53033:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
19 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3752112ee595da14f5f5adbfe9cd
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
366 acres

King County · 2022

How calculated

King County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53033:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
366 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1d02d22b4610a3642b3285fe316d
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
6 farms

King County · 2022

How calculated

King County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53033:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
6 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a643c822b40e2d57d7a88b3bec35
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
51.7 percent

King County · 2022

How calculated

King County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53033:alfalfa:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:65c29b16397e05580b903a1780e6
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL
942 tons

King County · 2022

How calculated

King County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53033:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
942 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6cb91134bb92a9d57a9a095f8694
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL
1.3 tons/acre

King County · 2022

How calculated

King County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53033:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6c51d729f57ba020811d9919785a
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
2,550 head

King County · 2022

How calculated

King County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53033:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2,550 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:63f9e2b13efccdaef5e87b166ec3
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
13,377 head

King County · 2022

How calculated

King County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53033:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
13,377 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c7e57f831d4392fd1cf6691ba548
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
5,533 head

King County · 2022

How calculated

King County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53033:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
5,533 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:de9f82a790379d69a7f3d01ac421
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
4,573 head

King County · 2022

How calculated

King County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53033:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
4,573 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5dfe08ebcec7c1aadcb9174d3d23
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.2 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

King County · 2022

How calculated

King County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
53033:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7a80957d8028eb636ca78923b77e
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation59.7 in
How calculated

LANDSBURG, WA US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0ec9eea311ace1dd28b5515eb685
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature50.5 °F
How calculated

LANDSBURG, WA US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:34152a2343a35bc428d46b4e571a
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance3.2 miles
How calculated

LANDSBURG, WA US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Hobart reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c7683f1be3e5d8d3b0dd6f509942
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
43.9 percent

Hobart · 2026

How calculated

Hobart · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7466a4b435acc09f1c1e233495b2
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Hobart · 2026

How calculated

Hobart · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:527a22ebe0bbd929494be971972f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Hobart · 2026

How calculated

Hobart · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2723a07fc247a82ed909d79ee073
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D0 category

Hobart · 2026

How calculated

Hobart · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:725badde2e40082801b50adefb0e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
28.8 0-100

Hobart · 2026

How calculated

Hobart · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:533e5fea5434e2e041f617d0c11c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Hobart · 2026

How calculated

Hobart · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c565c508b77414221729d3300af1
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
16 weeks

Hobart · 2026

How calculated

Hobart · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c91763d118ccd690dda7c681bc2d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
1.1 0-100

Hobart · 2026

How calculated

Hobart · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3c8ecbc744241f55f3d41f0f48ae
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
11.8 0-100

Hobart · 2026

How calculated

Hobart · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:34df9e1f7b08b4bc2968ab1e8a51
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
20.1 0-100

Hobart · 2026

How calculated

Hobart · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:84d1a8b94fba48fdedb6d4073e1c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
33.1 percent

Hobart · 2026

How calculated

Hobart · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:070ae09b30b9c54648df5c6f131a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
26.9 percent

Hobart · 2026

How calculated

Hobart · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c3bbfe5671096938
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e183d08965175f067e751d21096b
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

57.5sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Alfalfa Hay in Lake Forest Park, Washington27.4 mi180 ac98.62. Alfalfa Hay in Kenmore, Washington25.9 mi151 ac86.43. Alfalfa Hay in Canterwood, Washington28 mi150 ac85.84. Alfalfa Hay in Bothell, Washington26.7 mi145 ac83.95. Alfalfa Hay in Purdy, Washington28 mi143 ac83.26. Alfalfa Hay in Maltby, Washington27.4 mi131 ac78.17. Alfalfa Hay in Woodinville, Washington24.8 mi129 ac77.68. Alfalfa Hay in Kirkland, Washington21.8 mi124 ac75.49. Alfalfa Hay in Fircrest, Washington27 mi105 ac67.410. Alfalfa Hay in Ruston, Washington25 mi102 ac66.2
Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Hobart?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Alfalfa Hay markets in King Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Hobart

Barley Hay in Hobart, WashingtonContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Hobart, WashingtonContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Hobart, WashingtonContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Hobart, WashingtonContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Hobart, WashingtonContextual local forage evidence in this localityGrass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Hobart, WashingtonContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 73 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.