HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Orderville, Utah

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Orderville.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Local mapped footprint2,271.5 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth46.9 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence91.8 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty57.2 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal17.3 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Orderville
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Orderville. The latest 2025 raster shows 2,272 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 8th percentile among 334 analyzed Utah localities and the 51st percentile nationally. Kane County reports 1,679 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Meadow, Utah, 114 miles away with 32,001 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 62% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 8th percentile among analyzed Utah localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT
Within 25 miles2,272mapped acres · 0.181% of radius · 2025

8th percentile among 334 analyzed Utah localities · 51th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Orderville · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
10214
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
10214 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:59d86f26bad10f22921712ab1d1d
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

91.8 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 3,181 acres · 7th regional percentile · 55th national percentile2009: 3,511 acres · 9th regional percentile · 58th national percentile2010: 3,209 acres · 8th regional percentile · 56th national percentile2011: 3,781 acres · 8th regional percentile · 54th national percentile2012: 1,705 acres · 6th regional percentile · 51st national percentile2013: 1,755 acres · 6th regional percentile · 51st national percentile2014: 3,484 acres · 10th regional percentile · 56th national percentile2015: 2,865 acres · 6th regional percentile · 53rd national percentile2016: 3,438 acres · 9th regional percentile · 55th national percentile2017: 3,098 acres · 6th regional percentile · 54th national percentile2018: 3,688 acres · 7th regional percentile · 56th national percentile2019: 4,018 acres · 7th regional percentile · 56th national percentile2020: 4,127 acres · 8th regional percentile · 56th national percentile2021: 3,929 acres · 7th regional percentile · 57th national percentile2022: 3,660 acres · 7th regional percentile · 57th national percentile2023: 3,619 acres · 8th regional percentile · 58th national percentile2024: 2,008 acres · 17th regional percentile · 59th national percentile2025: 2,272 acres · 8th regional percentile · 51st national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

46.9production depth
Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL
1,679 acres

Kane County · 2022

How calculated

Kane County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49025:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,679 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:43782ac1ddfe4becebb94b9a442d
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL
48 farms

Kane County · 2022

How calculated

Kane County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49025:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
48 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0e654501d154781da55bdd977d73
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
1,679 acres

Kane County · 2022

How calculated

Kane County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49025:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,679 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7108c13386b0f8006a45e58be2ed
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
48 farms

Kane County · 2022

How calculated

Kane County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49025:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
48 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1e4918423d16d29b4aa2f4d09470
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
100 percent

Kane County · 2022

How calculated

Kane County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49025:alfalfa:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:03abcb3692ef5c6f6afe71d18c60
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL
5,488 tons

Kane County · 2022

How calculated

Kane County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49025:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
5,488 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ea10c786f6347f01b7527e4096b3
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL
3.3 tons/acre

Kane County · 2022

How calculated

Kane County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49025:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7871d37e9cc54483a0a7c86b03ea
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
5,455 head

Kane County · 2022

How calculated

Kane County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49025:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
5,455 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bf9303b39c1fd85e616c47e7d374
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
8,998 head

Kane County · 2022

How calculated

Kane County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49025:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
8,998 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c5bff6900ac84834564ab8375ad8
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
- head

Kane County · 2022

How calculated

Kane County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49025:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0010c919ee075b9387742488a34e
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
536 head

Kane County · 2022

How calculated

Kane County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49025:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
536 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bab78f2887ae7558d04c09ddd3f0
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.2 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Kane County · 2022

How calculated

Kane County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49025:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:cad9b0b85637dc1a77654c6393ed
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation17.3 in
How calculated

ALTON, UT US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:98e468bda7f1ed75c49e3a078aef
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature47.3 °F
How calculated

ALTON, UT US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d64f33c0510898b564860b13afc0
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance16.2 miles
How calculated

ALTON, UT US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Orderville reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e5f9bb62d1355f3e01445db5b687
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Orderville · 2026

How calculated

Orderville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:351f73aeaa0da7d4fd4c2972062e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
62 percent

Orderville · 2026

How calculated

Orderville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1112460eac8f70ad34559160d2a2
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Orderville · 2026

How calculated

Orderville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1c9e0c98d7bac259799f9ade094c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D2 category

Orderville · 2026

How calculated

Orderville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ed51e8d2e3203913534ba337afc2
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
52.4 0-100

Orderville · 2026

How calculated

Orderville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0060cefd3655c27b9bcca84daf09
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Orderville · 2026

How calculated

Orderville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c492243292dcd695437cedc81cd0
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
53 weeks

Orderville · 2026

How calculated

Orderville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:218bb32f90a92736ca3667f09b3a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
54.3 0-100

Orderville · 2026

How calculated

Orderville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6d3094f8710bb20d5045e93e3d8b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
40 0-100

Orderville · 2026

How calculated

Orderville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0638341f1fc410bfdb6c01c24459
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
52.4 0-100

Orderville · 2026

How calculated

Orderville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4382544398689e79302af7e3bcf0
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Orderville · 2026

How calculated

Orderville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5a3a75a9069be92535005c2fe3c7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
52.2 percent

Orderville · 2026

How calculated

Orderville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:466cecb8e61fed752a6a649a26a3
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

57.2sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Alfalfa Hay in Meadow, Utah113.8 mi32,001 ac94.32. Alfalfa Hay in Richfield, Utah108.7 mi31,328 ac933. Alfalfa Hay in Kanosh, Utah107.7 mi29,734 ac89.34. Alfalfa Hay in Newcastle, Utah57.3 mi26,120 ac83.45. Alfalfa Hay in Beaver, Utah70.8 mi26,274 ac836. Alfalfa Hay in Elsinore, Utah102.9 mi26,704 ac82.47. Alfalfa Hay in Central Valley, Utah104.6 mi25,864 ac80.48. Alfalfa Hay in Paragonah, Utah44.2 mi23,034 ac76.89. Alfalfa Hay in Brian Head, Utah32.9 mi22,091 ac75.110. Alfalfa Hay in Annabella, Utah105.6 mi23,388 ac74.5
Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Orderville?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Alfalfa Hay markets in Kane Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Orderville

Barley Hay in Orderville, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Orderville, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Orderville, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Orderville, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Orderville, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this localityGrass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Orderville, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 73 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.