HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Hildale, Utah

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Hildale.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Local mapped footprint1,944.6 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth44.5 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence87.5 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty58.6 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal14.3 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Hildale
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Hildale. The latest 2025 raster shows 1,945 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 6th percentile among 334 analyzed Utah localities and the 49th percentile nationally. Washington County reports 4,104 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Newcastle, Utah, 54 miles away with 26,120 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 100% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 6th percentile among analyzed Utah localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT
Within 25 miles1,945mapped acres · 0.155% of radius · 2025

6th percentile among 334 analyzed Utah localities · 49th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Hildale · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
8744
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
8744 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:da72d4ffbe33400acd233b989c81
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

87.5 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 3,064 acres · 7th regional percentile · 55th national percentile2009: 2,402 acres · 5th regional percentile · 54th national percentile2010: 3,430 acres · 9th regional percentile · 57th national percentile2011: 2,989 acres · 6th regional percentile · 52nd national percentile2012: 1,374 acres · 4th regional percentile · 49th national percentile2013: 1,190 acres · 5th regional percentile · 47th national percentile2014: 2,663 acres · 7th regional percentile · 53rd national percentile2015: 3,950 acres · 9th regional percentile · 56th national percentile2016: 2,210 acres · 5th regional percentile · 50th national percentile2017: 4,319 acres · 9th regional percentile · 58th national percentile2018: 4,157 acres · 8th regional percentile · 57th national percentile2019: 4,942 acres · 8th regional percentile · 59th national percentile2020: 3,421 acres · 6th regional percentile · 54th national percentile2021: 3,387 acres · 5th regional percentile · 56th national percentile2022: 2,691 acres · 5th regional percentile · 54th national percentile2023: 2,509 acres · 5th regional percentile · 54th national percentile2024: 1,358 acres · 10th regional percentile · 56th national percentile2025: 1,945 acres · 7th regional percentile · 49th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

44.5production depth
Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL
4,104 acres

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49053:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
4,104 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e01f5c272c432ea2d6b594945bed
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL
106 farms

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49053:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
106 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1c46ea9b747253ba3b9978e43104
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
(D) acres

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49053:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d55ae8a957c76e9079b8e44034da
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
104 farms

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49053:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
104 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9e49b144ab276cee758a6c29fc4a
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL
12,088 tons

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49053:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
12,088 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:185f2068776c6e635178740f5172
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL
2.9 tons/acre

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49053:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ca53dbf8dbf718b2a443a3c2f53b
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
6,627 head

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49053:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
6,627 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a8f60d206a612d1ee8d567da7d4c
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
11,148 head

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49053:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
11,148 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b31fca199b2372dff48961bf3375
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
35 head

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49053:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
35 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:280eb615aafbb66c95ddd6a7755f
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
1,297 head

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49053:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,297 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3c40fcc0389cce8d8b8362a7a528
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.4 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49053:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d8b31bc073c32b427dfd35065a1f
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
635 head

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49053:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
635 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:883a97b2f9f01e59df9100f0ac59
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation14.3 in
How calculated

COLORADO CITY, AZ US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:cf5f06f60442b95986ccf2b24dde
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature56.1 °F
How calculated

COLORADO CITY, AZ US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:961fbb88448a943946c2fd2d5947
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance2.2 miles
How calculated

COLORADO CITY, AZ US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Hildale reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5216c969d95d4b6c25011dfdd963
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Hildale · 2026

How calculated

Hildale · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ed026e33b343e2deee65057485f0
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Hildale · 2026

How calculated

Hildale · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a5622e8d2a5851ffd32d30cf9e35
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Hildale · 2026

How calculated

Hildale · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:bc79521c436ac8f6a18690b4a1b0
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D2 category

Hildale · 2026

How calculated

Hildale · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d4b00180161343110ab300059143
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
60 0-100

Hildale · 2026

How calculated

Hildale · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a7eb3bcf4ab85b990f30a0ed44bc
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Hildale · 2026

How calculated

Hildale · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:59db605e84cacbcc3c6c9836835e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
53 weeks

Hildale · 2026

How calculated

Hildale · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c665c1def56b90b80fda9b23cffa
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
60 0-100

Hildale · 2026

How calculated

Hildale · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:12083ae269faa8fd83a85c0b09ce
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
40 0-100

Hildale · 2026

How calculated

Hildale · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:553e201d6a3b875abbf28506b30b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
60 0-100

Hildale · 2026

How calculated

Hildale · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7fe04b545528e1004a90d6103042
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Hildale · 2026

How calculated

Hildale · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e56172eb6fad29ea3175bff49dfa
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
66.4 percent

Hildale · 2026

How calculated

Hildale · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:cf6d9cd29ff6dd9ef26c5467582a
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

58.6sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Alfalfa Hay in Newcastle, Utah54.4 mi26,120 ac96.82. Alfalfa Hay in Beaver, Utah89.3 mi26,274 ac95.53. Alfalfa Hay in Paragonah, Utah61.4 mi23,034 ac87.74. Alfalfa Hay in Brian Head, Utah48.6 mi22,091 ac85.65. Alfalfa Hay in New Harmony, Utah36.3 mi21,655 ac856. Alfalfa Hay in Cedar City, Utah46.5 mi21,482 ac847. Alfalfa Hay in Parowan, Utah57.2 mi21,631 ac83.98. Alfalfa Hay in Summit, Utah54.7 mi21,546 ac83.89. Alfalfa Hay in Enoch, Utah52 mi21,408 ac83.510. Alfalfa Hay in Beryl Junction, Utah59.4 mi21,184 ac82.5
Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Hildale?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Alfalfa Hay markets in Washington Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Hildale

Barley Hay in Hildale, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Hildale, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Hildale, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Hildale, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Hildale, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this localityGrass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Hildale, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 70 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.