HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Hanksville, Utah

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Hanksville.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Local mapped footprint466.1 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth41.9 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence84.2 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty63.7 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal6.2 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Hanksville
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Hanksville. The latest 2025 raster shows 466 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 3rd percentile among 334 analyzed Utah localities and the 36th percentile nationally. Wayne County reports 8,818 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Holden, Utah, 98 miles away with 46,418 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 100% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureHIGH
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 3rd percentile among analyzed Utah localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT
Within 25 miles466mapped acres · 0.037% of radius · 2025

3th percentile among 334 analyzed Utah localities · 36th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Hanksville · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
2096
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2096 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1aa2e1c806e9676ee2b5b7ddc60d
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

84.2 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 563 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 38th national percentile2009: 239 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 34th national percentile2010: 865 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 42nd national percentile2011: 993 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 43rd national percentile2012: 464 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 40th national percentile2013: 626 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 41st national percentile2014: 324 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 35th national percentile2015: 765 acres · 4th regional percentile · 41st national percentile2016: 942 acres · 4th regional percentile · 42nd national percentile2017: 1,142 acres · 4th regional percentile · 44th national percentile2018: 1,062 acres · 4th regional percentile · 42nd national percentile2019: 1,293 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 43rd national percentile2020: 1,419 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 45th national percentile2021: 1,427 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 46th national percentile2022: 1,555 acres · 4th regional percentile · 48th national percentile2023: 1,441 acres · 4th regional percentile · 48th national percentile2024: 585 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 47th national percentile2025: 466 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 36th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

41.9production depth
Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL
8,818 acres

Wayne County · 2022

How calculated

Wayne County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49055:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
8,818 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8e0cb80ca0c36f5ec2e6bacdccf6
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL
115 farms

Wayne County · 2022

How calculated

Wayne County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49055:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
115 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3bb9c2c437721101afd71d19ec9a
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
(D) acres

Wayne County · 2022

How calculated

Wayne County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49055:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b8367c2d07c913eecb0ac10aa3db
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
114 farms

Wayne County · 2022

How calculated

Wayne County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49055:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
114 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5dafcf23051f6c46889b0173c0c3
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL
27,703 tons

Wayne County · 2022

How calculated

Wayne County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49055:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
27,703 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e5bd7bfe995ddc483e1b446875fe
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL
3.1 tons/acre

Wayne County · 2022

How calculated

Wayne County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49055:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c117b24abf3994610d957b8e8f04
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Wayne County · 2022

How calculated

Wayne County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49055:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c972f6ff8238f3ad2c0a5e09b4cf
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
12,451 head

Wayne County · 2022

How calculated

Wayne County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49055:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
12,451 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2ddcb3c7d01e5da26652bc53b473
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Wayne County · 2022

How calculated

Wayne County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49055:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b092c6dad2e672dea41405117e4d
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
355 head

Wayne County · 2022

How calculated

Wayne County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49055:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
355 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:12b30e13335eca4ee307bb6c662b
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.8 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Wayne County · 2022

How calculated

Wayne County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49055:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e12716c02b2f2cb09495811e58f6
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
(D) head

Wayne County · 2022

How calculated

Wayne County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49055:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:68822f2b8d30b2409ee00b6c48b0
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation6.2 in
How calculated

HANKSVILLE, UT US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3628024d35627ca13b69acd5d06a
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature53.9 °F
How calculated

HANKSVILLE, UT US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c80e165c7db7fc8a24491a3df512
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance0.1 miles
How calculated

HANKSVILLE, UT US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Hanksville reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:29d77d6d8077cb023a947c094cba
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Hanksville · 2026

How calculated

Hanksville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:61319bd38bd724b9191c08e37eb7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Hanksville · 2026

How calculated

Hanksville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:717b847d06193c1adff399722b75
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
50.7 percent

Hanksville · 2026

How calculated

Hanksville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9f23aef84fed61e69e145d056430
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D3 category

Hanksville · 2026

How calculated

Hanksville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8a0caba825f0f38b94058f56ca0c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
70.1 0-100

Hanksville · 2026

How calculated

Hanksville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3460d1b2437f83f3a3f3c74a33b2
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Hanksville · 2026

How calculated

Hanksville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d24b0363a759554a42de99770f19
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
53 weeks

Hanksville · 2026

How calculated

Hanksville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:930bb199ff5432a02cd728b22439
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
72.7 0-100

Hanksville · 2026

How calculated

Hanksville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c646ce10bb803da6b53e8493aea0
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
60 0-100

Hanksville · 2026

How calculated

Hanksville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:06398a9d2105d8014d8cd07e0527
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
70.1 0-100

Hanksville · 2026

How calculated

Hanksville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5bc6e4b430bb15cb64ffaba02337
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Hanksville · 2026

How calculated

Hanksville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9479b0affbe424501a3e86a95e9b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
99.6 percent

Hanksville · 2026

How calculated

Hanksville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:46b96299a3e746a8ef482096569e
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

63.7sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Alfalfa Hay in Holden, Utah97.8 mi46,418 ac95.12. Alfalfa Hay in Scipio, Utah96.3 mi36,028 ac78.43. Alfalfa Hay in Fillmore, Utah96.8 mi34,997 ac76.74. Alfalfa Hay in Sigurd, Utah75.6 mi31,812 ac72.65. Alfalfa Hay in Manti, Utah79.3 mi31,454 ac71.96. Alfalfa Hay in Meadow, Utah98.1 mi32,001 ac71.87. Alfalfa Hay in Richfield, Utah79.2 mi31,328 ac71.78. Alfalfa Hay in Aurora, Utah76 mi30,496 ac70.59. Alfalfa Hay in Fayette, Utah85.1 mi30,782 ac70.510. Alfalfa Hay in Oak City, Utah111.5 mi31,615 ac70.5
Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Hanksville?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Alfalfa Hay markets in Wayne Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Hanksville

Barley Hay in Hanksville, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Hanksville, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Hanksville, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Hanksville, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Hanksville, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this localityGrass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Hanksville, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 71 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.