Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Echo, Utah

Name: Alfalfa market intelligence for Echo, Utah
Creator: HayQuotes
License: https://hayquotes.com/terms

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Echo.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Echo

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT

Local mapped footprint7,142.4 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth59 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence89.7 / 100HIGH

Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS

Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS

Sourcing difficulty51.6 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal14.7 in1991–2020 NORMAL

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Echo

Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Echo. The latest 2025 raster shows 7,142 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 31st percentile among 334 analyzed Utah localities and the 67th percentile nationally. Summit County reports 9,392 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Paradise, Utah, 46 miles away with 60,016 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 75.8% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED

Local supplyMODERATE

Nearby sourcingSTRONG

Drought pressureMODERATE

MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 31st percentile among analyzed Utah localities.

Trace this statement

usda-cdl-2025-30m

Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT

5 mi

718 ac

10 mi

2,559 ac

25 mi

7,142 ac

50 mi

29,172 ac

100 mi

266,225 ac

150 mi

510,635 ac

250 mi

1,376,059 ac

Within 25 miles7,142mapped acres · 0.568% of radius · 2025

31th percentile among 334 analyzed Utah localities · 67th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Echo · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source: usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot: usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record: 32116
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2025-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 32116 classified pixels
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:29506dbe946a39d9f7b386fdcc70
Official record: Open source ↗

Footprint history

89.7 / 100 persistence · HIGH

20082025

Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

59production depth

Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL

9,392 acres

Summit County · 2022

How calculated

Summit County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 49043:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 9,392 acres
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:1de630d9ae4a9bcb0701f89fa8fa
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL

232 farms

Summit County · 2022

How calculated

Summit County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 49043:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 232 farms
Normalized unit: farms
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:b726c3f3d164778210829f3150f1
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL

8,780 acres

Summit County · 2022

How calculated

Summit County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 49043:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 8,780 acres
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:29e5ca8cb59ac18dd99594def258
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL

217 farms

Summit County · 2022

How calculated

Summit County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 49043:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 217 farms
Normalized unit: farms
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:2ebc3483bfb89b174272006e9c84
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL

93.5 percent

Summit County · 2022

How calculated

Summit County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 49043:alfalfa:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:f3a292822c93ad4979efe8644905
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL

26,193 tons

Summit County · 2022

How calculated

Summit County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 49043:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 26,193 tons
Normalized unit: tons
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:3d4fc087495f8982ae3c8e1e917c
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL

2.8 tons/acre

Summit County · 2022

How calculated

Summit County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 49043:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: tons/acre
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:2f164ec310291cdce700cfd4199d
Official record: Open source ↗

Beef CattleHISTORICAL

(D) head

Summit County · 2022

How calculated

Summit County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 49043:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: (D) head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:46f1f199b134e4350fd2c1e2bdf6
Official record: Open source ↗

CattleHISTORICAL

22,238 head

Summit County · 2022

How calculated

Summit County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 49043:cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 22,238 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:aea0cba43fad8c5383e0ab0dc115
Official record: Open source ↗

Dairy CattleHISTORICAL

(D) head

Summit County · 2022

How calculated

Summit County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 49043:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: (D) head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:90ac8bac277aeaea8c026cb9e3ea
Official record: Open source ↗

EquineHISTORICAL

2,551 head

Summit County · 2022

How calculated

Summit County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 49043:equine:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 2,551 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:5878fe1d01220ac901047a529754
Official record: Open source ↗

Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL

0.4 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Summit County · 2022

How calculated

Summit County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 49043:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:3a02a2219dd2f6590f4df954c734
Official record: Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation14.7 in

How calculated

ECHO DAM, UT US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: in
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:1014480d00b8fee4a1c73aebc1e1
Official record: Open source ↗

Annual mean temperature46.4 °F

How calculated

ECHO DAM, UT US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: °F
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:36c3573f06c9814b72c1520c0b39
Official record: Open source ↗

Station distance1.1 miles

How calculated

ECHO DAM, UT US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Echo reference point to the official station.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: miles
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:17d025bc20d041f7de5995b17a3c
Official record: Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST

100 percent

Echo · 2026

How calculated

Echo · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record: drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:364ea38533cb2c0c05709f4802ab
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST

75.8 percent

Echo · 2026

How calculated

Echo · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record: drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:d8ef96b9c4ab6bdb3ea049bf16a7
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST

0 percent

Echo · 2026

How calculated

Echo · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record: drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:6558b02f844160c4766865ae51f4
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST

D2 category

Echo · 2026

How calculated

Echo · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record: drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: category
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:87dd5e3c8d07f8c801c376a8bbd8
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST

55.2 0-100

Echo · 2026

How calculated

Echo · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record: drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:ba9ce716af9dcca3c6191fbdd2a5
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Four Week TrendLATEST

STABLE category

Echo · 2026

How calculated

Echo · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record: drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: category
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:eebe5e94e4afe11a818414a507cc
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST

53 weeks

Echo · 2026

How calculated

Echo · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record: drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: weeks
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:ba9673bddf5549165e70499a851f
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST

60 0-100

Echo · 2026

How calculated

Echo · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record: drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-06-09
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:508e92a92f1d5953c0506854d3bf
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST

53.5 0-100

Echo · 2026

How calculated

Echo · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record: drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-03-03
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:05e48d588b292b07e07b78ddf554
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST

55.2 0-100

Echo · 2026

How calculated

Echo · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record: drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-08-04
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:7f12e5504e5522957c38842c96a9
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST

100 percent

Echo · 2026

How calculated

Echo · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record: drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:c6e980ba465935c639120bf24eb2
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST

82.1 percent

Echo · 2026

How calculated

Echo · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record: drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:8f7890ba33a9703213c3dc281a12
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.

Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Bale countWeight per bale (lb)

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Pickup price / baleLoaded route milesFreight / loaded mileUnloading totalStacking totalOther chargesPayload / load

Delivered total$0.00

Delivered equivalent—

Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Pickup price / baleLoaded route milesFreight / loaded mileUnloading totalStacking totalOther chargesPayload / load

Delivered total$0.00

Delivered equivalent—

Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.

Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

51.6sourcing difficulty

Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength

1. Alfalfa Hay in Paradise, Utah45.5 mi60,016 ac97.7 2. Alfalfa Hay in Mantua, Utah44.1 mi53,962 ac90.2 3. Alfalfa Hay in Avon, Utah43 mi50,970 ac86.5 4. Alfalfa Hay in Perry, Utah45.8 mi48,856 ac83.8 5. Alfalfa Hay in Willard, Utah42.9 mi41,841 ac75.1 6. Alfalfa Hay in South Willard, Utah41 mi35,361 ac67.1 7. Alfalfa Hay in Liberty, Utah33.4 mi30,905 ac62 8. Alfalfa Hay in Pleasant View, Utah37.7 mi30,326 ac61 9. Alfalfa Hay in North Ogden, Utah35.6 mi28,621 ac59 10. Alfalfa Hay in Wolf Creek, Utah31.3 mi28,306 ac58.8

Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Echo?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Alfalfa Hay markets in Summit Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Echo

Barley Hay in Echo, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this locality Bermudagrass Hay in Echo, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this locality Brome Hay in Echo, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this locality Clover Hay in Echo, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this locality Fescue Hay in Echo, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this locality Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Echo, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this locality

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station

1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗

National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics

rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter

202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level

2022countyOfficial source ↗

Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 73 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.

Alfalfa Hayin Echo, Utah

What the local hay data shows

What the evidence says now

Local alfalfa footprint

Footprint history

Production & livestock context

Price intelligence

Local climate context

Drought & moisture context

Visible supply & verified demand

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

Quote A

Quote B

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Need Alfalfa Hay in Echo?

Continue through the evidence graph

County and agricultural-region markets

Other strongly supported hay types in Echo

Methodology & sources

Alfalfa Hay
in Echo, Utah