Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Eagle Mountain, Utah

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Eagle Mountain.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Local mapped footprint17,178.7 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth72.2 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence91.5 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty44.7 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal12.5 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Eagle Mountain. The latest 2025 raster shows 17,179 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 54th percentile among 334 analyzed Utah localities and the 84th percentile nationally. Utah County reports 21,615 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Mona, Utah, 36 miles away with 31,541 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 100% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureHIGH
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 54th percentile among analyzed Utah localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT

Footprint history

91.5 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 52,051 acres · 73rd regional percentile · 94th national percentile2009: 29,982 acres · 53rd regional percentile · 89th national percentile2010: 39,762 acres · 60th regional percentile · 91st national percentile2011: 34,037 acres · 54th regional percentile · 88th national percentile2012: 33,835 acres · 54th regional percentile · 89th national percentile2013: 27,749 acres · 54th regional percentile · 88th national percentile2014: 35,516 acres · 53rd regional percentile · 90th national percentile2015: 37,127 acres · 54th regional percentile · 88th national percentile2016: 33,484 acres · 51st regional percentile · 87th national percentile2017: 36,079 acres · 53rd regional percentile · 89th national percentile2018: 36,586 acres · 55th regional percentile · 89th national percentile2019: 35,934 acres · 54th regional percentile · 88th national percentile2020: 36,606 acres · 53rd regional percentile · 88th national percentile2021: 36,822 acres · 52nd regional percentile · 89th national percentile2022: 34,691 acres · 51st regional percentile · 89th national percentile2023: 34,688 acres · 51st regional percentile · 89th national percentile2024: 12,336 acres · 50th regional percentile · 82nd national percentile2025: 17,179 acres · 54th regional percentile · 84th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

72.2production depth
Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL
21,615 acres

Utah County · 2022

How calculated

Utah County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49049:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
21,615 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d4e9b5a8f4b07d59fbfdad36fe65
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL
925 farms

Utah County · 2022

How calculated

Utah County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49049:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
925 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b195fc8c3741dd8e4286402d63e8
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
19,835 acres

Utah County · 2022

How calculated

Utah County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49049:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
19,835 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c9b9525841748f7d1aab7c24e479
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
887 farms

Utah County · 2022

How calculated

Utah County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49049:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
887 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f510ff67c279d41a9a0ae763601b
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
91.8 percent

Utah County · 2022

How calculated

Utah County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49049:alfalfa:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4fdec1fedeb404c4bd90b2442164
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL
89,547 tons

Utah County · 2022

How calculated

Utah County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49049:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
89,547 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:25126a76d6324f3a6556f98ae7c6
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL
4.1 tons/acre

Utah County · 2022

How calculated

Utah County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49049:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:664a6ccb60185b90ed75d26be1df
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
23,060 head

Utah County · 2022

How calculated

Utah County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49049:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
23,060 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:cccc06d6471940c96b01e8a74f92
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
60,188 head

Utah County · 2022

How calculated

Utah County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49049:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
60,188 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4a363ffe68f6bf7330e077ba16ca
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
15,230 head

Utah County · 2022

How calculated

Utah County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49049:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
15,230 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d2a3ac39ed8dc6dbd044202ddf0f
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
7,353 head

Utah County · 2022

How calculated

Utah County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49049:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
7,353 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e74c76970bbfc4c667b16329e13b
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.4 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Utah County · 2022

How calculated

Utah County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49049:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:65684cd6f2ee47a35efd859fa200
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation12.5 in
How calculated

FAIRFIELD, UT US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d0b79f17ed973206e330ccac4063
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature47.6 °F
How calculated

FAIRFIELD, UT US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:40b3e9c0eed946a1a92373890581
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance5.5 miles
How calculated

FAIRFIELD, UT US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Eagle Mountain reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:62197e575ef52755c3ed7f20dc81
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Eagle Mountain · 2026

How calculated

Eagle Mountain · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:095e0ea73c068562aa0abc35c7fb
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Eagle Mountain · 2026

How calculated

Eagle Mountain · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c5fb82ce532b5c30ea2129abd13b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
64.6 percent

Eagle Mountain · 2026

How calculated

Eagle Mountain · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:bdc3d8dad2f8e61d67f197f2097a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D3 category

Eagle Mountain · 2026

How calculated

Eagle Mountain · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9370a5ce4a0b6a4cd58ca7ae38dd
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
72.9 0-100

Eagle Mountain · 2026

How calculated

Eagle Mountain · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:dbf53c876c55006b62331419ab0c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Eagle Mountain · 2026

How calculated

Eagle Mountain · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b4bd16aceb3fd068dab77ed46f03
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
53 weeks

Eagle Mountain · 2026

How calculated

Eagle Mountain · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:59ec3e8f6c39411998a78c1717e3
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
66.5 0-100

Eagle Mountain · 2026

How calculated

Eagle Mountain · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3062b78756f50a19c0e545ca21e2
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
48.6 0-100

Eagle Mountain · 2026

How calculated

Eagle Mountain · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b5b6bb3573abe5de00429d84484f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
65.2 0-100

Eagle Mountain · 2026

How calculated

Eagle Mountain · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:fd981ffa9f54e5acfab74ff44c5e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
99.5 percent

Eagle Mountain · 2026

How calculated

Eagle Mountain · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:70594b87d6ef90a3791a6d4bc3aa
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
59.8 percent

Eagle Mountain · 2026

How calculated

Eagle Mountain · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:09994beba6e7f3bd57458c1f8f4e
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

44.7sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Eagle Mountain?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 73 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.