Alfalfa
Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04
Alfalfa Hay
in Cedar Hills, Utah
Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Cedar Hills.
Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.
Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.
Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.
Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.
Local interpretation
What the local hay data shows
USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Cedar Hills. The latest 2025 raster shows 11,849 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 43rd percentile among 334 analyzed Utah localities and the 77th percentile nationally. Utah County reports 21,615 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Mona, Utah, 42 miles away with 31,541 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 100% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.
Buyer decision panel
What the evidence says now
Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureHIGH
MarketplaceLIMITED
The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 43rd percentile among analyzed Utah localities.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map
Local alfalfa footprint
Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.
5 mi
668 ac
10 mi
1,168 ac
25 mi
11,849 ac
50 mi
40,753 ac
100 mi
216,803 ac
150 mi
464,272 ac
250 mi
1,271,968 ac
Within 25 miles11,849mapped acres · 0.943% of radius · 2025
43th percentile among 334 analyzed Utah localities · 77th percentile nationally.
How calculated
Cedar Hills · radius
Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.
- Source
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
- Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174- Source record
53278- Evidence
- EXACT
- Period
- 2025-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 53278 classified pixels
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:e04527164cb1b62bf69d811013e4- Official record
- Open source ↗
Footprint history
89.4 / 100 persistence · HIGH
20082025
Agricultural census
Production & livestock context
The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.
65.5production depth
Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL
21,615 acresUtah County · 2022
How calculated
Utah County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
49049:alfalfa_acres:2022- Evidence
- EXACT
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 21,615 acres
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:d4e9b5a8f4b07d59fbfdad36fe65- Official record
- Open source ↗
Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL
925 farmsUtah County · 2022
How calculated
Utah County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
49049:alfalfa_farms:2022- Evidence
- EXACT
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 925 farms
- Normalized unit
- farms
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:b195fc8c3741dd8e4286402d63e8- Official record
- Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
19,835 acresUtah County · 2022
How calculated
Utah County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
49049:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022- Evidence
- EXACT
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 19,835 acres
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:c9b9525841748f7d1aab7c24e479- Official record
- Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
887 farmsUtah County · 2022
How calculated
Utah County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
49049:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022- Evidence
- EXACT
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 887 farms
- Normalized unit
- farms
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:f510ff67c279d41a9a0ae763601b- Official record
- Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
91.8 percentUtah County · 2022
How calculated
Utah County · county
Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
49049:alfalfa:irrigated-share:2022- Evidence
- EXACT
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:4fdec1fedeb404c4bd90b2442164- Official record
- Open source ↗
Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL
89,547 tonsUtah County · 2022
How calculated
Utah County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
49049:alfalfa_production:2022- Evidence
- EXACT
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 89,547 tons
- Normalized unit
- tons
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:25126a76d6324f3a6556f98ae7c6- Official record
- Open source ↗
Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL
4.1 tons/acreUtah County · 2022
How calculated
Utah County · county
Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
49049:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022- Evidence
- EXACT
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- tons/acre
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:664a6ccb60185b90ed75d26be1df- Official record
- Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
23,060 headUtah County · 2022
How calculated
Utah County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
49049:beef_cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 23,060 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:cccc06d6471940c96b01e8a74f92- Official record
- Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
60,188 headUtah County · 2022
How calculated
Utah County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
49049:cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 60,188 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:4a363ffe68f6bf7330e077ba16ca- Official record
- Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
15,230 headUtah County · 2022
How calculated
Utah County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
49049:dairy_cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 15,230 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:d2a3ac39ed8dc6dbd044202ddf0f- Official record
- Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
7,353 headUtah County · 2022
How calculated
Utah County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
49049:equine:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 7,353 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:e74c76970bbfc4c667b16329e13b- Official record
- Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.4 reported_hay_acres/reported_headUtah County · 2022
How calculated
Utah County · county
Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
49049:forage-production-livestock-context:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- reported_hay_acres/reported_head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:65684cd6f2ee47a35efd859fa200- Official record
- Open source ↗
Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.
Comparable market observations
Price intelligence
No defensible Alfalfa benchmark
No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.
Request current local quotes →Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.
Official 1991–2020 normals
Local climate context
Annual precipitation16.4 in
How calculated
PLEASANT GROVE, UT US · nearest station
Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- in
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:b8230f59aeaa4e0d0991035d2aed- Official record
- Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature54.4 °F
How calculated
PLEASANT GROVE, UT US · nearest station
Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- °F
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:720241e7f4b0ea575a355f5142fe- Official record
- Open source ↗
Station distance3.2 miles
How calculated
PLEASANT GROVE, UT US · nearest station
Great-circle distance from Cedar Hills reference point to the official station.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- miles
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:0ecea5579cbc3fcce9aa2c3886f3- Official record
- Open source ↗
Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.
Environmental pressure
Drought & moisture context
Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percentCedar Hills · 2026
How calculated
Cedar Hills · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342- Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:871799fda84c134b2758a9018bed- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
100 percentCedar Hills · 2026
How calculated
Cedar Hills · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342- Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:fc9e0f0a7bfad491126ac14885d0- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
64.6 percentCedar Hills · 2026
How calculated
Cedar Hills · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342- Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:d41a408751fcf0e4d8e95062d378- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D3 categoryCedar Hills · 2026
How calculated
Cedar Hills · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342- Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- category
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:9a40bf639a1ac8c75c39d7092ff8- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
72.9 0-100Cedar Hills · 2026
How calculated
Cedar Hills · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342- Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:8f7c43a3c5c5963afdca47fe19ea- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING categoryCedar Hills · 2026
How calculated
Cedar Hills · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342- Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- category
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:4608fd908b19b7ac763db920bbb5- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
53 weeksCedar Hills · 2026
How calculated
Cedar Hills · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342- Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- weeks
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:dac58e268a3d7897dc247780eb86- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
66.5 0-100Cedar Hills · 2026
How calculated
Cedar Hills · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342- Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-06-09
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:7a3c657ddf9f2e768aa10406a7cc- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
48.6 0-100Cedar Hills · 2026
How calculated
Cedar Hills · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342- Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-03-03
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:8f2181f800fb56237723dc48743b- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
65.2 0-100Cedar Hills · 2026
How calculated
Cedar Hills · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342- Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-08-04
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:b324175aec4fa3729ac59a0c6eb8- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
99.5 percentCedar Hills · 2026
How calculated
Cedar Hills · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342- Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:f874bde7a850e9f866016bc24abe- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
59.8 percentCedar Hills · 2026
How calculated
Cedar Hills · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342- Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:0751834c924ed4153ba061c1d156- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.
HayQuotes marketplace
Visible supply & verified demand
Coverage is still developing
No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.
Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool
Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine
No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.
Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes
Quote A
Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload
$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials
Quote B
Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload
$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials
Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph
Strong nearby sourcing candidates
Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.
48sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Alfalfa Hay in Mona, Utah41.7 mi31,541 ac97.92. Alfalfa Hay in Rocky Ridge, Utah34.2 mi28,530 ac91.13. Alfalfa Hay in Genola, Utah28.1 mi27,065 ac884. Alfalfa Hay in Goshen, Utah32.8 mi26,991 ac87.55. Alfalfa Hay in Santaquin, Utah30.6 mi26,886 ac87.46. Alfalfa Hay in Spring Lake, Utah27.9 mi26,782 ac87.37. Alfalfa Hay in Elberta, Utah33.3 mi26,533 ac86.48. Alfalfa Hay in Payson, Utah26 mi25,841 ac85.19. Alfalfa Hay in West Mountain, Utah24.9 mi25,710 ac84.910. Alfalfa Hay in Elk Ridge, Utah28 mi25,523 ac84.3Source hay
Need Alfalfa Hay in Cedar Hills?
Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.
Internal market pathways
Continue through the evidence graph
Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.
County and agricultural-region markets
Other strongly supported hay types in Cedar Hills
Barley Hay in Cedar Hills, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Cedar Hills, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Cedar Hills, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Cedar Hills, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Cedar Hills, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this localityGrass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Cedar Hills, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail
Methodology & sources
This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.
NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence
EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.
Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.
Generator: max-v1.0 · 73 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.