HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Tira, Texas

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Tira.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength65/ 100 · EXACT
Local mapped footprint0.9 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth65.8 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence65 / 100MODERATE
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty48.2 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal49.2 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Tira
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Tira. The latest 2025 raster shows 1 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 57th percentile among 1,863 analyzed Texas localities and the 17th percentile nationally. Hopkins County reports 42,966 head of beef cattle in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Albany, Oklahoma, 52 miles away with 1,144 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 0.6% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 57th percentile among analyzed Texas localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT
Within 25 miles1mapped acres · 0% of radius · 2025

57th percentile among 1,863 analyzed Texas localities · 17th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Tira · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
4
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
4 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f7bdc90ca0d2f960566de0e4e946
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

65 / 100 persistence · MODERATE

2008: 121 acres · 80th regional percentile · 30th national percentile2009: 434 acres · 90th regional percentile · 38th national percentile2010: 39 acres · 63rd regional percentile · 25th national percentile2011: 1,475 acres · 95th regional percentile · 46th national percentile2012: 184 acres · 78th regional percentile · 34th national percentile2013: 219 acres · 83rd regional percentile · 35th national percentile2014: 97 acres · 71st regional percentile · 27th national percentile2015: 433 acres · 90th regional percentile · 37th national percentile2016: 23 acres · 67th regional percentile · 22nd national percentile2017: 78 acres · 78th regional percentile · 26th national percentile2018: 105 acres · 81st regional percentile · 28th national percentile2019: 208 acres · 86th regional percentile · 30th national percentile2020: 144 acres · 79th regional percentile · 28th national percentile2021: 186 acres · 85th regional percentile · 31st national percentile2022: 101 acres · 77th regional percentile · 28th national percentile2023: 100 acres · 82nd regional percentile · 27th national percentile2024: 45 acres · 74th regional percentile · 27th national percentile2025: 1 acres · 57th regional percentile · 17th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

65.8production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
42,966 head

Hopkins County · 2022

How calculated

Hopkins County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
48223:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
42,966 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ee960353173d14ce9bce5cebd701
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
110,911 head

Hopkins County · 2022

How calculated

Hopkins County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
48223:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
110,911 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3201038f8f8c6f599473bf43fae8
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
14,145 head

Hopkins County · 2022

How calculated

Hopkins County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
48223:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
14,145 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c1b9d96009705719abc70ef66995
Official record
Open source ↗
SheepHISTORICAL
813 head

Hopkins County · 2022

How calculated

Hopkins County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
48223:sheep:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
813 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e95bfc733d7efa9025edf315cffa
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
42,966 head

Hopkins County · 2022

How calculated

Hopkins County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
48223:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
42,966 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ee960353173d14ce9bce5cebd701
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
110,911 head

Hopkins County · 2022

How calculated

Hopkins County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
48223:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
110,911 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3201038f8f8c6f599473bf43fae8
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
14,145 head

Hopkins County · 2022

How calculated

Hopkins County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
48223:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
14,145 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c1b9d96009705719abc70ef66995
Official record
Open source ↗
SheepHISTORICAL
813 head

Hopkins County · 2022

How calculated

Hopkins County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
48223:sheep:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
813 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e95bfc733d7efa9025edf315cffa
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation49.3 in
How calculated

COOPER DAM, TX US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0ea7a9d39ea7cca27b80f64d49c0
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature64.6 °F
How calculated

COOPER DAM, TX US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e1a9df218f6baf72a2108f2c1422
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance4 miles
How calculated

COOPER DAM, TX US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Tira reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:439d3cdd073b8fc6440872c23c21
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Tira · 2026

How calculated

Tira · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:fc405e0b9791d6ff83bd20796915
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0.6 percent

Tira · 2026

How calculated

Tira · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:be21ad8b156165ea0a4eb21129b6
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Tira · 2026

How calculated

Tira · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:470a62795328d6e65f3e3b9259c1
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D1 category

Tira · 2026

How calculated

Tira · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7add176d5316acd77a79547b9306
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
40.1 0-100

Tira · 2026

How calculated

Tira · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:91a37e1c9fb11626b2bafc323635
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Tira · 2026

How calculated

Tira · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:43f603df548a1fdccfb4082d0cfe
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
28 weeks

Tira · 2026

How calculated

Tira · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b4ba91a73a19369cfcb121a3828e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
40.3 0-100

Tira · 2026

How calculated

Tira · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4e27e087a9e336ff967c38045a3d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
73 0-100

Tira · 2026

How calculated

Tira · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1ee640456bf23a72e7d41948050b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
19.3 0-100

Tira · 2026

How calculated

Tira · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2336afe2213fb3f7aac185daf5ac
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
59.6 percent

Tira · 2026

How calculated

Tira · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c7b66b089f348a753919cfc85789
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
37.2 percent

Tira · 2026

How calculated

Tira · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a486811d203c5441612bd4071e3c
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

48.2sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Alfalfa Hay in Albany, Oklahoma51.9 mi1,144 ac97.42. Alfalfa Hay in Dodd City, Texas35.5 mi1,105 ac95.73. Alfalfa Hay in Windom, Texas31.2 mi1,060 ac92.94. Alfalfa Hay in Utica, Oklahoma56.1 mi1,066 ac925. Alfalfa Hay in Bennington, Oklahoma54.9 mi1,062 ac91.86. Alfalfa Hay in Honey Grove, Texas28 mi1,000 ac89.27. Alfalfa Hay in Ravenna, Texas47 mi870 ac79.68. Alfalfa Hay in Kemp, Oklahoma56.1 mi866 ac78.99. Alfalfa Hay in Bonham, Texas41.7 mi842 ac78.110. Alfalfa Hay in Ector, Texas45.9 mi845 ac78.1
Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Tira?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Alfalfa Hay markets in Hopkins Countycounty
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 49 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.