Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Provo, South Dakota

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Provo.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Local mapped footprint6,014.2 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth42 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence88.1 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty64.1 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal16.1 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Provo. The latest 2025 raster shows 6,014 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 1st percentile among 485 analyzed South Dakota localities and the 64th percentile nationally. Fall River County reports 35,811 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Morrill, Nebraska, 85 miles away with 90,634 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 100% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureHIGH
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 1st percentile among analyzed South Dakota localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT

Footprint history

88.1 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 2,141 acres · 1st regional percentile · 51st national percentile2009: 2,617 acres · 1st regional percentile · 55th national percentile2010: 5,501 acres · 5th regional percentile · 62nd national percentile2011: 4,003 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 54th national percentile2012: 3,628 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 59th national percentile2013: 3,247 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 58th national percentile2014: 4,621 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 59th national percentile2015: 3,868 acres · 1st regional percentile · 56th national percentile2016: 4,355 acres · 1st regional percentile · 57th national percentile2017: 3,061 acres · 1st regional percentile · 54th national percentile2018: 5,467 acres · 1st regional percentile · 60th national percentile2019: 4,809 acres · 1st regional percentile · 58th national percentile2020: 4,449 acres · 1st regional percentile · 57th national percentile2021: 6,351 acres · 1st regional percentile · 63rd national percentile2022: 7,102 acres · 1st regional percentile · 65th national percentile2023: 7,489 acres · 1st regional percentile · 66th national percentile2024: 2,398 acres · 1st regional percentile · 61st national percentile2025: 6,014 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 64th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

42production depth
Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL
35,811 acres

Fall River County · 2022

How calculated

Fall River County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46047:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
35,811 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0be80e1cb7c420eebb69ee94ac4d
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL
146 farms

Fall River County · 2022

How calculated

Fall River County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46047:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
146 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5a1f899997140906ea6ad073ab25
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
5,493 acres

Fall River County · 2022

How calculated

Fall River County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46047:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
5,493 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:fa3eb5210cbf393c5cd07e6be365
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
52 farms

Fall River County · 2022

How calculated

Fall River County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46047:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
52 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:07875c73940889d59132ddf8a0fe
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
15.3 percent

Fall River County · 2022

How calculated

Fall River County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46047:alfalfa:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:763554c638a0f6e678c2994cc954
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL
42,789 tons

Fall River County · 2022

How calculated

Fall River County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46047:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
42,789 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2e8283c5b2d7cee4dcd62c4d16eb
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL
1.2 tons/acre

Fall River County · 2022

How calculated

Fall River County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46047:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:55ccfe40f209eb23b0782ed3f854
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
54,827 head

Fall River County · 2022

How calculated

Fall River County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46047:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
54,827 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ea39213f45dfaa18139d1eda1c07
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
76,659 head

Fall River County · 2022

How calculated

Fall River County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46047:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
76,659 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:fe3eefcd7fe5aeec8de9b2dfa107
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
3 head

Fall River County · 2022

How calculated

Fall River County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46047:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a609a6bfc238eb7993c09dbfbbe4
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
1,722 head

Fall River County · 2022

How calculated

Fall River County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46047:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,722 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7872f8f520bc9ce66db5a413dd63
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.6 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Fall River County · 2022

How calculated

Fall River County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46047:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9ab1c52d6f5122fa1b8a665ea63c
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation16.1 in
How calculated

EDGEMONT, SD US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:09d9b40fabfb920eeb82b8d44cd8
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature44.4 °F
How calculated

EDGEMONT, SD US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6d91add7eceed5a6369def992e5e
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance8.3 miles
How calculated

EDGEMONT, SD US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Provo reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:dad9786ce63fac667c0e9fefb737
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Provo · 2026

How calculated

Provo · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e57de9e65b9df4fc664e6a312320
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Provo · 2026

How calculated

Provo · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1102d0b9da3e0693645dfaff1bfc
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
85.1 percent

Provo · 2026

How calculated

Provo · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:56e29869d6ed90eeedabfd43cffc
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D3 category

Provo · 2026

How calculated

Provo · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:775f21a6542d65fd69033c08a629
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
77 0-100

Provo · 2026

How calculated

Provo · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:aa7aca84bc5c29e29c1e9c602962
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Provo · 2026

How calculated

Provo · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ccf94411d657680eed03e62dbc1e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
32 weeks

Provo · 2026

How calculated

Provo · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d583c91850ae6a5efd3a4c56b3ed
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
78.9 0-100

Provo · 2026

How calculated

Provo · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c6a1139608ab2937b05b46cac8ee
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
56.9 0-100

Provo · 2026

How calculated

Provo · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9c5cabf7aacf4dae07fb35ef6956
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
80 0-100

Provo · 2026

How calculated

Provo · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:23494af4a19bead9fd809e1652cf
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
63 percent

Provo · 2026

How calculated

Provo · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e9b7066e391ca4c0fbcf7b711d7f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
51.9 percent

Provo · 2026

How calculated

Provo · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:58919a3c3460f9d491790e3fdeba
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

64.1sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Provo?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 73 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.