HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Agar, South Dakota

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Agar.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Local mapped footprint5,657.9 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth40.1 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence82 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty62 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal21.1 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Agar
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Agar. The latest 2025 raster shows 5,658 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 1st percentile among 485 analyzed South Dakota localities and the 63rd percentile nationally. Sully County reports 3,833 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Wolsey, South Dakota, 84 miles away with 35,499 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 45.1% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 1st percentile among analyzed South Dakota localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT
Within 25 miles5,658mapped acres · 0.45% of radius · 2025

1th percentile among 485 analyzed South Dakota localities · 63th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Agar · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
25441
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
25441 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5d93e47041a34fad8709d533aae4
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

82 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 4,728 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 60th national percentile2009: 4,468 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 61st national percentile2010: 4,424 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 60th national percentile2011: 4,072 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 54th national percentile2012: 3,110 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 57th national percentile2013: 3,039 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 57th national percentile2014: 4,099 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 58th national percentile2015: 4,091 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 57th national percentile2016: 6,338 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 61st national percentile2017: 7,339 acres · 4th regional percentile · 64th national percentile2018: 9,044 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 66th national percentile2019: 11,593 acres · 4th regional percentile · 69th national percentile2020: 13,094 acres · 5th regional percentile · 70th national percentile2021: 11,881 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 70th national percentile2022: 12,012 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 71st national percentile2023: 11,412 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 71st national percentile2024: 3,052 acres · 1st regional percentile · 64th national percentile2025: 5,658 acres · 1st regional percentile · 63rd national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

40.1production depth
Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL
3,833 acres

Sully County · 2022

How calculated

Sully County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46119:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3,833 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:fb40c4c5fd0298028ac60e359a51
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL
42 farms

Sully County · 2022

How calculated

Sully County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46119:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
42 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e792ab386566097f3fe1383376c7
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
202 acres

Sully County · 2022

How calculated

Sully County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46119:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
202 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:71cde49376fdc6f8e0b402c3f151
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
3 farms

Sully County · 2022

How calculated

Sully County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46119:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a6fb04d4bd797be274c314a9a127
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
5.3 percent

Sully County · 2022

How calculated

Sully County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46119:alfalfa:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:539ad7575f2bd8bac78b6a322c42
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL
9,258 tons

Sully County · 2022

How calculated

Sully County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46119:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
9,258 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:dbcc73e137be180243cee321dd56
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL
2.4 tons/acre

Sully County · 2022

How calculated

Sully County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46119:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ed6f1d85e4fae051c02f176fca6f
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Sully County · 2022

How calculated

Sully County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46119:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:82013ee95e20bc52759cca70583c
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
33,608 head

Sully County · 2022

How calculated

Sully County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46119:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
33,608 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a5a04937d34a96051a85f99047af
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Sully County · 2022

How calculated

Sully County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46119:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a62f039524cfa80c3cd363834f1b
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
764 head

Sully County · 2022

How calculated

Sully County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46119:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
764 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:04fb856c96fb38997d6ed0ee4935
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.3 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Sully County · 2022

How calculated

Sully County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46119:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:05a321ee7615f616ce4ab8261010
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation21.1 in
How calculated

ONIDA 4 NW, SD US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7014df7e607e9f68b0a1759f8f08
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature46 °F
How calculated

ONIDA 4 NW, SD US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8c2519c90a1a3eaa80cbb679ff7c
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance8.2 miles
How calculated

ONIDA 4 NW, SD US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Agar reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ddba8d16c50f9e24b8034f9afcca
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
90.7 percent

Agar · 2026

How calculated

Agar · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2044ec9d11ce7215da0c94f0dbe8
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
45.1 percent

Agar · 2026

How calculated

Agar · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1d0d239fc737e38bc269d8cbfd4e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
12.6 percent

Agar · 2026

How calculated

Agar · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:712493305bc6192404d0d61fceee
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D1 category

Agar · 2026

How calculated

Agar · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:99629a34991df6d2e6eab1077c5e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
49.7 0-100

Agar · 2026

How calculated

Agar · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:78f15e81b4ffc23eddafaa7eed22
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Agar · 2026

How calculated

Agar · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ed635840fd5864960ce76c13229a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
8 weeks

Agar · 2026

How calculated

Agar · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:164825320e5fc7c17c910b791572
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
20 0-100

Agar · 2026

How calculated

Agar · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1f2d1284f7b7965fe8d8de9de795
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
5.9 0-100

Agar · 2026

How calculated

Agar · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:660bfe82a8d27bea720823ca24a2
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
47.5 0-100

Agar · 2026

How calculated

Agar · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f6b6ef79b847bbd8dd4de39f5ea4
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
13.6 percent

Agar · 2026

How calculated

Agar · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7a15c68879e88a4134d3a1add282
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
5.6 percent

Agar · 2026

How calculated

Agar · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:44695be76a9069109091db62e9df
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

62sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Alfalfa Hay in Wolsey, South Dakota84.1 mi35,499 ac95.82. Alfalfa Hay in Timber Lake, South Dakota63.5 mi33,113 ac91.83. Alfalfa Hay in Eureka, South Dakota68 mi32,194 ac89.64. Alfalfa Hay in Leola, South Dakota82.2 mi32,186 ac88.95. Alfalfa Hay in Long Lake, South Dakota81.9 mi31,809 ac88.16. Alfalfa Hay in Zeeland, North Dakota79.2 mi31,127 ac86.87. Alfalfa Hay in Whitehorse, South Dakota50.3 mi30,377 ac86.78. Alfalfa Hay in Wessington, South Dakota72.7 mi30,907 ac86.79. Alfalfa Hay in Artas, South Dakota73.5 mi30,902 ac86.610. Alfalfa Hay in Spring Valley Colony, South Dakota80.7 mi30,900 ac86.2
Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Agar?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Alfalfa Hay markets in Sully Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Agar

Barley Hay in Agar, South DakotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Agar, South DakotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Agar, South DakotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Agar, South DakotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Agar, South DakotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityGrass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Agar, South DakotaContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 72 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.