HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Lamar, South Carolina

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Lamar.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Local mapped footprint2.2 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth55 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence36.1 / 100LOW
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty53.7 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal46.6 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Lamar
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Lamar. The latest 2025 raster shows 2 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 53rd percentile among 475 analyzed South Carolina localities and the 18th percentile nationally. Darlington County reports 56 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Pageland, South Carolina, 45 miles away with 325 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 57.1% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 53rd percentile among analyzed South Carolina localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT
Within 25 miles2mapped acres · 0% of radius · 2025

53th percentile among 475 analyzed South Carolina localities · 18th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Lamar · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
10
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
10 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ae1632e23444b7c12e5eb40dbbf4
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

36.1 / 100 persistence · LOW

2008: 5 acres · 49th regional percentile · 17th national percentile2009: 7 acres · 66th regional percentile · 17th national percentile2010: 0 acres · 36th regional percentile · 13th national percentile2011: 0 acres · 43rd regional percentile · 12th national percentile2012: 0 acres · 42nd regional percentile · 11th national percentile2013: 0 acres · 41st regional percentile · 12th national percentile2014: 0 acres · 33rd regional percentile · 11th national percentile2015: 0 acres · 41st regional percentile · 11th national percentile2016: 0 acres · 52nd regional percentile · 13th national percentile2017: 0 acres · 28th regional percentile · 13th national percentile2018: 0 acres · 48th regional percentile · 11th national percentile2019: 0 acres · 37th regional percentile · 8th national percentile2020: 0 acres · 36th regional percentile · 7th national percentile2021: 0 acres · 34th regional percentile · 9th national percentile2022: 0 acres · 29th regional percentile · 9th national percentile2023: 0 acres · 23rd regional percentile · 8th national percentile2024: 21 acres · 74th regional percentile · 23rd national percentile2025: 2 acres · 55th regional percentile · 18th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

55production depth
Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL
56 acres

Darlington County · 2022

How calculated

Darlington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45031:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
56 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f08c8bf30d5814e23e6b8bc65d31
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL
9 farms

Darlington County · 2022

How calculated

Darlington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45031:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
9 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:64a2680fd312f1c1cb7551b2b96a
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
- acres

Darlington County · 2022

How calculated

Darlington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45031:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e386cb6a6fd3d06af11d19c24123
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
- farms

Darlington County · 2022

How calculated

Darlington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45031:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:fa4a3c4adbb83aa94f33ee5a662e
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL
75 tons

Darlington County · 2022

How calculated

Darlington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45031:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
75 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b4a74ba3790b1cdfafd4c44e03a5
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL
1.3 tons/acre

Darlington County · 2022

How calculated

Darlington County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45031:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b146ba8423aa86c7876d53a5ac72
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
1,652 head

Darlington County · 2022

How calculated

Darlington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45031:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,652 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:740d43ec29d1e2c9c8c9d5bb6d87
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
2,858 head

Darlington County · 2022

How calculated

Darlington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45031:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2,858 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:651c637dfc3ead0ff8d773d91962
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
6 head

Darlington County · 2022

How calculated

Darlington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45031:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
6 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e00003fc260a200c981498c80963
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
299 head

Darlington County · 2022

How calculated

Darlington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45031:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
299 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:818048d69fe3b7a819994bfb3c0e
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.8 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Darlington County · 2022

How calculated

Darlington County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45031:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ac91a923abdc55e148d1bf8b6754
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
429 head

Darlington County · 2022

How calculated

Darlington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45031:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
429 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bb805e5c21a40b754c482cd9b36a
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation46.7 in
How calculated

BISHOPVILLE 1ENE, SC US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b5f9401133c3285f62177132b550
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature62.6 °F
How calculated

BISHOPVILLE 1ENE, SC US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9eed3dd89635665ada35ca7e4c62
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance9.9 miles
How calculated

BISHOPVILLE 1ENE, SC US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Lamar reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ada7f194869e31cf89aaec7ad6ae
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Lamar · 2026

How calculated

Lamar · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6a4a84f5e0745a0ff8472583d629
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
57.1 percent

Lamar · 2026

How calculated

Lamar · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e737f69964d4b02a510ab1425e20
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Lamar · 2026

How calculated

Lamar · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:bc83191d138662a84dec4293fe11
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D2 category

Lamar · 2026

How calculated

Lamar · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:95cf355b41a8891d0c3a0b1f5fd8
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
51.4 0-100

Lamar · 2026

How calculated

Lamar · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7c2889275916351167736f9b535a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Lamar · 2026

How calculated

Lamar · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:cf52a79014c4951634aaa2f57434
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
34 weeks

Lamar · 2026

How calculated

Lamar · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:40446a4732ea77bdf27e9afa6f4b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
60 0-100

Lamar · 2026

How calculated

Lamar · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:285bc05af74d00f2a65f455d5e8a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
44.5 0-100

Lamar · 2026

How calculated

Lamar · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ef4179afea5739110277b88c69fb
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
51.4 0-100

Lamar · 2026

How calculated

Lamar · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c88f93f3c33acf2637927edd94e6
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
71 percent

Lamar · 2026

How calculated

Lamar · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:977316a73732caabdacd2623b7af
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
45.1 percent

Lamar · 2026

How calculated

Lamar · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4750c1a7a536c53ab510052f3608
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

53.7sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Alfalfa Hay in Pageland, South Carolina45.3 mi325 ac97.72. Alfalfa Hay in Mount Croghan, South Carolina42.5 mi307 ac93.83. Alfalfa Hay in Ruby, South Carolina40.5 mi251 ac814. Alfalfa Hay in Jefferson, South Carolina37.9 mi248 ac80.55. Alfalfa Hay in Heath Springs, South Carolina45.4 mi182 ac64.96. Alfalfa Hay in Kershaw, South Carolina39.4 mi163 ac60.77. Alfalfa Hay in Abney Crossroads, South Carolina34.5 mi126 ac52.58. Alfalfa Hay in Morven, North Carolina48.2 mi106 ac479. Alfalfa Hay in Chesterfield, South Carolina38.9 mi76 ac40.610. Alfalfa Hay in McFarlan, North Carolina44.9 mi69 ac38.7
Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Lamar?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Alfalfa Hay markets in Darlington Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Lamar

Barley Hay in Lamar, South CarolinaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Lamar, South CarolinaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Lamar, South CarolinaContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Lamar, South CarolinaContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Lamar, South CarolinaContextual local forage evidence in this localityGrass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Lamar, South CarolinaContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 72 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.