Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Blacksburg, South Carolina

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Blacksburg.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Local mapped footprint107.9 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth90.8 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence78.5 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty35.9 / 100LOW

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal45.3 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Blacksburg. The latest 2025 raster shows 108 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 95th percentile among 475 analyzed South Carolina localities and the 28th percentile nationally. Cherokee County reports 7,472 acres of reported hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Fort Mill, South Carolina, 34 miles away with 214 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 56.6% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 95th percentile among analyzed South Carolina localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT

Footprint history

78.5 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 44 acres · 85th regional percentile · 24th national percentile2009: 78 acres · 85th regional percentile · 27th national percentile2010: 142 acres · 87th regional percentile · 31st national percentile2011: 101 acres · 100th regional percentile · 30th national percentile2012: 80 acres · 98th regional percentile · 29th national percentile2013: 117 acres · 100th regional percentile · 30th national percentile2014: 49 acres · 94th regional percentile · 24th national percentile2015: 13 acres · 81st regional percentile · 20th national percentile2016: 52 acres · 97th regional percentile · 25th national percentile2017: 6 acres · 55th regional percentile · 18th national percentile2018: 155 acres · 99th regional percentile · 30th national percentile2019: 134 acres · 99th regional percentile · 28th national percentile2020: 147 acres · 99th regional percentile · 28th national percentile2021: 74 acres · 100th regional percentile · 25th national percentile2022: 30 acres · 96th regional percentile · 20th national percentile2023: 34 acres · 98th regional percentile · 21st national percentile2024: 24 acres · 76th regional percentile · 23rd national percentile2025: 108 acres · 95th regional percentile · 28th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

90.8production depth
Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL
(D) acres

Cherokee County · 2022

How calculated

Cherokee County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45021:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:aad807c85f8922fdd1846e30c6a1
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL
2 farms

Cherokee County · 2022

How calculated

Cherokee County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45021:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:482f4f0bcd9399cae5983050c05e
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
- acres

Cherokee County · 2022

How calculated

Cherokee County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45021:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f67538e1ab5d905c152d3d9be962
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
- farms

Cherokee County · 2022

How calculated

Cherokee County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45021:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:88fcd72d4d9d225f1dd017f362dd
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL
(D) tons

Cherokee County · 2022

How calculated

Cherokee County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45021:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:665f001e75f32aeb003a892f5201
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
4,304 head

Cherokee County · 2022

How calculated

Cherokee County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45021:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
4,304 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e20d2694d84fc8f943720a1514a1
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
7,210 head

Cherokee County · 2022

How calculated

Cherokee County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45021:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
7,210 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:261ad12272645bcbaccc4dd5c923
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
11 head

Cherokee County · 2022

How calculated

Cherokee County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45021:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
11 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d2b82a745cba3a5b2e4f8dd5b688
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
272 head

Cherokee County · 2022

How calculated

Cherokee County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45021:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
272 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:22ea228974e69c9a4d61c3d48011
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.9 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Cherokee County · 2022

How calculated

Cherokee County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45021:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5d078d47c5c4baa4d2ed3c98a9dd
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
608 head

Cherokee County · 2022

How calculated

Cherokee County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45021:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
608 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f3124bbdbf1c1d5a5a0a433c5af2
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
7,472 acres

Cherokee County · 2022

How calculated

Cherokee County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45021:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
7,472 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2785aada778bcac829515859466e
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation45.3 in
How calculated

NINETY NINE IS, SC US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:aacfc4f659302b62a14e85da4201
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature57.9 °F
How calculated

NINETY NINE IS, SC US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:eeec5dc257ace5d12d3e0a76bdb5
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance6.4 miles
How calculated

NINETY NINE IS, SC US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Blacksburg reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:746f41b0337e1ea7983040a3c6f3
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
56.6 percent

Blacksburg · 2026

How calculated

Blacksburg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:76ee7d798c1628afc3af9d3fe711
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Blacksburg · 2026

How calculated

Blacksburg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6bf05322b89a58a1f06b1760caf4
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Blacksburg · 2026

How calculated

Blacksburg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f9b1e7eb8a77e6a5635166a87807
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D1 category

Blacksburg · 2026

How calculated

Blacksburg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6ebb25ef9512dc32ec93a70d625a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
31.3 0-100

Blacksburg · 2026

How calculated

Blacksburg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7703e83333b88f9bfdb5607311e3
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
IMPROVING category

Blacksburg · 2026

How calculated

Blacksburg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0c7583d9311c00e451335dcbd10f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
38 weeks

Blacksburg · 2026

How calculated

Blacksburg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9fc90481d57421f9b9f06e0c348f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
59.9 0-100

Blacksburg · 2026

How calculated

Blacksburg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8beb91d1523440e2069d850982a4
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
67.7 0-100

Blacksburg · 2026

How calculated

Blacksburg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:791edbf5c7fc24e5d65b3a6e52ed
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
40 0-100

Blacksburg · 2026

How calculated

Blacksburg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e8a2265f006746591792ef279a87
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
70.3 percent

Blacksburg · 2026

How calculated

Blacksburg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c0e32f9aa5667d7c666007d60f33
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
51 percent

Blacksburg · 2026

How calculated

Blacksburg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5450f58cf4d5d267005ec5826c38
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

35.9sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Blacksburg?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 68 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.