Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Roseburg, Oregon

Name: Alfalfa market intelligence for Roseburg, Oregon
Creator: HayQuotes
License: https://hayquotes.com/terms

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Roseburg.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Roseburg

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT

Local mapped footprint127.9 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth55.3 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence75.6 / 100HIGH

Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS

Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS

Sourcing difficulty57.9 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal33.7 in1991–2020 NORMAL

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Roseburg

Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Roseburg. The latest 2025 raster shows 128 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 32nd percentile among 426 analyzed Oregon localities and the 29th percentile nationally. Douglas County reports 888 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Fort Klamath, Oregon, 77 miles away with 961 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 92% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED

Local supplyMODERATE

Nearby sourcingSTRONG

Drought pressureMODERATE

MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 32nd percentile among analyzed Oregon localities.

Trace this statement

usda-cdl-2025-30m

Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT

5 mi

9 ac

10 mi

24 ac

25 mi

128 ac

50 mi

202 ac

100 mi

1,686 ac

150 mi

166,173 ac

250 mi

339,179 ac

Within 25 miles128mapped acres · 0.01% of radius · 2025

32th percentile among 426 analyzed Oregon localities · 29th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Roseburg · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source: usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot: usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record: 575
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2025-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 575 classified pixels
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:80a8435474425b463217a263c13b
Official record: Open source ↗

Footprint history

75.6 / 100 persistence · HIGH

20082025

Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

55.3production depth

Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL

888 acres

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 41019:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 888 acres
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:df74efd92455e4ec283f5b7e97cc
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL

22 farms

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 41019:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 22 farms
Normalized unit: farms
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:21223b88579bb33999604bbdd00a
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL

289 acres

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 41019:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 289 acres
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:dc6b3868284c885fa5f470bd5019
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL

8 farms

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 41019:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 8 farms
Normalized unit: farms
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:73402278313dd01e97514f91612b
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL

32.5 percent

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 41019:alfalfa:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:0e811a93ff72a4a5a307a311065c
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL

1,285 tons

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 41019:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 1,285 tons
Normalized unit: tons
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:4cb85ce8ae757b31c744f346478b
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL

1.4 tons/acre

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 41019:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: tons/acre
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:27c4d5c668613e942b147336f147
Official record: Open source ↗

Beef CattleHISTORICAL

20,171 head

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 41019:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 20,171 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:cb8fbf89401a697df49575a45486
Official record: Open source ↗

CattleHISTORICAL

40,215 head

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 41019:cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 40,215 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:c0924a10a3ec639550c7fa94f368
Official record: Open source ↗

Dairy CattleHISTORICAL

221 head

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 41019:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 221 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:898e2ff7a8b613e06df293ff7763
Official record: Open source ↗

EquineHISTORICAL

1,911 head

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 41019:equine:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 1,911 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:bd8799268a8136003b08a24b8b11
Official record: Open source ↗

Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL

0.4 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 41019:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:9c70a01e0b2c24082254e04c78ac
Official record: Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation33.7 in

How calculated

ROSEBURG KQEN, OR US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: in
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:b50d0805af5ae19dbcaa7eee4348
Official record: Open source ↗

Annual mean temperature56.4 °F

How calculated

ROSEBURG KQEN, OR US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: °F
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:b3a605f6391eec1d8766ee672835
Official record: Open source ↗

Station distance1 miles

How calculated

ROSEBURG KQEN, OR US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Roseburg reference point to the official station.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: miles
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:05816b2a56de0b0676c18d8224ab
Official record: Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST

100 percent

Roseburg · 2026

How calculated

Roseburg · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:82177397ea6588d4
Source record: drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:dc0e1cfd6cdca7d73d9c3fca0e35
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST

92 percent

Roseburg · 2026

How calculated

Roseburg · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:82177397ea6588d4
Source record: drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:5333e80ef74a14cea816ef1718e6
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST

47.5 percent

Roseburg · 2026

How calculated

Roseburg · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:82177397ea6588d4
Source record: drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:0b9d74a2dba2fc5dab3e25c42699
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST

D2 category

Roseburg · 2026

How calculated

Roseburg · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:82177397ea6588d4
Source record: drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: category
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:325bb8c3a3717934ef834b7aba53
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST

67.9 0-100

Roseburg · 2026

How calculated

Roseburg · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:82177397ea6588d4
Source record: drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:094a0625a3744e89b22edf727447
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Four Week TrendLATEST

STABLE category

Roseburg · 2026

How calculated

Roseburg · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:82177397ea6588d4
Source record: drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: category
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:fe2d70809e887c8556ad73decd51
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST

33 weeks

Roseburg · 2026

How calculated

Roseburg · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:82177397ea6588d4
Source record: drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: weeks
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:7f30c94c7ea1e54a426d9f07f379
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST

65.4 0-100

Roseburg · 2026

How calculated

Roseburg · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:82177397ea6588d4
Source record: drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-06-09
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:cd5f8b205a079f2451ffe42c13df
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST

34.3 0-100

Roseburg · 2026

How calculated

Roseburg · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:82177397ea6588d4
Source record: drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-03-03
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:265e9bb4c6f3c01352707122b6f2
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST

66.1 0-100

Roseburg · 2026

How calculated

Roseburg · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:82177397ea6588d4
Source record: drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-08-04
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:d1d2afc63380455dc22832c771c8
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST

75.9 percent

Roseburg · 2026

How calculated

Roseburg · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:82177397ea6588d4
Source record: drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:a7358abb022e672903ae963de483
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST

37.9 percent

Roseburg · 2026

How calculated

Roseburg · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:82177397ea6588d4
Source record: drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:89b8bd8b4b212b2470f107194826
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.

Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Bale countWeight per bale (lb)

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Pickup price / baleLoaded route milesFreight / loaded mileUnloading totalStacking totalOther chargesPayload / load

Delivered total$0.00

Delivered equivalent—

Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Pickup price / baleLoaded route milesFreight / loaded mileUnloading totalStacking totalOther chargesPayload / load

Delivered total$0.00

Delivered equivalent—

Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.

Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

57.9sourcing difficulty

Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength

1. Alfalfa Hay in Fort Klamath, Oregon77.4 mi961 ac96.1 2. Alfalfa Hay in New Hope, Oregon59 mi353 ac49.6 3. Alfalfa Hay in Williams, Oregon69.4 mi355 ac49.2 4. Alfalfa Hay in Redwood, Oregon55.5 mi329 ac47.9 5. Alfalfa Hay in Selma, Oregon66.6 mi265 ac42.3 6. Alfalfa Hay in Beaver Marsh, Oregon78.2 mi270 ac42.2 7. Alfalfa Hay in Kerby, Oregon72.3 mi265 ac42.1 8. Alfalfa Hay in Cave Junction, Oregon74.6 mi264 ac41.9 9. Alfalfa Hay in Chemult, Oregon78.9 mi265 ac41.7 10. Alfalfa Hay in O'Brien, Oregon81 mi261 ac41.3

Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Roseburg?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Alfalfa Hay markets in Douglas Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Roseburg

Barley Hay in Roseburg, OregonContextual local forage evidence in this locality Bermudagrass Hay in Roseburg, OregonContextual local forage evidence in this locality Brome Hay in Roseburg, OregonContextual local forage evidence in this locality Clover Hay in Roseburg, OregonContextual local forage evidence in this locality Fescue Hay in Roseburg, OregonContextual local forage evidence in this locality Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Roseburg, OregonContextual local forage evidence in this locality

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station

1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗

National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics

rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter

202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level

2022countyOfficial source ↗

Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 73 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.

Alfalfa Hayin Roseburg, Oregon

What the local hay data shows

What the evidence says now

Local alfalfa footprint

Footprint history

Production & livestock context

Price intelligence

Local climate context

Drought & moisture context

Visible supply & verified demand

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

Quote A

Quote B

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Need Alfalfa Hay in Roseburg?

Continue through the evidence graph

County and agricultural-region markets

Other strongly supported hay types in Roseburg

Methodology & sources

Alfalfa Hay
in Roseburg, Oregon