HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Red Oak, Oklahoma

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Red Oak.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Local mapped footprint14.2 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth39.5 / 100LOW

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence57.8 / 100MODERATE
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty60 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal50.9 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Red Oak
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Red Oak. The latest 2025 raster shows 14 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 13th percentile among 846 analyzed Oklahoma localities and the 22nd percentile nationally. Latimer County reports 139 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Panama, Oklahoma, 28 miles away with 1,277 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 76.2% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyLIMITED
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 13th percentile among analyzed Oklahoma localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT
Within 25 miles14mapped acres · 0.001% of radius · 2025

13th percentile among 846 analyzed Oklahoma localities · 22th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Red Oak · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
64
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
64 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:bc71b8b716f1485bb6c29bfef3d3
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

57.8 / 100 persistence · MODERATE

2008: 3 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 16th national percentile2009: 0 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 10th national percentile2010: 14 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 22nd national percentile2011: 9 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 20th national percentile2012: 10 acres · 4th regional percentile · 20th national percentile2013: 12 acres · 4th regional percentile · 22nd national percentile2014: 29 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 22nd national percentile2015: 3 acres · 1st regional percentile · 16th national percentile2016: 10 acres · 7th regional percentile · 19th national percentile2017: 6 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 18th national percentile2018: 4 acres · 1st regional percentile · 15th national percentile2019: 61 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 23rd national percentile2020: 16 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 16th national percentile2021: 5 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 14th national percentile2022: 5 acres · 1st regional percentile · 13th national percentile2023: 7 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 16th national percentile2024: 0 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 12th national percentile2025: 14 acres · 13th regional percentile · 22nd national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

39.5production depth
Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL
139 acres

Latimer County · 2022

How calculated

Latimer County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40077:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
139 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:61e5a5ca302e74421bf67e8184bc
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL
7 farms

Latimer County · 2022

How calculated

Latimer County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40077:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
7 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ed3e32d4856c213b7d7a48ef6a46
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
- acres

Latimer County · 2022

How calculated

Latimer County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40077:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4c4687810c8bab4685cfb432bb3c
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
- farms

Latimer County · 2022

How calculated

Latimer County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40077:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:62f305c5635c596d5dd8160c55d3
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL
149 tons

Latimer County · 2022

How calculated

Latimer County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40077:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
149 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3103ebde1068c7f8385599dae549
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL
1.1 tons/acre

Latimer County · 2022

How calculated

Latimer County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40077:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0e10268d2b483819b4aae1cc6b0a
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Latimer County · 2022

How calculated

Latimer County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40077:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:04a3eac8ae32f44d029cbff9f897
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
38,124 head

Latimer County · 2022

How calculated

Latimer County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40077:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
38,124 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:775bfd06d76cc08160d10d4be5ba
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Latimer County · 2022

How calculated

Latimer County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40077:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7d87388b1203c059e17c95d6c897
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
659 head

Latimer County · 2022

How calculated

Latimer County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40077:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
659 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c1f36eddcca210edb8cda2380783
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.5 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Latimer County · 2022

How calculated

Latimer County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40077:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b713f883ab830d9075eb4563846d
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
1,306 head

Latimer County · 2022

How calculated

Latimer County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40077:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,306 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9a5ef753cb0be4703c58cfdd9ed3
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation50.9 in
How calculated

WILBURTON 9 ENE, OK US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:623faf5d83d1cd4c476462240057
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature61.8 °F
How calculated

WILBURTON 9 ENE, OK US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4ea1bdfaa0ca51fc0a597d65fb2a
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance5.2 miles
How calculated

WILBURTON 9 ENE, OK US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Red Oak reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a1128cbd628f58c5c12dd67b6e1c
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Red Oak · 2026

How calculated

Red Oak · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:acdd75df560e33dfbc1560b8a88a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
76.2 percent

Red Oak · 2026

How calculated

Red Oak · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9d33377a7f8bddd4192a3e84476a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Red Oak · 2026

How calculated

Red Oak · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d5b65d498f2340038ae79de30de3
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D2 category

Red Oak · 2026

How calculated

Red Oak · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9a516c2fcb6bc307916b44769dff
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
55.2 0-100

Red Oak · 2026

How calculated

Red Oak · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8c96784fe727d4406e36da4559b9
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Red Oak · 2026

How calculated

Red Oak · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1a99fb494268037c515aed398c31
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
9 weeks

Red Oak · 2026

How calculated

Red Oak · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ac3b79b1c42e9cb704e49a223087
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
20 0-100

Red Oak · 2026

How calculated

Red Oak · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ce70d932b672e93a9f3584551f9a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
40 0-100

Red Oak · 2026

How calculated

Red Oak · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:02d61b01be7e6b75e9e000fe2233
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
18.6 0-100

Red Oak · 2026

How calculated

Red Oak · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c45c7aaff3b07f835d121d233dc3
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
33.1 percent

Red Oak · 2026

How calculated

Red Oak · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2249fde01ba84d54be540150560d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
2 percent

Red Oak · 2026

How calculated

Red Oak · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:84ab28bdb0f65d4ba5ad74237f8c
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

60sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Alfalfa Hay in Panama, Oklahoma27.8 mi1,277 ac98.42. Alfalfa Hay in Spiro, Oklahoma32.6 mi1,280 ac98.43. Alfalfa Hay in Cameron, Oklahoma33.2 mi1,279 ac98.34. Alfalfa Hay in Fort Coffee, Oklahoma37.2 mi1,280 ac98.15. Alfalfa Hay in Gans, Oklahoma37.2 mi1,280 ac98.16. Alfalfa Hay in Rock Island, Oklahoma37.4 mi1,280 ac98.17. Alfalfa Hay in Hanson, Oklahoma39.9 mi1,280 ac988. Alfalfa Hay in Pocola, Oklahoma40.3 mi1,280 ac989. Alfalfa Hay in Hackett, Arkansas41.2 mi1,279 ac97.910. Alfalfa Hay in Muldrow, Oklahoma41.4 mi1,280 ac97.9
Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Red Oak?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Alfalfa Hay markets in Latimer Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Red Oak

Barley Hay in Red Oak, OklahomaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Red Oak, OklahomaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Red Oak, OklahomaContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Red Oak, OklahomaContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Red Oak, OklahomaContextual local forage evidence in this localityGrass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Red Oak, OklahomaContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 70 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.