HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Kinta, Oklahoma

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Kinta.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Local mapped footprint0.7 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth37.2 / 100LOW

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence65 / 100MODERATE
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty61.1 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal50.9 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Kinta
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Kinta. The latest 2025 raster shows 1 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 5th percentile among 846 analyzed Oklahoma localities and the 17th percentile nationally. Haskell County reports 1,044 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Panama, Oklahoma, 32 miles away with 1,277 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 97.2% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyLIMITED
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 5th percentile among analyzed Oklahoma localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT
Within 25 miles1mapped acres · 0% of radius · 2025

5th percentile among 846 analyzed Oklahoma localities · 17th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Kinta · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
3
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8d48aa2f936eb4bb30174ce8fe6d
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

65 / 100 persistence · MODERATE

2008: 37 acres · 7th regional percentile · 23rd national percentile2009: 10 acres · 10th regional percentile · 18th national percentile2010: 24 acres · 4th regional percentile · 24th national percentile2011: 7 acres · 1st regional percentile · 19th national percentile2012: 69 acres · 13th regional percentile · 28th national percentile2013: 19 acres · 6th regional percentile · 23rd national percentile2014: 140 acres · 13th regional percentile · 30th national percentile2015: 35 acres · 6th regional percentile · 24th national percentile2016: 24 acres · 9th regional percentile · 22nd national percentile2017: 24 acres · 4th regional percentile · 22nd national percentile2018: 19 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 20th national percentile2019: 102 acres · 7th regional percentile · 26th national percentile2020: 32 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 20th national percentile2021: 8 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 15th national percentile2022: 9 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 15th national percentile2023: 14 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 18th national percentile2024: 6 acres · 16th regional percentile · 17th national percentile2025: 1 acres · 5th regional percentile · 17th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

37.2production depth
Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL
1,044 acres

Haskell County · 2022

How calculated

Haskell County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40061:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,044 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:29ebf6cb8fd8321048b98afb42aa
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL
19 farms

Haskell County · 2022

How calculated

Haskell County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40061:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
19 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6348c3c241b235c58eb675700d65
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
(D) acres

Haskell County · 2022

How calculated

Haskell County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40061:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:80718246a622bda4444dc0b340ac
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
2 farms

Haskell County · 2022

How calculated

Haskell County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40061:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b2ad665d92d984d64271137ad824
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL
1,565 tons

Haskell County · 2022

How calculated

Haskell County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40061:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,565 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:40bd20f2724923819a5659d6a931
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL
1.5 tons/acre

Haskell County · 2022

How calculated

Haskell County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40061:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4947f54889d83287cfcf62ab837d
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
34,531 head

Haskell County · 2022

How calculated

Haskell County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40061:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
34,531 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1805151241fd0e287edd9578c433
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
62,314 head

Haskell County · 2022

How calculated

Haskell County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40061:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
62,314 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:cf5ef1d24243b29f912b02a56cdf
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
118 head

Haskell County · 2022

How calculated

Haskell County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40061:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
118 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ede56491225913a68ab113f48ae4
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
810 head

Haskell County · 2022

How calculated

Haskell County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40061:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
810 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2ed039728c56d92e814079693775
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.6 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Haskell County · 2022

How calculated

Haskell County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40061:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4b466943fc82b0043d635d12237a
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
875 head

Haskell County · 2022

How calculated

Haskell County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40061:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
875 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:67c3b57ff5fb969f7d07584c1d09
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation50.9 in
How calculated

WILBURTON 9 ENE, OK US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:51079c8b1c78c62a16b46e5fd0fc
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature61.8 °F
How calculated

WILBURTON 9 ENE, OK US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a959842cdc96baab04231e9155b7
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance11.6 miles
How calculated

WILBURTON 9 ENE, OK US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Kinta reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:66dca1357a0a890473fa4343c4f6
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Kinta · 2026

How calculated

Kinta · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:cb242c6241c9727b6657b31bca76
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
97.2 percent

Kinta · 2026

How calculated

Kinta · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f879dd6ef778f51ac997ba6a6bac
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Kinta · 2026

How calculated

Kinta · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f710c239b89087eae5993d204f77
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D2 category

Kinta · 2026

How calculated

Kinta · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ffc2564b690808b4f9869e13fede
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
59.4 0-100

Kinta · 2026

How calculated

Kinta · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a726bc9b73e76d8574a9130e2c78
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Kinta · 2026

How calculated

Kinta · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:be8678198844fed8c3a133a7cfda
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
16 weeks

Kinta · 2026

How calculated

Kinta · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d5c025667ba7b56de5e06f3614f9
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
20 0-100

Kinta · 2026

How calculated

Kinta · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:58a9eece9898a3cc11680de311e2
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
40 0-100

Kinta · 2026

How calculated

Kinta · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:37f3c39631cbddf0e3d51263ef48
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
20 0-100

Kinta · 2026

How calculated

Kinta · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5e38956e5795705e030afcf37bfc
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
43.4 percent

Kinta · 2026

How calculated

Kinta · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:66beb3af2545bb8b85ca78627a8a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
5.6 percent

Kinta · 2026

How calculated

Kinta · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0916b3a50fc0379b9fb9a113e9c7
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

61.1sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Alfalfa Hay in Panama, Oklahoma32.4 mi1,277 ac98.22. Alfalfa Hay in Spiro, Oklahoma35.7 mi1,280 ac98.23. Alfalfa Hay in Gans, Oklahoma35.9 mi1,280 ac98.24. Alfalfa Hay in Hanson, Oklahoma37.6 mi1,280 ac98.15. Alfalfa Hay in Cameron, Oklahoma39.5 mi1,279 ac986. Alfalfa Hay in Fort Coffee, Oklahoma39.5 mi1,280 ac987. Alfalfa Hay in Muldrow, Oklahoma41.1 mi1,280 ac97.98. Alfalfa Hay in Rock Island, Oklahoma42.9 mi1,280 ac97.89. Alfalfa Hay in Cowlington, Oklahoma28.8 mi1,261 ac97.410. Alfalfa Hay in Brent, Oklahoma30.4 mi1,261 ac97.4
Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Kinta?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Alfalfa Hay markets in Haskell Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Kinta

Barley Hay in Kinta, OklahomaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Kinta, OklahomaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Kinta, OklahomaContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Kinta, OklahomaContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Kinta, OklahomaContextual local forage evidence in this localityGrass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Kinta, OklahomaContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 71 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.