HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Cottonwood, Oklahoma

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Cottonwood.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Local mapped footprint46.9 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth49.6 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence75 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty56.3 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal45.6 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Cottonwood
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Cottonwood. The latest 2025 raster shows 47 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 22nd percentile among 846 analyzed Oklahoma localities and the 25th percentile nationally. Coal County reports 770 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Stratford, Oklahoma, 46 miles away with 6,262 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 100% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 22nd percentile among analyzed Oklahoma localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT
Within 25 miles47mapped acres · 0.004% of radius · 2025

22th percentile among 846 analyzed Oklahoma localities · 25th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Cottonwood · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
211
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
211 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:eef182e3ac9fbe6c891bfbd8241a
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

75 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 133 acres · 35th regional percentile · 30th national percentile2009: 19 acres · 11th regional percentile · 21st national percentile2010: 60 acres · 16th regional percentile · 27th national percentile2011: 24 acres · 7th regional percentile · 23rd national percentile2012: 100 acres · 17th regional percentile · 30th national percentile2013: 186 acres · 26th regional percentile · 34th national percentile2014: 113 acres · 11th regional percentile · 28th national percentile2015: 37 acres · 6th regional percentile · 24th national percentile2016: 27 acres · 9th regional percentile · 22nd national percentile2017: 80 acres · 10th regional percentile · 26th national percentile2018: 61 acres · 10th regional percentile · 25th national percentile2019: 88 acres · 5th regional percentile · 26th national percentile2020: 44 acres · 5th regional percentile · 21st national percentile2021: 32 acres · 8th regional percentile · 20th national percentile2022: 38 acres · 9th regional percentile · 21st national percentile2023: 31 acres · 7th regional percentile · 21st national percentile2024: 11 acres · 24th regional percentile · 19th national percentile2025: 47 acres · 22nd regional percentile · 25th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

49.6production depth
Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL
770 acres

Coal County · 2022

How calculated

Coal County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40029:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
770 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3b8a07a037e121dc8da10ad7514c
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL
15 farms

Coal County · 2022

How calculated

Coal County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40029:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
15 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:16670cf38eb63c6963681fff58bd
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
(D) acres

Coal County · 2022

How calculated

Coal County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40029:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4c0330613478c8bb66af566f8758
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
1 farms

Coal County · 2022

How calculated

Coal County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40029:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6fa3e0a927e441db8d76000a1712
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL
800 tons

Coal County · 2022

How calculated

Coal County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40029:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
800 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:50f228bb898403c2652b3b72828e
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL
1 tons/acre

Coal County · 2022

How calculated

Coal County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40029:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:92ed0aa680322a9d3ceb06ef1f3c
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
17,108 head

Coal County · 2022

How calculated

Coal County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40029:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
17,108 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:dc2fa1231fb6356c836dc235d353
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
35,636 head

Coal County · 2022

How calculated

Coal County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40029:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
35,636 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a2b328ae768b604c0361593817a4
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
236 head

Coal County · 2022

How calculated

Coal County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40029:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
236 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:04be0a9fd7782db202b6fa57c41b
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
3,049 head

Coal County · 2022

How calculated

Coal County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40029:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3,049 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:31cccde217e88fe882a1989b7f34
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.7 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Coal County · 2022

How calculated

Coal County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40029:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d7946c39d43d9781cb28bc14c162
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
651 head

Coal County · 2022

How calculated

Coal County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40029:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
651 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d6cc98b8c9c9fd5755fc0e1da6f0
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation45.6 in
How calculated

CENTRAHOMA 2 ESE, OK US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e2ee03f2eba78eb8a42145cb832b
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature61.1 °F
How calculated

CENTRAHOMA 2 ESE, OK US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:485fff890bba87e0ab0881a7fac9
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance7 miles
How calculated

CENTRAHOMA 2 ESE, OK US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Cottonwood reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:84e6688a2ed751b57799fb2e2de6
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Cottonwood · 2026

How calculated

Cottonwood · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:46a641e6ad015c30f3b5b8c51d0d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Cottonwood · 2026

How calculated

Cottonwood · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:604108ffd2a0aa35dc252ccb00dd
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Cottonwood · 2026

How calculated

Cottonwood · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:dda58612923e57bcb9200a9fddcf
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D2 category

Cottonwood · 2026

How calculated

Cottonwood · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:df60c58c617a7b54b5192267b32d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
60 0-100

Cottonwood · 2026

How calculated

Cottonwood · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5f299da8a9a0f282aafe3e9b700d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Cottonwood · 2026

How calculated

Cottonwood · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a1c418e526f828127f0bfece392a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
27 weeks

Cottonwood · 2026

How calculated

Cottonwood · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9d00d326747dc05c2a93027d4bfc
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
29.1 0-100

Cottonwood · 2026

How calculated

Cottonwood · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:79e76b272237daffd28c061ee0f7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
54.6 0-100

Cottonwood · 2026

How calculated

Cottonwood · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:770c24991c0d89e1705df411a43b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
20 0-100

Cottonwood · 2026

How calculated

Cottonwood · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1f801ec25df8da3d0830d758c564
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
65.5 percent

Cottonwood · 2026

How calculated

Cottonwood · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:850fef0730564ff3d899f04a6d96
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
18.6 percent

Cottonwood · 2026

How calculated

Cottonwood · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5f4fbf867803558fb8dbf0fd3ccd
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

56.3sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Alfalfa Hay in Stratford, Oklahoma46.1 mi6,262 ac97.72. Alfalfa Hay in Sulphur, Oklahoma44.7 mi3,710 ac67.23. Alfalfa Hay in Vanoss, Oklahoma40.5 mi3,537 ac65.34. Alfalfa Hay in Roff, Oklahoma36.7 mi2,694 ac55.45. Alfalfa Hay in Hickory, Oklahoma37 mi2,671 ac55.16. Alfalfa Hay in Pickett, Oklahoma36 mi2,298 ac50.77. Alfalfa Hay in Fitzhugh, Oklahoma32.8 mi1,947 ac46.78. Alfalfa Hay in Albany, Oklahoma47.1 mi1,144 ac36.49. Alfalfa Hay in Bokchito, Oklahoma36.7 mi1,076 ac36.110. Alfalfa Hay in Bennington, Oklahoma39.1 mi1,062 ac35.8
Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Cottonwood?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Alfalfa Hay markets in Coal Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Cottonwood

Barley Hay in Cottonwood, OklahomaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Cottonwood, OklahomaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Cottonwood, OklahomaContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Cottonwood, OklahomaContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Cottonwood, OklahomaContextual local forage evidence in this localityGrass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Cottonwood, OklahomaContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 70 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.