Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Bristow, Oklahoma

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Bristow.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Local mapped footprint240.4 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth61 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence85.5 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty50.2 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal42.1 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Bristow. The latest 2025 raster shows 240 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 37th percentile among 846 analyzed Oklahoma localities and the 32nd percentile nationally. Creek County reports 1,202 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Luther, Oklahoma, 46 miles away with 3,824 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 48.8% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 37th percentile among analyzed Oklahoma localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT

Footprint history

85.5 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 219 acres · 41st regional percentile · 33rd national percentile2009: 151 acres · 39th regional percentile · 31st national percentile2010: 360 acres · 46th regional percentile · 36th national percentile2011: 140 acres · 23rd regional percentile · 31st national percentile2012: 446 acres · 41st regional percentile · 40th national percentile2013: 340 acres · 36th regional percentile · 38th national percentile2014: 488 acres · 32nd regional percentile · 38th national percentile2015: 181 acres · 26th regional percentile · 32nd national percentile2016: 269 acres · 30th regional percentile · 33rd national percentile2017: 396 acres · 32nd regional percentile · 36th national percentile2018: 357 acres · 31st regional percentile · 35th national percentile2019: 521 acres · 35th regional percentile · 36th national percentile2020: 367 acres · 41st regional percentile · 34th national percentile2021: 248 acres · 37th regional percentile · 33rd national percentile2022: 284 acres · 41st regional percentile · 34th national percentile2023: 262 acres · 40th regional percentile · 34th national percentile2024: 48 acres · 29th regional percentile · 27th national percentile2025: 240 acres · 37th regional percentile · 32nd national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

61production depth
Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL
1,202 acres

Creek County · 2022

How calculated

Creek County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40037:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,202 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:254ab3c5927f0aadb47c02e6ba42
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL
22 farms

Creek County · 2022

How calculated

Creek County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40037:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
22 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6c76cb1fae8c8ff16fe3a9d1b9c2
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
- acres

Creek County · 2022

How calculated

Creek County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40037:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2a146531a280f1464c27cf8965e5
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
- farms

Creek County · 2022

How calculated

Creek County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40037:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:55766304dcaab356246b4f3f6b49
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL
415 tons

Creek County · 2022

How calculated

Creek County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40037:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
415 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d8c88945cd1e64c81aa5a769509d
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL
0.3 tons/acre

Creek County · 2022

How calculated

Creek County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40037:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bb99a6f6159e7ecbbeecd04bca31
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
21,871 head

Creek County · 2022

How calculated

Creek County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40037:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
21,871 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:28348e8c3fa9120f633a53833d2a
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
41,318 head

Creek County · 2022

How calculated

Creek County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40037:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
41,318 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:35f46a0a3c91b6aedb988b27380d
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
10 head

Creek County · 2022

How calculated

Creek County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40037:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
10 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:52b55f1f4d53a47c577cafb108d5
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
2,300 head

Creek County · 2022

How calculated

Creek County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40037:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2,300 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d99d6e5dbd81c6f14c142134de47
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.8 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Creek County · 2022

How calculated

Creek County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40037:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bfad1ec07d1f74357fc4b416994b
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
1,638 head

Creek County · 2022

How calculated

Creek County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40037:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,638 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e1ae444200c6b1ab0f5e8ee6c8c0
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation42.1 in
How calculated

BRISTOW, OK US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:840890bb2836cdf497ab77aee9c7
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature59.5 °F
How calculated

BRISTOW, OK US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:064aa85eb35d903494e370a866af
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance0.3 miles
How calculated

BRISTOW, OK US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Bristow reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5f955ad73c7115c8211bc7f29146
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Bristow · 2026

How calculated

Bristow · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:95804ab85001b76940afd65e6c7d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
48.8 percent

Bristow · 2026

How calculated

Bristow · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:87b9fb22aaa2bedb372a9eaef524
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Bristow · 2026

How calculated

Bristow · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c4c6b9741bafc0c5b1068f4838c4
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D1 category

Bristow · 2026

How calculated

Bristow · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:94c202693004ecf399cae525ec9f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
49.8 0-100

Bristow · 2026

How calculated

Bristow · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:84af321de4f2cf568ffe88993a92
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Bristow · 2026

How calculated

Bristow · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1a8b267109719b0e3d6fd03db637
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
22 weeks

Bristow · 2026

How calculated

Bristow · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f4f2d619c3d3b7b90be071dc2fe3
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
21.5 0-100

Bristow · 2026

How calculated

Bristow · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8fa2563b6e270d1c8124afbb8add
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
40 0-100

Bristow · 2026

How calculated

Bristow · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:27783b011ccb7d6c798a0675590f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
14.9 0-100

Bristow · 2026

How calculated

Bristow · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:cb205b6c8f342dd971cae67270fe
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
53.5 percent

Bristow · 2026

How calculated

Bristow · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b9bbcdde1431a602bdfcbe434159
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
9.4 percent

Bristow · 2026

How calculated

Bristow · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d560b78adb90ad59af0b3eff9c5c
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

50.2sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Bristow?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 72 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.