Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Sugarcreek, Ohio

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Sugarcreek.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Local mapped footprint19,782.7 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth88.8 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence86.6 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty36.4 / 100LOW

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal42.1 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Sugarcreek. The latest 2025 raster shows 19,783 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 87th percentile among 1,265 analyzed Ohio localities and the 86th percentile nationally. Tuscarawas County reports 7,953 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as New Pittsburg, Ohio, 34 miles away with 37,067 mapped acres. HayQuotes has not yet stored enough recent marketplace observations here to publish supplier liquidity, so quote requests are the check for bale format, freight, timing, and availability.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 87th percentile among analyzed Ohio localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT

Footprint history

86.6 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 38,473 acres · 97th regional percentile · 91st national percentile2009: 37,322 acres · 96th regional percentile · 91st national percentile2010: 15,669 acres · 77th regional percentile · 78th national percentile2011: 22,315 acres · 88th regional percentile · 81st national percentile2012: 15,562 acres · 74th regional percentile · 78th national percentile2013: 18,639 acres · 86th regional percentile · 83rd national percentile2014: 23,715 acres · 89th regional percentile · 85th national percentile2015: 25,407 acres · 86th regional percentile · 83rd national percentile2016: 36,123 acres · 93rd regional percentile · 88th national percentile2017: 18,143 acres · 80th regional percentile · 78th national percentile2018: 16,895 acres · 67th regional percentile · 76th national percentile2019: 21,404 acres · 83rd regional percentile · 80th national percentile2020: 25,987 acres · 81st regional percentile · 82nd national percentile2021: 22,324 acres · 76th regional percentile · 81st national percentile2022: 19,405 acres · 76th regional percentile · 80th national percentile2023: 20,981 acres · 85th regional percentile · 82nd national percentile2024: 1,481 acres · 43rd regional percentile · 57th national percentile2025: 19,783 acres · 87th regional percentile · 86th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

88.8production depth
Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL
7,953 acres

Tuscarawas County · 2022

How calculated

Tuscarawas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
39157:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
7,953 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:42082a8efba20669acd94267e757
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL
271 farms

Tuscarawas County · 2022

How calculated

Tuscarawas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
39157:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
271 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6c8ba84f53c059bbbcd79dcf4ef1
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
(D) acres

Tuscarawas County · 2022

How calculated

Tuscarawas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
39157:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5b3242cad405f175e4cbeecdf0dc
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
1 farms

Tuscarawas County · 2022

How calculated

Tuscarawas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
39157:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9db8b24eaaf13120c0b0385d5324
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL
20,742 tons

Tuscarawas County · 2022

How calculated

Tuscarawas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
39157:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
20,742 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:cfb570c6de62dc5c2ba00822d135
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL
2.6 tons/acre

Tuscarawas County · 2022

How calculated

Tuscarawas County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
39157:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:05267dd72665a447ceb9d1fa4afb
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
6,535 head

Tuscarawas County · 2022

How calculated

Tuscarawas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
39157:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
6,535 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0136660272f3a2771ebba9287493
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
28,672 head

Tuscarawas County · 2022

How calculated

Tuscarawas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
39157:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
28,672 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:29b32ac11f1ba8c0439f7258269e
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
6,905 head

Tuscarawas County · 2022

How calculated

Tuscarawas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
39157:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
6,905 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:817bb9dfcc19c40f3aaa6386c997
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
2,346 head

Tuscarawas County · 2022

How calculated

Tuscarawas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
39157:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2,346 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:87675d4c841e9db4efad1f54f192
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.6 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Tuscarawas County · 2022

How calculated

Tuscarawas County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
39157:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ba13b81297bbb20ca4bd5ae76d3f
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
963 head

Tuscarawas County · 2022

How calculated

Tuscarawas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
39157:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
963 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:efc76fda54a2e92e39ec78e2a7a2
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation42.1 in
How calculated

NEW PHILADELPHIA, OH US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1452a0030e5fa74a71a1c23d8df0
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature50.8 °F
How calculated

NEW PHILADELPHIA, OH US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1cb5b86f659c8cf9a922646a2b1a
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance11 miles
How calculated

NEW PHILADELPHIA, OH US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Sugarcreek reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:fe10c685261a770cd8bfea3ee24e
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Sugarcreek · 2026

How calculated

Sugarcreek · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0a7372f16fed8fe2
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a11cc96bd052b7e85da1e5ea78f3
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Sugarcreek · 2026

How calculated

Sugarcreek · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0a7372f16fed8fe2
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6f6076385fe0f458fe0e4c4864b7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Sugarcreek · 2026

How calculated

Sugarcreek · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0a7372f16fed8fe2
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2dcf6aaae138fd8645bcc5a07517
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
NONE category

Sugarcreek · 2026

How calculated

Sugarcreek · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0a7372f16fed8fe2
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9905113db9f3438cddf099fa8552
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
0 0-100

Sugarcreek · 2026

How calculated

Sugarcreek · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0a7372f16fed8fe2
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5c3b8039ede19b149c05db44c826
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Sugarcreek · 2026

How calculated

Sugarcreek · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0a7372f16fed8fe2
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c52743590f9276e61d7e2e45156e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
6 weeks

Sugarcreek · 2026

How calculated

Sugarcreek · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0a7372f16fed8fe2
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ca745cfa0db21e941a7b403b1773
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Sugarcreek · 2026

How calculated

Sugarcreek · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0a7372f16fed8fe2
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:72994b7c24ea169b41a8745d75b7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
20 0-100

Sugarcreek · 2026

How calculated

Sugarcreek · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0a7372f16fed8fe2
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b7a0132787c75f0b15fb1444082a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Sugarcreek · 2026

How calculated

Sugarcreek · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0a7372f16fed8fe2
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:fbeab1aba8fc1bdcc386e343e8b1
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
11.3 percent

Sugarcreek · 2026

How calculated

Sugarcreek · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0a7372f16fed8fe2
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:08f40e75f3862581424bf402f0bd
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
2.2 percent

Sugarcreek · 2026

How calculated

Sugarcreek · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0a7372f16fed8fe2
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:95298d38b31f8ec19275ca4d738f
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

36.4sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Sugarcreek?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 71 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.