Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Bucyrus, North Dakota

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Bucyrus.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Local mapped footprint34,360.4 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth92.4 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence85.7 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty37.5 / 100LOW

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal14.3 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Bucyrus. The latest 2025 raster shows 34,360 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 94th percentile among 406 analyzed North Dakota localities and the 94th percentile nationally. Adams County reports 33,517 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as St. Onge, South Dakota, 114 miles away with 48,805 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 0.3% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

Bucyrus ranks among the strongest persistent mapped alfalfa footprints in North Dakota.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2008-30m
  • usda-cdl-2009-30m
  • usda-cdl-2010-30m
  • usda-cdl-2011-30m
  • usda-cdl-2012-30m
  • usda-cdl-2013-30m
  • usda-cdl-2014-30m
  • usda-cdl-2015-30m
  • usda-cdl-2016-30m
  • usda-cdl-2017-30m
  • usda-cdl-2018-30m
  • usda-cdl-2019-30m
  • usda-cdl-2020-30m
  • usda-cdl-2021-30m
  • usda-cdl-2022-30m
  • usda-cdl-2023-30m
  • usda-cdl-2024-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT

Footprint history

85.7 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 21,697 acres · 95th regional percentile · 84th national percentile2009: 17,796 acres · 86th regional percentile · 82nd national percentile2010: 18,781 acres · 91st regional percentile · 81st national percentile2011: 20,489 acres · 80th regional percentile · 80th national percentile2012: 14,661 acres · 82nd regional percentile · 77th national percentile2013: 15,288 acres · 79th regional percentile · 80th national percentile2014: 21,057 acres · 89th regional percentile · 83rd national percentile2015: 19,731 acres · 86th regional percentile · 79th national percentile2016: 19,114 acres · 84th regional percentile · 78th national percentile2017: 25,238 acres · 90th regional percentile · 84th national percentile2018: 30,868 acres · 93rd regional percentile · 86th national percentile2019: 33,544 acres · 94th regional percentile · 87th national percentile2020: 37,619 acres · 94th regional percentile · 88th national percentile2021: 44,092 acres · 97th regional percentile · 91st national percentile2022: 48,958 acres · 98th regional percentile · 93rd national percentile2023: 47,470 acres · 98th regional percentile · 93rd national percentile2024: 15,783 acres · 82nd regional percentile · 86th national percentile2025: 34,360 acres · 94th regional percentile · 94th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

92.4production depth
Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL
33,517 acres

Adams County · 2022

How calculated

Adams County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
38001:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
33,517 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bf1c3ebee1f022649b8c8a2edb2d
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL
156 farms

Adams County · 2022

How calculated

Adams County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
38001:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
156 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f0c6b104f3f51652071f1269c276
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
- acres

Adams County · 2022

How calculated

Adams County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
38001:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a6fe6821917baf4e7be5a3df4be1
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
- farms

Adams County · 2022

How calculated

Adams County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
38001:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:706723824816e48554f304c76723
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL
49,556 tons

Adams County · 2022

How calculated

Adams County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
38001:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
49,556 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3e2c9711809bb260282e713c5f97
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL
1.5 tons/acre

Adams County · 2022

How calculated

Adams County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
38001:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:fe8d4ca37368fa3763f47c3ec2f7
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Adams County · 2022

How calculated

Adams County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
38001:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0ba9e45032b50769986d69930301
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
32,584 head

Adams County · 2022

How calculated

Adams County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
38001:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
32,584 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:eda659baea390313b5b34b088b71
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Adams County · 2022

How calculated

Adams County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
38001:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7592d942bda96c20f42ca7c9990f
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
104 head

Adams County · 2022

How calculated

Adams County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
38001:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
104 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:df57c36f52e7774e15f56e42511c
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
1.6 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Adams County · 2022

How calculated

Adams County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
38001:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a9baeb88fa2dcc6bd7070e29a95c
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
159 head

Adams County · 2022

How calculated

Adams County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
38001:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
159 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7e4ba8a8779d33c1433c3c28b6f9
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation14.3 in
How calculated

HETTINGER MUNI AP, ND US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b1c2aa662e06687a3b8d871eb250
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature42.4 °F
How calculated

HETTINGER MUNI AP, ND US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d855698687c4ef9447feab70c7a6
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance7.3 miles
How calculated

HETTINGER MUNI AP, ND US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Bucyrus reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0adfc34db73bb54d1b0b2a722743
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Bucyrus · 2026

How calculated

Bucyrus · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ff680b6a91ac5678
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c12785bca1c0d9c11595b8f4c5f2
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0.3 percent

Bucyrus · 2026

How calculated

Bucyrus · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ff680b6a91ac5678
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:915bd032bff8e9b2e49dc0ce993d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Bucyrus · 2026

How calculated

Bucyrus · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ff680b6a91ac5678
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2ec80613bef85fe9ccbc6cf0d1fe
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D1 category

Bucyrus · 2026

How calculated

Bucyrus · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ff680b6a91ac5678
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:787af1b0b311f45977b6861dc0dd
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
40.1 0-100

Bucyrus · 2026

How calculated

Bucyrus · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ff680b6a91ac5678
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5861b625f570f1729efc23e2a16c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
IMPROVING category

Bucyrus · 2026

How calculated

Bucyrus · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ff680b6a91ac5678
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4b872fbab288a7dd89f8b9407618
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
7 weeks

Bucyrus · 2026

How calculated

Bucyrus · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ff680b6a91ac5678
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:13fbbd9f3cb302eacad2dd4d923c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Bucyrus · 2026

How calculated

Bucyrus · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ff680b6a91ac5678
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:26f536f4f0dd4b55c3758f9f52c0
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Bucyrus · 2026

How calculated

Bucyrus · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ff680b6a91ac5678
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:954eb55da5bec2d8e47752ffbd1b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
59.6 0-100

Bucyrus · 2026

How calculated

Bucyrus · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ff680b6a91ac5678
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1e17aeadec2621f4b7f9082e02a5
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
15.8 percent

Bucyrus · 2026

How calculated

Bucyrus · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ff680b6a91ac5678
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1af9e9bf7bd6dbcc9942fb97acb6
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
8.9 percent

Bucyrus · 2026

How calculated

Bucyrus · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ff680b6a91ac5678
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:cc2f34ed0ba2ade321f8a3a5e843
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

37.5sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Bucyrus?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 70 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.