Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Magnet, Nebraska

Name: Alfalfa market intelligence for Magnet, Nebraska
Creator: HayQuotes
License: https://hayquotes.com/terms

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Magnet.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Magnet

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT

Local mapped footprint42,118.9 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth95.5 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence95.9 / 100HIGH

Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS

Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS

Sourcing difficulty33.9 / 100LOW

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal27.5 in1991–2020 NORMAL

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Magnet

Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Magnet. The latest 2025 raster shows 42,119 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 94th percentile among 593 analyzed Nebraska localities and the 96th percentile nationally. Cedar County reports 16,159 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Tabor, South Dakota, 35 miles away with 56,784 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 80.1% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED

Local supplySTRONG

Nearby sourcingSTRONG

Drought pressureMODERATE

MarketplaceLIMITED

Magnet ranks among the strongest persistent mapped alfalfa footprints in Nebraska.

Trace this statement

usda-cdl-2025-30m
usda-cdl-2008-30m
usda-cdl-2009-30m
usda-cdl-2010-30m
usda-cdl-2011-30m
usda-cdl-2012-30m
usda-cdl-2013-30m
usda-cdl-2014-30m
usda-cdl-2015-30m
usda-cdl-2016-30m
usda-cdl-2017-30m
usda-cdl-2018-30m
usda-cdl-2019-30m
usda-cdl-2020-30m
usda-cdl-2021-30m
usda-cdl-2022-30m
usda-cdl-2023-30m
usda-cdl-2024-30m
usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement

usda-cdl-2025-30m

Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT

5 mi

1,125 ac

10 mi

6,683 ac

25 mi

42,119 ac

50 mi

149,567 ac

100 mi

445,630 ac

150 mi

844,694 ac

250 mi

1,846,229 ac

Within 25 miles42,119mapped acres · 3.352% of radius · 2025

94th percentile among 593 analyzed Nebraska localities · 96th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Magnet · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source: usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot: usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record: 189388
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2025-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 189388 classified pixels
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:2b23a466315a93447eff858ffc14
Official record: Open source ↗

Footprint history

95.9 / 100 persistence · HIGH

20082025

Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

95.5production depth

Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL

16,159 acres

Cedar County · 2022

How calculated

Cedar County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 31027:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 16,159 acres
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:7c7a4d37210139b8e04599500c70
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL

289 farms

Cedar County · 2022

How calculated

Cedar County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 31027:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 289 farms
Normalized unit: farms
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:e2c6be2b8228bf13145e60bb8e88
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL

4,867 acres

Cedar County · 2022

How calculated

Cedar County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 31027:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 4,867 acres
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:d10e917c0a7c113a7e7698cc33ab
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL

83 farms

Cedar County · 2022

How calculated

Cedar County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 31027:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 83 farms
Normalized unit: farms
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:5b88c0d509363021f3eecc8514ec
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL

30.1 percent

Cedar County · 2022

How calculated

Cedar County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 31027:alfalfa:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:10f35a2d0360b119e42b2e6e32e8
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL

52,068 tons

Cedar County · 2022

How calculated

Cedar County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 31027:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 52,068 tons
Normalized unit: tons
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:4f963de84e3a98ee13031fa8e936
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL

3.2 tons/acre

Cedar County · 2022

How calculated

Cedar County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 31027:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: tons/acre
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:b1c0fd96c80d27940b3e7976196f
Official record: Open source ↗

Beef CattleHISTORICAL

17,901 head

Cedar County · 2022

How calculated

Cedar County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 31027:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 17,901 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:b2910fc3571971c86c6dfe636b2b
Official record: Open source ↗

CattleHISTORICAL

99,336 head

Cedar County · 2022

How calculated

Cedar County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 31027:cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 99,336 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:002e0298d4832b38649752e0211a
Official record: Open source ↗

Dairy CattleHISTORICAL

518 head

Cedar County · 2022

How calculated

Cedar County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 31027:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 518 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:4f6278e58ffa0164b8e7654847ce
Official record: Open source ↗

EquineHISTORICAL

297 head

Cedar County · 2022

How calculated

Cedar County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 31027:equine:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 297 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:4b940d2b97d549c259fe6bfb7f5e
Official record: Open source ↗

Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL

0.2 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Cedar County · 2022

How calculated

Cedar County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 31027:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:473c8fc72cafe7d3230609368c33
Official record: Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation27.5 in

How calculated

OSMOND, NE US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: in
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:eac7f40e894025587322df73e534
Official record: Open source ↗

Annual mean temperature48.1 °F

How calculated

OSMOND, NE US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: °F
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:70819293dc2f3098f5b50ebcb896
Official record: Open source ↗

Station distance9.5 miles

How calculated

OSMOND, NE US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Magnet reference point to the official station.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: miles
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:1656f4233f77051779b4dd48f98b
Official record: Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST

100 percent

Magnet · 2026

How calculated

Magnet · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record: drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:7c33667b164474690baf9be8740b
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST

80.1 percent

Magnet · 2026

How calculated

Magnet · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record: drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:19d2333c0a6470561b65b949258f
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST

0 percent

Magnet · 2026

How calculated

Magnet · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record: drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:f96c517acbd15a8247697d8d4703
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST

D2 category

Magnet · 2026

How calculated

Magnet · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record: drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: category
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:0542de748504a02c15df55e4e390
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST

56 0-100

Magnet · 2026

How calculated

Magnet · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record: drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:de5f070774a04bd9881c752388dd
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Four Week TrendLATEST

IMPROVING category

Magnet · 2026

How calculated

Magnet · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record: drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: category
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:5133546b070455d506c40afe1652
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST

46 weeks

Magnet · 2026

How calculated

Magnet · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record: drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: weeks
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:868fbca5ab7b62e07069f4c9f2be
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST

66.9 0-100

Magnet · 2026

How calculated

Magnet · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record: drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-06-09
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:e6b9b38a6bc051a70c0a28c1d9c6
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST

60.9 0-100

Magnet · 2026

How calculated

Magnet · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record: drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-03-03
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:e4f0f201f67f4fbed24960b01c7a
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST

71.6 0-100

Magnet · 2026

How calculated

Magnet · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record: drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-08-04
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:44a3b13abc0c3ddb505735b1a5f2
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST

86.8 percent

Magnet · 2026

How calculated

Magnet · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record: drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:0337d5c8c25a7d04ffec033f4c2b
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST

51.1 percent

Magnet · 2026

How calculated

Magnet · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record: drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:076c4bb937a257450955cd211264
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.

Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Bale countWeight per bale (lb)

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Pickup price / baleLoaded route milesFreight / loaded mileUnloading totalStacking totalOther chargesPayload / load

Delivered total$0.00

Delivered equivalent—

Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Pickup price / baleLoaded route milesFreight / loaded mileUnloading totalStacking totalOther chargesPayload / load

Delivered total$0.00

Delivered equivalent—

Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.

Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

33.9sourcing difficulty

Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength

1. Alfalfa Hay in Tabor, South Dakota35.3 mi56,784 ac98.2 2. Alfalfa Hay in Utica, South Dakota36.3 mi56,122 ac97.3 3. Alfalfa Hay in Santee, Nebraska32.7 mi55,027 ac96 4. Alfalfa Hay in Lesterville, South Dakota40.7 mi55,244 ac95.9 5. Alfalfa Hay in Springfield, South Dakota35.5 mi54,759 ac95.6 6. Alfalfa Hay in Aten, Nebraska26.3 mi54,002 ac95 7. Alfalfa Hay in Yankton, South Dakota30.2 mi54,155 ac95 8. Alfalfa Hay in Bon Homme Colony, South Dakota30.7 mi54,146 ac95 9. Alfalfa Hay in Crofton, Nebraska19.1 mi51,814 ac92.5 10. Alfalfa Hay in Running Water, South Dakota34.4 mi52,229 ac92.3

Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Magnet?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Alfalfa Hay markets in Cedar Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Magnet

Barley Hay in Magnet, NebraskaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Bermudagrass Hay in Magnet, NebraskaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Brome Hay in Magnet, NebraskaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Clover Hay in Magnet, NebraskaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Fescue Hay in Magnet, NebraskaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Magnet, NebraskaContextual local forage evidence in this locality

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station

1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗

National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics

rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter

202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level

2022countyOfficial source ↗

Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 73 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.

Alfalfa Hayin Magnet, Nebraska

What the local hay data shows

What the evidence says now

Local alfalfa footprint

Footprint history

Production & livestock context

Price intelligence

Local climate context

Drought & moisture context

Visible supply & verified demand

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

Quote A

Quote B

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Need Alfalfa Hay in Magnet?

Continue through the evidence graph

County and agricultural-region markets

Other strongly supported hay types in Magnet

Methodology & sources

Alfalfa Hay
in Magnet, Nebraska