Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Harvard, Nebraska

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Harvard.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Local mapped footprint12,782.1 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth59.5 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence95.2 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty51.7 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal29.8 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Harvard. The latest 2025 raster shows 12,782 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 29th percentile among 593 analyzed Nebraska localities and the 78th percentile nationally. Clay County reports 3,826 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Farwell, Nebraska, 50 miles away with 36,322 mapped acres. HayQuotes has not yet stored enough recent marketplace observations here to publish supplier liquidity, so quote requests are the check for bale format, freight, timing, and availability.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 29th percentile among analyzed Nebraska localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT

Footprint history

95.2 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 14,696 acres · 31st regional percentile · 78th national percentile2009: 11,992 acres · 30th regional percentile · 76th national percentile2010: 12,809 acres · 42nd regional percentile · 74th national percentile2011: 12,859 acres · 47th regional percentile · 70th national percentile2012: 11,800 acres · 42nd regional percentile · 73rd national percentile2013: 13,113 acres · 43rd regional percentile · 77th national percentile2014: 14,280 acres · 40th regional percentile · 76th national percentile2015: 13,966 acres · 35th regional percentile · 73rd national percentile2016: 12,933 acres · 34th regional percentile · 71st national percentile2017: 12,974 acres · 31st regional percentile · 72nd national percentile2018: 13,198 acres · 25th regional percentile · 71st national percentile2019: 15,546 acres · 30th regional percentile · 74th national percentile2020: 18,050 acres · 29th regional percentile · 75th national percentile2021: 16,796 acres · 30th regional percentile · 76th national percentile2022: 15,890 acres · 30th regional percentile · 76th national percentile2023: 15,052 acres · 26th regional percentile · 76th national percentile2024: 9,928 acres · 34th regional percentile · 79th national percentile2025: 12,782 acres · 29th regional percentile · 78th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

59.5production depth
Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL
3,826 acres

Clay County · 2022

How calculated

Clay County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31035:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3,826 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:661dcee8bd9f107361076606a395
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL
88 farms

Clay County · 2022

How calculated

Clay County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31035:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
88 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:861b9a69d4ccd776fbdf1a31d27b
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
2,760 acres

Clay County · 2022

How calculated

Clay County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31035:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2,760 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:06d03ebba7fc947ad688b17fde7e
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
44 farms

Clay County · 2022

How calculated

Clay County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31035:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
44 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ae62d2c375f9b2753d7c1f3f686e
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
72.1 percent

Clay County · 2022

How calculated

Clay County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31035:alfalfa:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:cbbaa96286ede92cc992312cfa1e
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL
14,697 tons

Clay County · 2022

How calculated

Clay County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31035:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
14,697 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2300def663e3de7264de4b8c97a5
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL
3.8 tons/acre

Clay County · 2022

How calculated

Clay County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31035:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:931c064879026325aa3286cd636c
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Clay County · 2022

How calculated

Clay County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31035:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9ed6b4396343e0c607c7583d5e1d
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
50,961 head

Clay County · 2022

How calculated

Clay County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31035:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
50,961 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a960aae229fe6e138e6df80c68d5
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Clay County · 2022

How calculated

Clay County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31035:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:92c153eed2e5a303f02b48cd08dd
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
231 head

Clay County · 2022

How calculated

Clay County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31035:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
231 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:265f727a5761e6b5c737fc2d4990
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.1 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Clay County · 2022

How calculated

Clay County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31035:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e54f5a99372fb56769cd50454dfe
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation29.8 in
How calculated

CLAY CTR, NE US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1263f04a828cdb286a4a3023a864
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature51.6 °F
How calculated

CLAY CTR, NE US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:eb2e3958f5986510aba4e9b991b9
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance7.2 miles
How calculated

CLAY CTR, NE US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Harvard reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9d374f392f31d882cc36ada5b788
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Harvard · 2026

How calculated

Harvard · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ec945a7a934aec8729f703493599
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Harvard · 2026

How calculated

Harvard · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:56a1baabd78c79b2d7378d537d5f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Harvard · 2026

How calculated

Harvard · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:234e4c73d2c9496039d3ec4352c4
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
NONE category

Harvard · 2026

How calculated

Harvard · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:635508a51a314e547fc5ddede3c4
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
0.1 0-100

Harvard · 2026

How calculated

Harvard · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:83bf740331ecc0ac1730248d02e2
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
IMPROVING category

Harvard · 2026

How calculated

Harvard · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d239c5cc5dda52a84cd7c777c2ba
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
15 weeks

Harvard · 2026

How calculated

Harvard · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:aeba69a1e55ba17f6109feb7b76e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
35.5 0-100

Harvard · 2026

How calculated

Harvard · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:dd887a4225f36bcad58b7b055087
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
40 0-100

Harvard · 2026

How calculated

Harvard · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:111df6a28aa486f7a5f24a6cc146
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
7.7 0-100

Harvard · 2026

How calculated

Harvard · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8ed76b048ad8cea90aebb461a5cb
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
28.9 percent

Harvard · 2026

How calculated

Harvard · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a0b8b8d87695273fdfb1357b999a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
18.5 percent

Harvard · 2026

How calculated

Harvard · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b02bd057b7902994c9944ee9edbe
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

51.7sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Harvard?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 73 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.