Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Ashton, Nebraska

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Ashton.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Local mapped footprint40,934.4 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth94.5 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence94.5 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty33.4 / 100LOW

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal26.5 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Ashton. The latest 2025 raster shows 40,934 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 93rd percentile among 593 analyzed Nebraska localities and the 96th percentile nationally. Sherman County reports 10,622 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Loup City, Nebraska, 9.2 miles away with 43,113 mapped acres. The current drought signal is D0 as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

Ashton ranks among the strongest persistent mapped alfalfa footprints in Nebraska.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2008-30m
  • usda-cdl-2009-30m
  • usda-cdl-2010-30m
  • usda-cdl-2011-30m
  • usda-cdl-2012-30m
  • usda-cdl-2013-30m
  • usda-cdl-2014-30m
  • usda-cdl-2015-30m
  • usda-cdl-2016-30m
  • usda-cdl-2017-30m
  • usda-cdl-2018-30m
  • usda-cdl-2019-30m
  • usda-cdl-2020-30m
  • usda-cdl-2021-30m
  • usda-cdl-2022-30m
  • usda-cdl-2023-30m
  • usda-cdl-2024-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT

Footprint history

94.5 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 44,677 acres · 89th regional percentile · 93rd national percentile2009: 40,542 acres · 89th regional percentile · 92nd national percentile2010: 34,147 acres · 87th regional percentile · 89th national percentile2011: 32,691 acres · 89th regional percentile · 88th national percentile2012: 36,434 acres · 92nd regional percentile · 90th national percentile2013: 39,698 acres · 93rd regional percentile · 93rd national percentile2014: 41,250 acres · 92nd regional percentile · 91st national percentile2015: 46,071 acres · 94th regional percentile · 91st national percentile2016: 45,438 acres · 94th regional percentile · 91st national percentile2017: 46,178 acres · 94th regional percentile · 92nd national percentile2018: 48,808 acres · 94th regional percentile · 93rd national percentile2019: 53,437 acres · 96th regional percentile · 93rd national percentile2020: 56,283 acres · 93rd regional percentile · 94th national percentile2021: 49,829 acres · 91st regional percentile · 93rd national percentile2022: 46,512 acres · 90th regional percentile · 93rd national percentile2023: 51,734 acres · 92nd regional percentile · 94th national percentile2024: 32,119 acres · 86th regional percentile · 94th national percentile2025: 40,934 acres · 94th regional percentile · 96th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

94.5production depth
Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL
10,622 acres

Sherman County · 2022

How calculated

Sherman County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31163:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
10,622 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c3178c74e671ad12ff6e52c93eff
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL
114 farms

Sherman County · 2022

How calculated

Sherman County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31163:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
114 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:de538bf9154bcf341675bb0a11e9
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
3,321 acres

Sherman County · 2022

How calculated

Sherman County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31163:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3,321 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6079d9f9954a14a6da951f9bbead
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
57 farms

Sherman County · 2022

How calculated

Sherman County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31163:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
57 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e1adc061640c1e95b083df5545c9
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
31.3 percent

Sherman County · 2022

How calculated

Sherman County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31163:alfalfa:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:641973d780c523f548db0eeadd8b
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL
35,478 tons

Sherman County · 2022

How calculated

Sherman County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31163:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
35,478 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5b0380ea8976b18d8971778a9926
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL
3.3 tons/acre

Sherman County · 2022

How calculated

Sherman County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31163:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b98c09b7f7abe25b3f8060077389
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
20,153 head

Sherman County · 2022

How calculated

Sherman County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31163:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
20,153 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:18d3057104b39203fe8cb0a5a7d8
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
43,369 head

Sherman County · 2022

How calculated

Sherman County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31163:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
43,369 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:59d8f3b4e29dd3a6dfb937d4719b
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
- head

Sherman County · 2022

How calculated

Sherman County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31163:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4b47a69522966d52a78bddb2e970
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
235 head

Sherman County · 2022

How calculated

Sherman County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31163:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
235 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0a6f5332d270150735be9874a839
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.3 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Sherman County · 2022

How calculated

Sherman County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31163:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:085001d980d6db23d1fd591faac3
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation26.5 in
How calculated

LOUP CITY, NE US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6a311a18da920574ef9c5012f221
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature50.1 °F
How calculated

LOUP CITY, NE US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a877660463013c9112199dc4fdb5
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance9.3 miles
How calculated

LOUP CITY, NE US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Ashton reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:dae51c2c044bc4d1629ca2d6f584
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Ashton · 2026

How calculated

Ashton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c198fd7eca3449c6ff1c94c30503
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Ashton · 2026

How calculated

Ashton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1e4aadabe3c9899a82e1780ade0c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Ashton · 2026

How calculated

Ashton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:be4823efe9ef792a0435851daa5a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D0 category

Ashton · 2026

How calculated

Ashton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:aef81c29dbf28d8b6ca6516e1edf
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
12.6 0-100

Ashton · 2026

How calculated

Ashton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4ce86f12a10ec10edd3545897b56
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
IMPROVING category

Ashton · 2026

How calculated

Ashton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:794141fc9f69f137d76bc1bbffbd
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
35 weeks

Ashton · 2026

How calculated

Ashton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e93f47a2fb2b64bdb80707eae1dd
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
60 0-100

Ashton · 2026

How calculated

Ashton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6428f42a07d8948c0467145e65d7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
60 0-100

Ashton · 2026

How calculated

Ashton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:69a827037ed06c95918e8ed2ba9a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
32.6 0-100

Ashton · 2026

How calculated

Ashton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:db525f24b1dfba775c5482598bf6
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
61.9 percent

Ashton · 2026

How calculated

Ashton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:eb448ef21e621495581aa5b93df4
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
29.5 percent

Ashton · 2026

How calculated

Ashton · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:69a3525eec6a5bbacc2f706d193e
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

33.4sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Ashton?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 72 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.