Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Lame Deer, Montana

Name: Alfalfa market intelligence for Lame Deer, Montana
Creator: HayQuotes
License: https://hayquotes.com/terms

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Lame Deer.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Lame Deer

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT

Local mapped footprint11,463.3 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth56.7 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence89.4 / 100HIGH

Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS

Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS

Sourcing difficulty55.4 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal15.7 in1991–2020 NORMAL

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Lame Deer

Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Lame Deer. The latest 2025 raster shows 11,463 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 27th percentile among 497 analyzed Montana localities and the 76th percentile nationally. Rosebud County reports 34,978 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Park City, Montana, 112 miles away with 47,592 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 22.7% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED

Local supplyMODERATE

Nearby sourcingSTRONG

Drought pressureMODERATE

MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 27th percentile among analyzed Montana localities.

Trace this statement

usda-cdl-2025-30m

Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT

5 mi

228 ac

10 mi

1,164 ac

25 mi

11,463 ac

50 mi

71,087 ac

100 mi

271,925 ac

150 mi

635,662 ac

250 mi

1,824,699 ac

Within 25 miles11,463mapped acres · 0.912% of radius · 2025

27th percentile among 497 analyzed Montana localities · 76th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Lame Deer · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source: usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot: usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record: 51545
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2025-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 51545 classified pixels
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:f9a781b3f433a28568fa864c6024
Official record: Open source ↗

Footprint history

89.4 / 100 persistence · HIGH

20082025

Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

56.7production depth

Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL

34,978 acres

Rosebud County · 2022

How calculated

Rosebud County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30087:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 34,978 acres
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:db608b95e5ee842360b333d2f578
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL

140 farms

Rosebud County · 2022

How calculated

Rosebud County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30087:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 140 farms
Normalized unit: farms
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:e57e33bc420f3d9712784f831646
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL

13,505 acres

Rosebud County · 2022

How calculated

Rosebud County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30087:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 13,505 acres
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:dc5207859076ac233ca90ce67deb
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL

82 farms

Rosebud County · 2022

How calculated

Rosebud County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30087:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 82 farms
Normalized unit: farms
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:10fd555fe9ea7398d3cfac4a4e58
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL

38.6 percent

Rosebud County · 2022

How calculated

Rosebud County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30087:alfalfa:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:7fe476a7c33e4761b4a717c83d09
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL

71,724 tons

Rosebud County · 2022

How calculated

Rosebud County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30087:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 71,724 tons
Normalized unit: tons
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:eea56fe87988e62f1243b8720efa
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL

2.1 tons/acre

Rosebud County · 2022

How calculated

Rosebud County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30087:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: tons/acre
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:224127d2bc3f3806988716d91d7a
Official record: Open source ↗

Beef CattleHISTORICAL

40,724 head

Rosebud County · 2022

How calculated

Rosebud County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30087:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 40,724 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:7a6b3b187483395505346a95356c
Official record: Open source ↗

CattleHISTORICAL

66,397 head

Rosebud County · 2022

How calculated

Rosebud County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30087:cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 66,397 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:6cd9e23c01142b6db4d613809107
Official record: Open source ↗

Dairy CattleHISTORICAL

5 head

Rosebud County · 2022

How calculated

Rosebud County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30087:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 5 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:acf971231f9a2f49594074ae68eb
Official record: Open source ↗

EquineHISTORICAL

2,167 head

Rosebud County · 2022

How calculated

Rosebud County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30087:equine:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 2,167 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:a40d956c44333caa0c11a74496da
Official record: Open source ↗

Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL

0.8 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Rosebud County · 2022

How calculated

Rosebud County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30087:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:0464aed0cba771924f6090196661
Official record: Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation15.7 in

How calculated

BUSBY, MT US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: in
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:fd2c55bc9a77fbce8b26547a29ae
Official record: Open source ↗

Annual mean temperature45 °F

How calculated

BUSBY, MT US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: °F
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:1b24b5be98223245043d432e5cbf
Official record: Open source ↗

Station distance17.6 miles

How calculated

BUSBY, MT US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Lame Deer reference point to the official station.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: miles
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:6e86e07089a744cf6f2539e324f9
Official record: Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST

96.8 percent

Lame Deer · 2026

How calculated

Lame Deer · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:0f28db0be576719a66067a276f7e
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST

22.7 percent

Lame Deer · 2026

How calculated

Lame Deer · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:0cadcb4f383a05dd600f0a2d48dd
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST

0 percent

Lame Deer · 2026

How calculated

Lame Deer · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:b49f4db61beb6c1feb899d6fcfab
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST

D1 category

Lame Deer · 2026

How calculated

Lame Deer · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: category
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:73180040326c6e4a0ab9b7df5b92
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST

43.9 0-100

Lame Deer · 2026

How calculated

Lame Deer · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:9c3b76eb1c4f5c90f0060655262d
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Four Week TrendLATEST

STABLE category

Lame Deer · 2026

How calculated

Lame Deer · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: category
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:76d4b91343b7fbdbbc5842e18844
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST

27 weeks

Lame Deer · 2026

How calculated

Lame Deer · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: weeks
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:773d3af64818b3bc57d330c549ea
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST

43.9 0-100

Lame Deer · 2026

How calculated

Lame Deer · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-06-09
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:d0d516e42c4ca8e9e9c487864ce0
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST

31.6 0-100

Lame Deer · 2026

How calculated

Lame Deer · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-03-03
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:1c7faded07ece372d18793adf6bb
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST

43 0-100

Lame Deer · 2026

How calculated

Lame Deer · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-08-04
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:1463c5f0ae02680f95c6eb6565d5
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST

43.2 percent

Lame Deer · 2026

How calculated

Lame Deer · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:715970189991c1a5e554c96b0ee7
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST

4.4 percent

Lame Deer · 2026

How calculated

Lame Deer · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:3757fdc9de744d836cbd68e403cb
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.

Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Bale countWeight per bale (lb)

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Pickup price / baleLoaded route milesFreight / loaded mileUnloading totalStacking totalOther chargesPayload / load

Delivered total$0.00

Delivered equivalent—

Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Pickup price / baleLoaded route milesFreight / loaded mileUnloading totalStacking totalOther chargesPayload / load

Delivered total$0.00

Delivered equivalent—

Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.

Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

55.4sourcing difficulty

Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength

1. Alfalfa Hay in Park City, Montana111.7 mi47,592 ac94.4 2. Alfalfa Hay in Rapelje, Montana129.7 mi46,486 ac91.8 3. Alfalfa Hay in Columbus, Montana127.3 mi46,014 ac91.1 4. Alfalfa Hay in Broadus, Montana59.6 mi42,363 ac88.8 5. Alfalfa Hay in Rockvale, Montana109.4 mi43,647 ac88.3 6. Alfalfa Hay in Acton, Montana101.8 mi43,020 ac87.7 7. Alfalfa Hay in Montaqua, Montana111.3 mi42,764 ac86.8 8. Alfalfa Hay in Laurel, Montana104.6 mi42,079 ac86.1 9. Alfalfa Hay in Silesia, Montana107.7 mi42,164 ac86.1 10. Alfalfa Hay in Joliet, Montana114.5 mi39,913 ac82.2

Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Lame Deer?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Alfalfa Hay markets in Rosebud Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Lame Deer

Barley Hay in Lame Deer, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Bermudagrass Hay in Lame Deer, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Brome Hay in Lame Deer, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Clover Hay in Lame Deer, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Fescue Hay in Lame Deer, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Lame Deer, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this locality

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station

1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗

National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics

rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter

202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level

2022countyOfficial source ↗

Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 73 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.

Alfalfa Hayin Lame Deer, Montana

What the local hay data shows

What the evidence says now

Local alfalfa footprint

Footprint history

Production & livestock context

Price intelligence

Local climate context

Drought & moisture context

Visible supply & verified demand

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

Quote A

Quote B

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Need Alfalfa Hay in Lame Deer?

Continue through the evidence graph

County and agricultural-region markets

Other strongly supported hay types in Lame Deer

Methodology & sources

Alfalfa Hay
in Lame Deer, Montana