Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Gardiner, Montana

Name: Alfalfa market intelligence for Gardiner, Montana
Creator: HayQuotes
License: https://hayquotes.com/terms

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Gardiner.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Gardiner

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT

Local mapped footprint2,395.2 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth46.7 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence92.7 / 100HIGH

Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS

Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS

Sourcing difficulty60.3 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal13.9 in1991–2020 NORMAL

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Gardiner

Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Gardiner. The latest 2025 raster shows 2,395 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 7th percentile among 497 analyzed Montana localities and the 51st percentile nationally. Park County reports 46,660 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Sugar City, Idaho, 96 miles away with 77,067 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 0.5% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED

Local supplyMODERATE

Nearby sourcingSTRONG

Drought pressureLOW

MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 7th percentile among analyzed Montana localities.

Trace this statement

usda-cdl-2025-30m

Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT

5 mi

14 ac

10 mi

28 ac

25 mi

2,395 ac

50 mi

24,264 ac

100 mi

318,040 ac

150 mi

776,523 ac

250 mi

1,964,362 ac

Within 25 miles2,395mapped acres · 0.191% of radius · 2025

7th percentile among 497 analyzed Montana localities · 51th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Gardiner · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source: usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot: usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record: 10770
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2025-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 10770 classified pixels
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:835c0dae1dddc0e1d4bb26843edb
Official record: Open source ↗

Footprint history

92.7 / 100 persistence · HIGH

20082025

Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

46.7production depth

Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL

46,660 acres

Park County · 2022

How calculated

Park County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30067:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 46,660 acres
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:23f880ecaa0fcf9ea75fd0e812ea
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL

182 farms

Park County · 2022

How calculated

Park County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30067:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 182 farms
Normalized unit: farms
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:a184db989a7395bf815e4e6a1e9d
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL

35,262 acres

Park County · 2022

How calculated

Park County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30067:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 35,262 acres
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:b9921722accd8daf6cec43629435
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL

143 farms

Park County · 2022

How calculated

Park County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30067:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 143 farms
Normalized unit: farms
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:f3fe5e1bfda311664ff1ef2f8632
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL

75.6 percent

Park County · 2022

How calculated

Park County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30067:alfalfa:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:573fe837d23bc6ba83ef0acac181
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL

95,401 tons

Park County · 2022

How calculated

Park County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30067:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 95,401 tons
Normalized unit: tons
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:e0310fc09d77af623a1e08253877
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL

2 tons/acre

Park County · 2022

How calculated

Park County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30067:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: tons/acre
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:7421b485c3525d0afb7b161ef5c6
Official record: Open source ↗

Beef CattleHISTORICAL

(D) head

Park County · 2022

How calculated

Park County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30067:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: (D) head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:87bcd3821301236bc7955baf74c9
Official record: Open source ↗

CattleHISTORICAL

41,838 head

Park County · 2022

How calculated

Park County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30067:cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 41,838 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:3d9b315c7d49f7d3e666b3ff6f46
Official record: Open source ↗

Dairy CattleHISTORICAL

(D) head

Park County · 2022

How calculated

Park County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30067:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: (D) head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:f65f4aae64e256f2f0eb4646ea39
Official record: Open source ↗

EquineHISTORICAL

1,914 head

Park County · 2022

How calculated

Park County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30067:equine:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 1,914 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:d74ad059c4051c52c9f8342efbaa
Official record: Open source ↗

Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL

1.1 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Park County · 2022

How calculated

Park County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 30067:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:62822a94295c21e293f18f712124
Official record: Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation13.9 in

How calculated

GARDINER, MT US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: in
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:635772d3a025edd6ac4c024a7e74
Official record: Open source ↗

Annual mean temperature46.3 °F

How calculated

GARDINER, MT US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: °F
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:ee9784a781e7cb6f5c36d3504e84
Official record: Open source ↗

Station distance2.2 miles

How calculated

GARDINER, MT US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Gardiner reference point to the official station.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: miles
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:c509b43a5633668331909e5690dd
Official record: Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST

93.9 percent

Gardiner · 2026

How calculated

Gardiner · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:25225c67bdc3883c696255202c2b
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST

0.5 percent

Gardiner · 2026

How calculated

Gardiner · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:e4ee4d5aaae275f97fd99ff9ed7c
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST

0 percent

Gardiner · 2026

How calculated

Gardiner · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:5dfee56565548f7d2eb2f5fd94bb
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST

D1 category

Gardiner · 2026

How calculated

Gardiner · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: category
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:379b6fd777f19d215748042f324b
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST

38.9 0-100

Gardiner · 2026

How calculated

Gardiner · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:1c0bfa602f1eac51a285996fd8e5
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Four Week TrendLATEST

STABLE category

Gardiner · 2026

How calculated

Gardiner · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: category
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:ee30d56d66459d5e50f6feb2977a
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST

23 weeks

Gardiner · 2026

How calculated

Gardiner · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: weeks
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:4683857c37dbf5b4efb8f1840501
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST

46 0-100

Gardiner · 2026

How calculated

Gardiner · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-06-09
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:65acc480416102715ce5bb51f9ca
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST

19.8 0-100

Gardiner · 2026

How calculated

Gardiner · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-03-03
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:48a436394086ac17aad34c76a897
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST

40.1 0-100

Gardiner · 2026

How calculated

Gardiner · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-08-04
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:17677120c37b53095b757c0e3a67
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST

53.6 percent

Gardiner · 2026

How calculated

Gardiner · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:4973f4b7e470017035e14cbd51b4
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST

13.7 percent

Gardiner · 2026

How calculated

Gardiner · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record: drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:11d0a31b82b841c5be5b976d4c8b
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.

Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Bale countWeight per bale (lb)

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Pickup price / baleLoaded route milesFreight / loaded mileUnloading totalStacking totalOther chargesPayload / load

Delivered total$0.00

Delivered equivalent—

Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Pickup price / baleLoaded route milesFreight / loaded mileUnloading totalStacking totalOther chargesPayload / load

Delivered total$0.00

Delivered equivalent—

Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.

Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

60.3sourcing difficulty

Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength

1. Alfalfa Hay in Sugar City, Idaho95.5 mi77,067 ac95.2 2. Alfalfa Hay in Newdale, Idaho91.2 mi74,861 ac93.3 3. Alfalfa Hay in Teton, Idaho92.7 mi74,754 ac93.1 4. Alfalfa Hay in Parker, Idaho90.8 mi66,077 ac84.8 5. Alfalfa Hay in St. Anthony, Idaho88.4 mi62,141 ac81.1 6. Alfalfa Hay in Dubois, Idaho95.3 mi57,063 ac75.8 7. Alfalfa Hay in Three Forks, Montana70 mi53,203 ac73.3 8. Alfalfa Hay in Logan, Montana66.3 mi52,633 ac72.9 9. Alfalfa Hay in Gallatin River Ranch, Montana65.3 mi50,428 ac70.8 10. Alfalfa Hay in Manhattan, Montana62.7 mi49,661 ac70.2

Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Gardiner?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Alfalfa Hay markets in Park Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Gardiner

Barley Hay in Gardiner, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Bermudagrass Hay in Gardiner, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Brome Hay in Gardiner, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Clover Hay in Gardiner, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Fescue Hay in Gardiner, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Gardiner, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this locality

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station

1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗

National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics

rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter

202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level

2022countyOfficial source ↗

Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 73 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.

Alfalfa Hayin Gardiner, Montana

What the local hay data shows

What the evidence says now

Local alfalfa footprint

Footprint history

Production & livestock context

Price intelligence

Local climate context

Drought & moisture context

Visible supply & verified demand

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

Quote A

Quote B

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Need Alfalfa Hay in Gardiner?

Continue through the evidence graph

County and agricultural-region markets

Other strongly supported hay types in Gardiner

Methodology & sources

Alfalfa Hay
in Gardiner, Montana