HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Boulder, Montana

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Boulder.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Local mapped footprint6,023.6 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth49.8 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence95.9 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty55.8 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal10.8 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Boulder
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Boulder. The latest 2025 raster shows 6,024 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 11th percentile among 497 analyzed Montana localities and the 64th percentile nationally. Jefferson County reports 17,304 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Three Forks, Montana, 36 miles away with 53,203 mapped acres. The current drought signal is D0 as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 11th percentile among analyzed Montana localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT
Within 25 miles6,024mapped acres · 0.479% of radius · 2025

11th percentile among 497 analyzed Montana localities · 64th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Boulder · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
27085
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
27085 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d2533ab83f745440609149571f44
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

95.9 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 5,507 acres · 10th regional percentile · 62nd national percentile2009: 5,716 acres · 11th regional percentile · 65th national percentile2010: 6,447 acres · 13th regional percentile · 64th national percentile2011: 5,678 acres · 11th regional percentile · 58th national percentile2012: 5,660 acres · 12th regional percentile · 64th national percentile2013: 6,047 acres · 13th regional percentile · 65th national percentile2014: 7,666 acres · 10th regional percentile · 66th national percentile2015: 6,896 acres · 10th regional percentile · 62nd national percentile2016: 6,712 acres · 10th regional percentile · 62nd national percentile2017: 6,965 acres · 9th regional percentile · 63rd national percentile2018: 7,003 acres · 9th regional percentile · 63rd national percentile2019: 6,993 acres · 9th regional percentile · 63rd national percentile2020: 6,797 acres · 9th regional percentile · 62nd national percentile2021: 7,205 acres · 9th regional percentile · 64th national percentile2022: 6,278 acres · 9th regional percentile · 63rd national percentile2023: 6,845 acres · 9th regional percentile · 65th national percentile2024: 4,592 acres · 19th regional percentile · 69th national percentile2025: 6,024 acres · 11th regional percentile · 64th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

49.8production depth
Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL
17,304 acres

Jefferson County · 2022

How calculated

Jefferson County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30043:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
17,304 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9b27f0d63dd322d538a68225f5b0
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL
101 farms

Jefferson County · 2022

How calculated

Jefferson County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30043:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
101 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a8e5f2bbfac31e06e9c9851e153d
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
14,324 acres

Jefferson County · 2022

How calculated

Jefferson County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30043:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
14,324 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4b688767d148f3e1ef22536e49e3
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
85 farms

Jefferson County · 2022

How calculated

Jefferson County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30043:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
85 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:04b5c9a9657d8efed9504acc4cdb
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
82.8 percent

Jefferson County · 2022

How calculated

Jefferson County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30043:alfalfa:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:20080cd3d108b4692fa7a9ef92e2
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL
42,792 tons

Jefferson County · 2022

How calculated

Jefferson County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30043:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
42,792 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:58cf564ff8976d77938f4393ea18
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL
2.5 tons/acre

Jefferson County · 2022

How calculated

Jefferson County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30043:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8995f60e98c3c6448c4f6be36854
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
17,909 head

Jefferson County · 2022

How calculated

Jefferson County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30043:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
17,909 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:91ec9a6b6b952d677ddbd98b841e
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
27,420 head

Jefferson County · 2022

How calculated

Jefferson County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30043:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
27,420 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ef7ca142e53974864f71b7e513b5
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
9 head

Jefferson County · 2022

How calculated

Jefferson County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30043:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
9 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4533774248483707e783d17fe629
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
1,211 head

Jefferson County · 2022

How calculated

Jefferson County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30043:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,211 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:32c2fe7b95ebd23bd8cbe015d328
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.8 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Jefferson County · 2022

How calculated

Jefferson County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30043:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:971d228ea165b77a33499d8604a2
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation10.8 in
How calculated

BOULDER, MT US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:825ec2135c841a12e296aa9f8c6c
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature42.6 °F
How calculated

BOULDER, MT US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ec397142d59b1fb28831c38b88b7
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance0.4 miles
How calculated

BOULDER, MT US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Boulder reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:873b715c971f1e0133ff084b3e06
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
15.6 percent

Boulder · 2026

How calculated

Boulder · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c83715cde77c75426afb285ada67
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Boulder · 2026

How calculated

Boulder · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ddeab72cd52f04ac34f286ecf972
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Boulder · 2026

How calculated

Boulder · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:103776c208d91044ddd88fc64555
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D0 category

Boulder · 2026

How calculated

Boulder · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0ebd410c1b42c3517b41436e7e04
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
22.6 0-100

Boulder · 2026

How calculated

Boulder · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9bdf76b95f3642897f05f874ce2c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
IMPROVING category

Boulder · 2026

How calculated

Boulder · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:104b264ecda314fa0aa2c245f3ac
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
30 weeks

Boulder · 2026

How calculated

Boulder · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f9dde0e996a6b9636baa7fc43172
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
30.4 0-100

Boulder · 2026

How calculated

Boulder · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f5b37fa15734fa0b09ebebc406ae
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
40 0-100

Boulder · 2026

How calculated

Boulder · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f589ec6b2ffa04194e7f7972e3ec
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
31.9 0-100

Boulder · 2026

How calculated

Boulder · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3d34a4e6f509b9cb85f49bde3fac
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
52.9 percent

Boulder · 2026

How calculated

Boulder · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f86d3b98ce01172377bbfd400205
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
1.7 percent

Boulder · 2026

How calculated

Boulder · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2bec3975de465e01fe839d05aacd
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

55.8sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Alfalfa Hay in Three Forks, Montana36.2 mi53,203 ac98.22. Alfalfa Hay in Logan, Montana41.3 mi52,633 ac97.13. Alfalfa Hay in Wheatland, Montana32.1 mi50,118 ac944. Alfalfa Hay in Gallatin River Ranch, Montana44.3 mi50,428 ac93.95. Alfalfa Hay in Willow Creek, Montana37.1 mi49,591 ac93.16. Alfalfa Hay in Manhattan, Montana46 mi49,661 ac92.77. Alfalfa Hay in Ponderosa Pines, Montana38.7 mi46,110 ac88.18. Alfalfa Hay in Twin Bridges, Montana49 mi46,318 ac87.89. Alfalfa Hay in Sheridan, Montana53.8 mi45,192 ac8610. Alfalfa Hay in Brandon, Montana53.2 mi44,623 ac85.2
Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Boulder?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Alfalfa Hay markets in Jefferson Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Boulder

Barley Hay in Boulder, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Boulder, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Boulder, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Boulder, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Boulder, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this localityGrass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Boulder, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 73 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.