Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Belgrade, Montana

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Belgrade.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Local mapped footprint38,275.5 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth88 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence93 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty36.3 / 100LOW

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal13.4 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Belgrade. The latest 2025 raster shows 38,276 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 82nd percentile among 497 analyzed Montana localities and the 96th percentile nationally. Gallatin County reports 52,598 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Three Forks, Montana, 20 miles away with 53,203 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 71% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 82nd percentile among analyzed Montana localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT

Footprint history

93 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 63,899 acres · 82nd regional percentile · 96th national percentile2009: 56,454 acres · 81st regional percentile · 95th national percentile2010: 57,034 acres · 90th regional percentile · 94th national percentile2011: 46,059 acres · 81st regional percentile · 92nd national percentile2012: 41,620 acres · 81st regional percentile · 91st national percentile2013: 45,015 acres · 84th regional percentile · 94th national percentile2014: 58,914 acres · 71st regional percentile · 95th national percentile2015: 54,114 acres · 74th regional percentile · 93rd national percentile2016: 56,084 acres · 73rd regional percentile · 94th national percentile2017: 56,435 acres · 73rd regional percentile · 94th national percentile2018: 66,715 acres · 74th regional percentile · 96th national percentile2019: 66,978 acres · 73rd regional percentile · 95th national percentile2020: 72,503 acres · 74th regional percentile · 96th national percentile2021: 69,894 acres · 72nd regional percentile · 96th national percentile2022: 68,738 acres · 71st regional percentile · 96th national percentile2023: 69,276 acres · 73rd regional percentile · 97th national percentile2024: 34,681 acres · 82nd regional percentile · 95th national percentile2025: 38,276 acres · 82nd regional percentile · 96th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

88production depth
Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL
52,598 acres

Gallatin County · 2022

How calculated

Gallatin County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30031:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
52,598 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1ced7388ce34d74d0f2adfbe4f7e
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL
323 farms

Gallatin County · 2022

How calculated

Gallatin County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30031:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
323 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b4d94be12d250bbd0a28fe381986
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
36,882 acres

Gallatin County · 2022

How calculated

Gallatin County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30031:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
36,882 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:669e9bc126f310a287f63209352b
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
192 farms

Gallatin County · 2022

How calculated

Gallatin County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30031:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
192 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:27c7cc3076c5b404b37c02055158
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
70.1 percent

Gallatin County · 2022

How calculated

Gallatin County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30031:alfalfa:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c69e784ca463bdf83c91fad92695
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL
159,974 tons

Gallatin County · 2022

How calculated

Gallatin County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30031:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
159,974 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:21207d421e1599bc3d83afe50f58
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL
3 tons/acre

Gallatin County · 2022

How calculated

Gallatin County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30031:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:dd4f1515167bec93ee51c301de58
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
14,026 head

Gallatin County · 2022

How calculated

Gallatin County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30031:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
14,026 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:07ca773e49ffc43a9c9822b428c5
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
33,714 head

Gallatin County · 2022

How calculated

Gallatin County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30031:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
33,714 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5d1b7283434b1b541d24d95d6fd4
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
1,846 head

Gallatin County · 2022

How calculated

Gallatin County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30031:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,846 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:919356c8ce0b7f8302cf2ffd84d7
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
3,507 head

Gallatin County · 2022

How calculated

Gallatin County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30031:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3,507 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6dc11318876771131775b88b3292
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
1.6 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Gallatin County · 2022

How calculated

Gallatin County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30031:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:323fda1e02d54b659b2ed5afc2d2
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation13.4 in
How calculated

BOZEMAN GALLATIN FLD, MT US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:684523b4b9643b79ad16ff19078f
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature42.9 °F
How calculated

BOZEMAN GALLATIN FLD, MT US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ca2f48b8d71fd70920daab72188b
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance0.9 miles
How calculated

BOZEMAN GALLATIN FLD, MT US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Belgrade reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d746e3175b96c46a788304b1c31b
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
71 percent

Belgrade · 2026

How calculated

Belgrade · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e3ef8c5b4c270ec6f6d672cfefd8
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Belgrade · 2026

How calculated

Belgrade · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c5f4cca7f60606aa3a435f8be6da
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Belgrade · 2026

How calculated

Belgrade · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:54522cb2973dbc976c58f16cd82f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D1 category

Belgrade · 2026

How calculated

Belgrade · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d57068d744bb9c9d57ceb1f259a5
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
34.2 0-100

Belgrade · 2026

How calculated

Belgrade · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:549c335bfb8b22239beb9c4afa1f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
IMPROVING category

Belgrade · 2026

How calculated

Belgrade · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5aa5d7d3ebe5abda7f8838494e9b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
31 weeks

Belgrade · 2026

How calculated

Belgrade · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:98b0b94c78213ece9f64aa9fd725
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
55.6 0-100

Belgrade · 2026

How calculated

Belgrade · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:aa0cfbbda3c125f8cdbc42a40408
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
32.3 0-100

Belgrade · 2026

How calculated

Belgrade · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:413a64f8da89141c26d5a3742815
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
40 0-100

Belgrade · 2026

How calculated

Belgrade · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5d5d7b508f47c8b44639113d2b31
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
71.7 percent

Belgrade · 2026

How calculated

Belgrade · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f7c585a428e5e92ee64478740b19
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
33.1 percent

Belgrade · 2026

How calculated

Belgrade · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:562e5f2ae22972a746a024844c5d
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

36.3sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Belgrade?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 73 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.