Alfalfa
Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04
Alfalfa Hay
in Ashley, Missouri
Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Ashley.
Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.
Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.
Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.
Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.
Local interpretation
What the local hay data shows
USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Ashley. The latest 2025 raster shows 2,233 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 64th percentile among 1,081 analyzed Missouri localities and the 50th percentile nationally. Pike County reports 5,905 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Beverly, Illinois, 39 miles away with 6,617 mapped acres. The current drought signal is D0 as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.
Buyer decision panel
What the evidence says now
Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED
The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 64th percentile among analyzed Missouri localities.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map
Local alfalfa footprint
Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.
5 mi
112 ac
10 mi
392 ac
25 mi
2,233 ac
50 mi
12,632 ac
100 mi
62,944 ac
150 mi
186,002 ac
250 mi
719,015 ac
Within 25 miles2,233mapped acres · 0.178% of radius · 2025
64th percentile among 1,081 analyzed Missouri localities · 50th percentile nationally.
How calculated
Ashley · radius
Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.
- Source
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
- Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174- Source record
10039- Evidence
- EXACT
- Period
- 2025-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 10039 classified pixels
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:8c9aaa4c9fb279b2f2e447a2305f- Official record
- Open source ↗
Footprint history
75.1 / 100 persistence · HIGH
20082025
Agricultural census
Production & livestock context
The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.
72.7production depth
Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL
5,905 acresPike County · 2022
How calculated
Pike County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
29163:alfalfa_acres:2022- Evidence
- EXACT
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 5,905 acres
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:4af58aa85cfc10dfb0f40309a3a6- Official record
- Open source ↗
Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL
94 farmsPike County · 2022
How calculated
Pike County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
29163:alfalfa_farms:2022- Evidence
- EXACT
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 94 farms
- Normalized unit
- farms
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:bbddfbcc56ceeb4ca16723637c16- Official record
- Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
300 acresPike County · 2022
How calculated
Pike County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
29163:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022- Evidence
- EXACT
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 300 acres
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:86ec9bf4a2d572e24c4d324d4ca0- Official record
- Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
3 farmsPike County · 2022
How calculated
Pike County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
29163:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022- Evidence
- EXACT
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 3 farms
- Normalized unit
- farms
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:415b1bcece271efdcd2d11d93665- Official record
- Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
5.1 percentPike County · 2022
How calculated
Pike County · county
Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
29163:alfalfa:irrigated-share:2022- Evidence
- EXACT
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:214d5bc29c4cfd4e061c6328563a- Official record
- Open source ↗
Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL
15,834 tonsPike County · 2022
How calculated
Pike County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
29163:alfalfa_production:2022- Evidence
- EXACT
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 15,834 tons
- Normalized unit
- tons
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:ede3aa9f154afad3ccf6730e03a2- Official record
- Open source ↗
Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL
2.7 tons/acrePike County · 2022
How calculated
Pike County · county
Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
29163:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022- Evidence
- EXACT
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- tons/acre
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:af26b053710f7fac081e1c1041c5- Official record
- Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
14,592 headPike County · 2022
How calculated
Pike County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
29163:beef_cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 14,592 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:7cb999b471cabe634dfb292852bf- Official record
- Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
29,426 headPike County · 2022
How calculated
Pike County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
29163:cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 29,426 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:9edfcc76d3b05c5860891ceacaf1- Official record
- Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
316 headPike County · 2022
How calculated
Pike County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
29163:dairy_cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 316 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:9547085eb630358a6922bfe6e3ba- Official record
- Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
720 headPike County · 2022
How calculated
Pike County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
29163:equine:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 720 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:1ed7776eae7707186d56c20e84a1- Official record
- Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.8 reported_hay_acres/reported_headPike County · 2022
How calculated
Pike County · county
Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
29163:forage-production-livestock-context:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- reported_hay_acres/reported_head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:af4f6297e707751253480699eca8- Official record
- Open source ↗
Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.
Comparable market observations
Price intelligence
No defensible Alfalfa benchmark
No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.
Request current local quotes →Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.
Official 1991–2020 normals
Local climate context
Annual precipitation40.6 in
How calculated
BOWLING GREEN 1 E, MO US · nearest station
Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- in
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:6795042c19a0fae9da8519b258c3- Official record
- Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature53.3 °F
How calculated
BOWLING GREEN 1 E, MO US · nearest station
Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- °F
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:bd4cf855f34f201fcf203f5e6394- Official record
- Open source ↗
Station distance6.9 miles
How calculated
BOWLING GREEN 1 E, MO US · nearest station
Great-circle distance from Ashley reference point to the official station.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- miles
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:d10aaedf01e8f96f9a83181029ab- Official record
- Open source ↗
Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.
Environmental pressure
Drought & moisture context
Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
10.3 percentAshley · 2026
How calculated
Ashley · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e- Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:112eeef9b7e605a7c8fb1dae0b61- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percentAshley · 2026
How calculated
Ashley · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e- Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:e96decd9d904035343b3e507d161- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percentAshley · 2026
How calculated
Ashley · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e- Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:1281d809def41538cb0949db03bf- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D0 categoryAshley · 2026
How calculated
Ashley · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e- Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- category
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:04897f3da2197ae81feccdde6d50- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
18.8 0-100Ashley · 2026
How calculated
Ashley · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e- Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:764be5df6dcc6c70b596d2271806- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING categoryAshley · 2026
How calculated
Ashley · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e- Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- category
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:486357b44f79d2d3ac6e10c5d662- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
10 weeksAshley · 2026
How calculated
Ashley · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e- Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- weeks
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:c016bf523360366bb1c356cf5f09- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100Ashley · 2026
How calculated
Ashley · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e- Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-06-09
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:6f9a2eb2d845a37b28792d180886- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
40 0-100Ashley · 2026
How calculated
Ashley · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e- Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-03-03
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:8ca3de2c00db913589a63924c607- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
7.3 0-100Ashley · 2026
How calculated
Ashley · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e- Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-08-04
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:cda3188f4958a70b94021526aaa7- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
29.5 percentAshley · 2026
How calculated
Ashley · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e- Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:86c22f92dd122e52a1757f8683f9- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percentAshley · 2026
How calculated
Ashley · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e- Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:08c67544a33ca690d7975c74aa4b- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.
HayQuotes marketplace
Visible supply & verified demand
Coverage is still developing
No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.
Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool
Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine
No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.
Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes
Quote A
Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload
$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials
Quote B
Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload
$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials
Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph
Strong nearby sourcing candidates
Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.
45.8sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Alfalfa Hay in Beverly, Illinois39.4 mi6,617 ac982. Alfalfa Hay in Kingston, Illinois40.5 mi6,619 ac983. Alfalfa Hay in Griggsville, Illinois41.1 mi6,512 ac96.74. Alfalfa Hay in Baylis, Illinois36.9 mi6,387 ac95.55. Alfalfa Hay in New Salem, Illinois37.2 mi6,332 ac94.96. Alfalfa Hay in Florence, Illinois41.6 mi6,342 ac94.87. Alfalfa Hay in Pearl, Illinois35.4 mi6,278 ac94.48. Alfalfa Hay in Detroit, Illinois38.7 mi6,282 ac94.29. Alfalfa Hay in Richfield, Illinois39.2 mi6,189 ac93.210. Alfalfa Hay in Milton, Illinois37.4 mi6,147 ac92.8Source hay
Need Alfalfa Hay in Ashley?
Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.
Internal market pathways
Continue through the evidence graph
Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.
County and agricultural-region markets
Other strongly supported hay types in Ashley
Barley Hay in Ashley, MissouriContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Ashley, MissouriContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Ashley, MissouriContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Ashley, MissouriContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Ashley, MissouriContextual local forage evidence in this localityGrass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Ashley, MissouriContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail
Methodology & sources
This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.
NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence
EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.
Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.
Generator: max-v1.0 · 73 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.