HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Charleston, Mississippi

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Charleston.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Local mapped footprint0 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth58.4 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence3.6 / 100LOW
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty53.4 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal56.7 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Charleston
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Charleston. The latest 2025 raster shows 0 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 77th percentile among 427 analyzed Mississippi localities and the 16th percentile nationally. Tallahatchie County reports 4,797 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as North Tunica, Mississippi, 52 miles away with 31 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 66.3% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 77th percentile among analyzed Mississippi localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT
Within 25 miles0mapped acres · 0% of radius · 2025

77th percentile among 427 analyzed Mississippi localities · 16th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Charleston · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
0
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
0 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6513a0d5d661a432615507b4c663
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

3.6 / 100 persistence · LOW

2008: 0 acres · 70th regional percentile · 10th national percentile2009: 2 acres · 81st regional percentile · 14th national percentile2010: 0 acres · 82nd regional percentile · 13th national percentile2011: 0 acres · 76th regional percentile · 12th national percentile2012: 0 acres · 67th regional percentile · 11th national percentile2013: 0 acres · 68th regional percentile · 12th national percentile2014: 0 acres · 48th regional percentile · 11th national percentile2015: 0 acres · 72nd regional percentile · 11th national percentile2016: 0 acres · 80th regional percentile · 12th national percentile2017: 0 acres · 88th regional percentile · 11th national percentile2018: 0 acres · 93rd regional percentile · 10th national percentile2019: 0 acres · 88th regional percentile · 7th national percentile2020: 0 acres · 81st regional percentile · 7th national percentile2021: 0 acres · 79th regional percentile · 8th national percentile2022: 0 acres · 87th regional percentile · 7th national percentile2023: 0 acres · 85th regional percentile · 8th national percentile2024: 0 acres · 81st regional percentile · 12th national percentile2025: 0 acres · 77th regional percentile · 16th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

58.4production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
2,185 head

Tallahatchie County · 2022

How calculated

Tallahatchie County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
28135:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2,185 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:058d480fc14a59b179dd1b774972
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
3,106 head

Tallahatchie County · 2022

How calculated

Tallahatchie County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
28135:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3,106 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:faae046d10e6f4d82a9560bdd633
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
- head

Tallahatchie County · 2022

How calculated

Tallahatchie County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
28135:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6ba8befa3faac349eeb25fddbe9a
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
156 head

Tallahatchie County · 2022

How calculated

Tallahatchie County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
28135:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
156 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0d5fa52bc97e6381deae508bddfd
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
1.5 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Tallahatchie County · 2022

How calculated

Tallahatchie County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
28135:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3a4474fa822e8fc66a997346fdab
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
(D) head

Tallahatchie County · 2022

How calculated

Tallahatchie County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
28135:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c5c8cdef15cdf4ed0c1ac933e3af
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
4,797 acres

Tallahatchie County · 2022

How calculated

Tallahatchie County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
28135:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
4,797 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:827b14cf0076b6782542b392a48a
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
56 farms

Tallahatchie County · 2022

How calculated

Tallahatchie County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
28135:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
56 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:70acb2baedc9beb4ec0d99c0b6f3
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
- acres

Tallahatchie County · 2022

How calculated

Tallahatchie County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
28135:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ee6c4263fe842285505d0b4df7f0
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
- farms

Tallahatchie County · 2022

How calculated

Tallahatchie County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
28135:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:638dbb0d31777d562b76db02be0b
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
6,898 tons

Tallahatchie County · 2022

How calculated

Tallahatchie County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
28135:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
6,898 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2cb43f06c82515f32b02f8ace68f
Official record
Open source ↗
Reported YieldHISTORICAL
1.4 tons/acre

Tallahatchie County · 2022

How calculated

Tallahatchie County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
28135:hay:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6c4db92d4c0efee775161d58ff1b
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation56.7 in
How calculated

LAMBERT 1W, MS US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:84d80858ab8da23f9702153c8be6
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature62.5 °F
How calculated

LAMBERT 1W, MS US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:195895aacccbf66afe66e127807c
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance19.1 miles
How calculated

LAMBERT 1W, MS US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Charleston reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:71cdbb98efc06601bcfd4af74997
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Charleston · 2026

How calculated

Charleston · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3b3b3ad69491c93a
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7222b6d2b6343e9d2fb4322499fc
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
66.3 percent

Charleston · 2026

How calculated

Charleston · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3b3b3ad69491c93a
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6934e1ac2ff4f2fdc2d8e66fecff
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Charleston · 2026

How calculated

Charleston · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3b3b3ad69491c93a
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:18c78380025a58edc60238483b71
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D2 category

Charleston · 2026

How calculated

Charleston · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3b3b3ad69491c93a
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d839a63add3a4842496687114f05
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
53.3 0-100

Charleston · 2026

How calculated

Charleston · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3b3b3ad69491c93a
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0a08ff0b44a70bc0c5d6fbb05f0b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Charleston · 2026

How calculated

Charleston · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3b3b3ad69491c93a
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3d28132e9dd0cab26dd86a017d9c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
53 weeks

Charleston · 2026

How calculated

Charleston · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3b3b3ad69491c93a
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:771f065a79fb878d79de72d2c916
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
69.4 0-100

Charleston · 2026

How calculated

Charleston · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3b3b3ad69491c93a
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7dd6d55da6718c3f0c9be49c927a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
72.6 0-100

Charleston · 2026

How calculated

Charleston · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3b3b3ad69491c93a
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ff01b94b205225d1d1662c213406
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
50.6 0-100

Charleston · 2026

How calculated

Charleston · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3b3b3ad69491c93a
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:57836fcbe79cc66ab0bbf31ba97f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
99.4 percent

Charleston · 2026

How calculated

Charleston · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3b3b3ad69491c93a
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:39a7875eae63b184041163b06b11
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
68.7 percent

Charleston · 2026

How calculated

Charleston · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3b3b3ad69491c93a
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4b306329ba0f2e9bfab217792af0
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

53.4sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Alfalfa Hay in North Tunica, Mississippi51.5 mi31 ac97.42. Alfalfa Hay in Tunica, Mississippi50.6 mi30 ac96.43. Alfalfa Hay in White Oak, Mississippi47.1 mi22 ac76.34. Alfalfa Hay in Arkabutla, Mississippi48 mi20 ac71.35. Alfalfa Hay in Coldwater, Mississippi47.4 mi12 ac52.26. Alfalfa Hay in Austin, Mississippi49.2 mi9 ac45.57. Alfalfa Hay in Helena-West Helena, Arkansas48.5 mi5 ac35.28. Alfalfa Hay in Dundee, Mississippi42.6 mi4 ac32.79. Alfalfa Hay in Lula, Mississippi39.2 mi2 ac28.510. Alfalfa Hay in Friars Point, Mississippi41.5 mi2 ac27.9
Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Charleston?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Alfalfa Hay markets in Tallahatchie Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Charleston

Barley Hay in Charleston, MississippiContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Charleston, MississippiContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Charleston, MississippiContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Charleston, MississippiContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Charleston, MississippiContextual local forage evidence in this localityGrass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Charleston, MississippiContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 64 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.