HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Welcome, Minnesota

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Welcome.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Local mapped footprint3,728.2 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth45.4 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence86.7 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty58 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal33.5 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Welcome
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Welcome. The latest 2025 raster shows 3,728 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 8th percentile among 916 analyzed Minnesota localities and the 56th percentile nationally. Martin County reports 1,085 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as New Ulm, Minnesota, 45 miles away with 12,197 mapped acres. The current drought signal is D0 as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 8th percentile among analyzed Minnesota localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT
Within 25 miles3,728mapped acres · 0.297% of radius · 2025

8th percentile among 916 analyzed Minnesota localities · 56th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Welcome · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
16764
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
16764 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4f729083c86ccf64ddb1382dff4f
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

86.7 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 3,351 acres · 12th regional percentile · 56th national percentile2009: 2,917 acres · 12th regional percentile · 56th national percentile2010: 2,528 acres · 13th regional percentile · 53rd national percentile2011: 3,404 acres · 7th regional percentile · 53rd national percentile2012: 2,538 acres · 6th regional percentile · 55th national percentile2013: 2,418 acres · 9th regional percentile · 55th national percentile2014: 2,736 acres · 8th regional percentile · 53rd national percentile2015: 4,021 acres · 10th regional percentile · 57th national percentile2016: 5,060 acres · 10th regional percentile · 59th national percentile2017: 5,175 acres · 10th regional percentile · 60th national percentile2018: 4,542 acres · 10th regional percentile · 58th national percentile2019: 5,710 acres · 10th regional percentile · 60th national percentile2020: 8,455 acres · 13th regional percentile · 64th national percentile2021: 5,923 acres · 13th regional percentile · 62nd national percentile2022: 5,995 acres · 12th regional percentile · 63rd national percentile2023: 3,724 acres · 10th regional percentile · 58th national percentile2024: 2,688 acres · 12th regional percentile · 62nd national percentile2025: 3,728 acres · 9th regional percentile · 56th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

45.4production depth
Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL
1,085 acres

Martin County · 2022

How calculated

Martin County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27091:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,085 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a80d510087084e40503536bc37fa
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL
63 farms

Martin County · 2022

How calculated

Martin County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27091:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
63 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a26beee6eeee537cb62e959ff615
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
- acres

Martin County · 2022

How calculated

Martin County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27091:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e7162b157ef6cddadce6b113e398
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
- farms

Martin County · 2022

How calculated

Martin County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27091:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7ddd951775dbf5d3daedf70c99bb
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL
2,415 tons

Martin County · 2022

How calculated

Martin County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27091:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2,415 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ef18826c21ed433c5e2c34e69899
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL
2.2 tons/acre

Martin County · 2022

How calculated

Martin County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27091:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:87e2e9d2fc863a8bf44476eda224
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
1,697 head

Martin County · 2022

How calculated

Martin County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27091:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,697 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8169f4c266f5ef2a7550d3d1e586
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
12,977 head

Martin County · 2022

How calculated

Martin County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27091:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
12,977 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:903123b2ed3cd827f7cbb2362884
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
665 head

Martin County · 2022

How calculated

Martin County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27091:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
665 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b5c309827aa4fca068ef6d436eed
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
91 head

Martin County · 2022

How calculated

Martin County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27091:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
91 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:318e4501e2d9c8cfe9c3617b1d7c
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.1 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Martin County · 2022

How calculated

Martin County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27091:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:edc6c5d1fb7ccd080f52a6c99d75
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
108 head

Martin County · 2022

How calculated

Martin County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27091:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
108 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5c0b513e8d9a6a40f189c7e83dd5
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation33.5 in
How calculated

FAIRMONT, MN US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3fc34170e0c2bad7ac11cdacae5b
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature46.1 °F
How calculated

FAIRMONT, MN US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7236711459df60b58296f00b55bc
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance7.2 miles
How calculated

FAIRMONT, MN US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Welcome reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:fb2c67ba8c731193d7f61537ad04
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
15.5 percent

Welcome · 2026

How calculated

Welcome · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:36e9b1b95537f50a27df02951b69
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Welcome · 2026

How calculated

Welcome · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2b8eaf76b16e2a0ad2aa01e30a15
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Welcome · 2026

How calculated

Welcome · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6583618591c1b1dcee646eed1984
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D0 category

Welcome · 2026

How calculated

Welcome · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:853e5091aaa804409c7682254033
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
23.1 0-100

Welcome · 2026

How calculated

Welcome · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5cb8e3df9a44236a89613b726ba0
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Welcome · 2026

How calculated

Welcome · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a6cf941bef7dab824c91fb537b8e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
6 weeks

Welcome · 2026

How calculated

Welcome · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f6ae52b030a800e8730c72825c7d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
20 0-100

Welcome · 2026

How calculated

Welcome · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:93c82872d5345b6463246d04e6e3
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
39.8 0-100

Welcome · 2026

How calculated

Welcome · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:59dbc9f1806b1ef144b2b5370b51
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
22 0-100

Welcome · 2026

How calculated

Welcome · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:dafcfb43aee538d7ca61b1b60775
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
14.9 percent

Welcome · 2026

How calculated

Welcome · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2c6021bc675592b53b5ef5f4b201
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Welcome · 2026

How calculated

Welcome · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:17ce777cbcaa7bebcc68f0d2feb2
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

58sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Alfalfa Hay in New Ulm, Minnesota45.1 mi12,197 ac97.72. Alfalfa Hay in Courtland, Minnesota44.1 mi11,996 ac96.63. Alfalfa Hay in Searles, Minnesota39.9 mi11,485 ac93.64. Alfalfa Hay in Essig, Minnesota45.7 mi10,759 ac88.95. Alfalfa Hay in Cobden, Minnesota44.2 mi10,638 ac88.26. Alfalfa Hay in Sleepy Eye, Minnesota44.1 mi9,824 ac83.27. Alfalfa Hay in Springfield, Minnesota43.6 mi9,230 ac79.68. Alfalfa Hay in Hanska, Minnesota33.8 mi9,145 ac79.59. Alfalfa Hay in North Mankato, Minnesota45.5 mi9,060 ac78.410. Alfalfa Hay in Skyline, Minnesota43.5 mi8,669 ac76.1
Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Welcome?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Alfalfa Hay markets in Martin Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Welcome

Barley Hay in Welcome, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Welcome, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Welcome, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Welcome, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Welcome, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityGrass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Welcome, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 70 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.