Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Walker, Minnesota

Name: Alfalfa market intelligence for Walker, Minnesota
Creator: HayQuotes
License: https://hayquotes.com/terms

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Walker.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Walker

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT

Local mapped footprint4,634.9 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth45.9 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence82.9 / 100HIGH

Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS

Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS

Sourcing difficulty58.3 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal28 in1991–2020 NORMAL

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Walker

Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Walker. The latest 2025 raster shows 4,635 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 11th percentile among 916 analyzed Minnesota localities and the 60th percentile nationally. Cass County reports 8,529 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Deer Creek, Minnesota, 60 miles away with 45,482 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 100% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED

Local supplyMODERATE

Nearby sourcingSTRONG

Drought pressureMODERATE

MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 11th percentile among analyzed Minnesota localities.

Trace this statement

usda-cdl-2025-30m

Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT

5 mi

17 ac

10 mi

692 ac

25 mi

4,635 ac

50 mi

40,386 ac

100 mi

247,327 ac

150 mi

478,212 ac

250 mi

1,203,907 ac

Within 25 miles4,635mapped acres · 0.369% of radius · 2025

11th percentile among 916 analyzed Minnesota localities · 60th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Walker · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source: usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot: usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record: 20841
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2025-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 20841 classified pixels
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:19c9861700207af60274fb1e123e
Official record: Open source ↗

Footprint history

82.9 / 100 persistence · HIGH

20082025

Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

45.9production depth

Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL

8,529 acres

Cass County · 2022

How calculated

Cass County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 27021:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 8,529 acres
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:fe65747aa462657ee83de1351d31
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL

129 farms

Cass County · 2022

How calculated

Cass County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 27021:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 129 farms
Normalized unit: farms
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:25b7a716cc720ff4324ca2ef2aa6
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL

(D) acres

Cass County · 2022

How calculated

Cass County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 27021:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: (D) acres
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:780876ed73a758aa535d7b825098
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL

1 farms

Cass County · 2022

How calculated

Cass County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 27021:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 1 farms
Normalized unit: farms
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:7e7a2a18c41473d52fb9d3bbc21b
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL

14,314 tons

Cass County · 2022

How calculated

Cass County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 27021:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 14,314 tons
Normalized unit: tons
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:5d4ddfc7f763eed553d1a7dcc2bb
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL

1.7 tons/acre

Cass County · 2022

How calculated

Cass County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 27021:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: tons/acre
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:78e582d94cfa02791581d898427a
Official record: Open source ↗

Beef CattleHISTORICAL

8,782 head

Cass County · 2022

How calculated

Cass County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 27021:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 8,782 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:47937473ec295069e513b0583d6b
Official record: Open source ↗

CattleHISTORICAL

15,184 head

Cass County · 2022

How calculated

Cass County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 27021:cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 15,184 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:9a4791c92b5971610a62ee896d87
Official record: Open source ↗

Dairy CattleHISTORICAL

90 head

Cass County · 2022

How calculated

Cass County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 27021:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 90 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:8d7450719857b482ba42fb214dc5
Official record: Open source ↗

EquineHISTORICAL

767 head

Cass County · 2022

How calculated

Cass County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 27021:equine:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 767 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:a9331610fafce18a424f571f1f27
Official record: Open source ↗

Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL

1.9 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Cass County · 2022

How calculated

Cass County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 27021:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:7ec60bec17ed2cf2bbbfe79a5e43
Official record: Open source ↗

GoatsHISTORICAL

408 head

Cass County · 2022

How calculated

Cass County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 27021:goats:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 408 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:61695212bceb47a6b46cd9af50bf
Official record: Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation28 in

How calculated

WALKER, MN US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: in
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:3641e4e4895461cbfe8b72ad5c98
Official record: Open source ↗

Annual mean temperature41.6 °F

How calculated

WALKER, MN US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: °F
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:ecdeddf9e4f7b0c6a639d007ac9d
Official record: Open source ↗

Station distance0.6 miles

How calculated

WALKER, MN US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Walker reference point to the official station.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: miles
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:d7fbfbdd65e567f858d5fef533e9
Official record: Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST

100 percent

Walker · 2026

How calculated

Walker · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record: drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:cc0efb35c5593df309acd0665af3
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST

100 percent

Walker · 2026

How calculated

Walker · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record: drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:49c4a86477bedb1a4381b33f7d46
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST

0 percent

Walker · 2026

How calculated

Walker · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record: drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:5e3cccb92f9abceb80d826920fd0
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST

D2 category

Walker · 2026

How calculated

Walker · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record: drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: category
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:0f6cf6e720f19fb71b5bd5eea9bf
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST

60 0-100

Walker · 2026

How calculated

Walker · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record: drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:a8d33fa8f89715e22ffe20c2c955
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Four Week TrendLATEST

STABLE category

Walker · 2026

How calculated

Walker · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record: drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: category
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:08cf7ee9c8a456c7dc4621366f78
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST

48 weeks

Walker · 2026

How calculated

Walker · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record: drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: weeks
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:67a6fefd6e9ed1ad0bcab51d2f39
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST

59.4 0-100

Walker · 2026

How calculated

Walker · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record: drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-06-09
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:c6c5d0582193e5a892c76d31120f
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST

38.7 0-100

Walker · 2026

How calculated

Walker · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record: drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-03-03
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:66524689894bf2498676ce46872d
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST

60 0-100

Walker · 2026

How calculated

Walker · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record: drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-08-04
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:56ece60ec75f5159c71ed11f780d
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST

86.4 percent

Walker · 2026

How calculated

Walker · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record: drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:6ba9b55aa80a2f2a213fb1397757
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST

24.1 percent

Walker · 2026

How calculated

Walker · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record: drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:301b1e31afda061c0f6a114098a3
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.

Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Bale countWeight per bale (lb)

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Pickup price / baleLoaded route milesFreight / loaded mileUnloading totalStacking totalOther chargesPayload / load

Delivered total$0.00

Delivered equivalent—

Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Pickup price / baleLoaded route milesFreight / loaded mileUnloading totalStacking totalOther chargesPayload / load

Delivered total$0.00

Delivered equivalent—

Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.

Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

58.3sourcing difficulty

Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength

1. Alfalfa Hay in Deer Creek, Minnesota59.6 mi45,482 ac97 2. Alfalfa Hay in New York Mills, Minnesota54.2 mi44,506 ac95.7 3. Alfalfa Hay in Bluffton, Minnesota52.7 mi43,789 ac94.6 4. Alfalfa Hay in Wadena, Minnesota51.3 mi42,564 ac92.6 5. Alfalfa Hay in Hewitt, Minnesota58.1 mi41,665 ac90.8 6. Alfalfa Hay in Perham, Minnesota57.8 mi41,560 ac90.6 7. Alfalfa Hay in Bertha, Minnesota61.2 mi40,084 ac88 8. Alfalfa Hay in Verndale, Minnesota52 mi38,114 ac85.2 9. Alfalfa Hay in Sebeka, Minnesota39.7 mi34,138 ac79.3 10. Alfalfa Hay in Frazee, Minnesota58.4 mi34,632 ac79.2

Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Walker?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Alfalfa Hay markets in Cass Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Walker

Barley Hay in Walker, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Bermudagrass Hay in Walker, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Brome Hay in Walker, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Clover Hay in Walker, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Fescue Hay in Walker, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Walker, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this locality

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station

1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗

National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics

rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter

202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level

2022countyOfficial source ↗

Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 70 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.

Alfalfa Hayin Walker, Minnesota

What the local hay data shows

What the evidence says now

Local alfalfa footprint

Footprint history

Production & livestock context

Price intelligence

Local climate context

Drought & moisture context

Visible supply & verified demand

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

Quote A

Quote B

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Need Alfalfa Hay in Walker?

Continue through the evidence graph

County and agricultural-region markets

Other strongly supported hay types in Walker

Methodology & sources

Alfalfa Hay
in Walker, Minnesota