Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Lake Park, Minnesota

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Lake Park.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT
Local mapped footprint27,369.9 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth85.1 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence90.7 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty38.8 / 100LOW

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal29.4 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Lake Park. The latest 2025 raster shows 27,370 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 78th percentile among 916 analyzed Minnesota localities and the 91st percentile nationally. Becker County reports 23,909 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Deer Creek, Minnesota, 50 miles away with 45,482 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 59.7% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 78th percentile among analyzed Minnesota localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT

Footprint history

90.7 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 26,809 acres · 69th regional percentile · 87th national percentile2009: 25,278 acres · 71st regional percentile · 87th national percentile2010: 20,236 acres · 69th regional percentile · 82nd national percentile2011: 49,195 acres · 70th regional percentile · 93rd national percentile2012: 43,754 acres · 71st regional percentile · 92nd national percentile2013: 38,032 acres · 75th regional percentile · 92nd national percentile2014: 56,646 acres · 77th regional percentile · 95th national percentile2015: 51,553 acres · 72nd regional percentile · 93rd national percentile2016: 48,767 acres · 70th regional percentile · 92nd national percentile2017: 52,873 acres · 75th regional percentile · 94th national percentile2018: 48,081 acres · 69th regional percentile · 93rd national percentile2019: 45,620 acres · 73rd regional percentile · 92nd national percentile2020: 49,191 acres · 74th regional percentile · 92nd national percentile2021: 40,443 acres · 76th regional percentile · 90th national percentile2022: 40,106 acres · 74th regional percentile · 91st national percentile2023: 39,675 acres · 81st regional percentile · 91st national percentile2024: 25,850 acres · 80th regional percentile · 92nd national percentile2025: 27,370 acres · 78th regional percentile · 91st national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

85.1production depth
Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL
23,909 acres

Becker County · 2022

How calculated

Becker County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27005:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
23,909 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e5d90904a5396f1292fe80d18aff
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL
302 farms

Becker County · 2022

How calculated

Becker County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27005:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
302 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b1bb3e1161097b5dbdbc26a273f1
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
452 acres

Becker County · 2022

How calculated

Becker County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27005:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
452 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:cd624b242f062d184c42a230f71a
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
7 farms

Becker County · 2022

How calculated

Becker County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27005:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
7 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7683978f07b94560e11c338437b2
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
1.9 percent

Becker County · 2022

How calculated

Becker County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27005:alfalfa:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bfb1d49a79875b0ef124e2bd05b5
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL
57,250 tons

Becker County · 2022

How calculated

Becker County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27005:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
57,250 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:43e964903532f2aff8e8a7b8a6c6
Official record
Open source ↗
Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL
2.4 tons/acre

Becker County · 2022

How calculated

Becker County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27005:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8aeece81cee97307e4aa49275d8f
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
7,232 head

Becker County · 2022

How calculated

Becker County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27005:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
7,232 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:24845bc20208a2c11880006a2aea
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
30,827 head

Becker County · 2022

How calculated

Becker County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27005:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
30,827 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:df5779fca5ddaa361b5e443a2242
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
8,461 head

Becker County · 2022

How calculated

Becker County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27005:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
8,461 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:849ccbef4263885c30923b35dfe5
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
504 head

Becker County · 2022

How calculated

Becker County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27005:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
504 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:12730db719f1a5bf79a0db8d62e3
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
1 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Becker County · 2022

How calculated

Becker County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27005:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:47a6ef210027d57ef1036d671bda
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation29.5 in
How calculated

DETROIT LAKES 1 NNE, MN US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0e15a78503f9c0937b2c3ea07a11
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature40.1 °F
How calculated

DETROIT LAKES 1 NNE, MN US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:cd7e0586974614dae58994389a46
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance12.7 miles
How calculated

DETROIT LAKES 1 NNE, MN US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Lake Park reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:be97ab1a2b2121adf3883e6a4b96
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Lake Park · 2026

How calculated

Lake Park · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6fa7c9c50dd590a86c04d5121102
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
59.7 percent

Lake Park · 2026

How calculated

Lake Park · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6ce6307ade2d121b9561f751bffd
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Lake Park · 2026

How calculated

Lake Park · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7cb72bf0bac984fe62b24c1e19bd
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D2 category

Lake Park · 2026

How calculated

Lake Park · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5cdffcc0285d9dbae6d9da229d1a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
51.9 0-100

Lake Park · 2026

How calculated

Lake Park · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0ccb9463dcb69b76b35241153251
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Lake Park · 2026

How calculated

Lake Park · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:14222ea84071f2ac66f0454c4b67
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
26 weeks

Lake Park · 2026

How calculated

Lake Park · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:129eb4dc6383889a36b14391e623
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
32.2 0-100

Lake Park · 2026

How calculated

Lake Park · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:450094fde1e0418033a573d8f04c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
34.6 0-100

Lake Park · 2026

How calculated

Lake Park · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:dc9941b8fa0b5f18bcb57166611b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
43.6 0-100

Lake Park · 2026

How calculated

Lake Park · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0240e4d6838405cea5407cc2c42f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
53.9 percent

Lake Park · 2026

How calculated

Lake Park · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2be8a642a457a63764dedf7dfd61
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
4.2 percent

Lake Park · 2026

How calculated

Lake Park · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:be2d0b8fe80687013272af4a4309
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

38.8sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Lake Park?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 72 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.