Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Alfalfa Hay
in Fisher, Minnesota

Name: Alfalfa market intelligence for Fisher, Minnesota
Creator: HayQuotes
License: https://hayquotes.com/terms

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Alfalfa hay serving Fisher.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Fisher

Evidence strength75/ 100 · EXACT

Local mapped footprint11,127.5 acres within 25 miEXACT

Alfalfa

Production depth59.6 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence86.3 / 100HIGH

Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS

Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS

Sourcing difficulty51.8 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal22.4 in1991–2020 NORMAL

Request Alfalfa Hay Quotes Sell Alfalfa Near Fisher

Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA crop mapping directly identifies alfalfa around Fisher. The latest 2025 raster shows 11,128 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 34th percentile among 916 analyzed Minnesota localities and the 75th percentile nationally. Polk County reports 16,789 acres of reported alfalfa acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as McIntosh, Minnesota, 44 miles away with 26,722 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 80.6% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED

Local supplyMODERATE

Nearby sourcingSTRONG

Drought pressureMODERATE

MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa footprint ranks at the 34th percentile among analyzed Minnesota localities.

Trace this statement

usda-cdl-2025-30m

Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

EXACT

5 mi

281 ac

10 mi

947 ac

25 mi

11,128 ac

50 mi

54,835 ac

100 mi

208,394 ac

150 mi

400,268 ac

250 mi

1,168,036 ac

Within 25 miles11,128mapped acres · 0.886% of radius · 2025

34th percentile among 916 analyzed Minnesota localities · 75th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Fisher · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source: usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot: usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record: 50035
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2025-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 50035 classified pixels
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:0ddd69179a9874b6efdbfb2b08de
Official record: Open source ↗

Footprint history

86.3 / 100 persistence · HIGH

20082025

Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

59.6production depth

Alfalfa AcresHISTORICAL

16,789 acres

Polk County · 2022

How calculated

Polk County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 27119:alfalfa_acres:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 16,789 acres
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:d277051319a45de13cc51aa5c73c
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa FarmsHISTORICAL

201 farms

Polk County · 2022

How calculated

Polk County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 27119:alfalfa_farms:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 201 farms
Normalized unit: farms
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:28a287f58f59072b0a318c62773f
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL

18 acres

Polk County · 2022

How calculated

Polk County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 27119:alfalfa_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 18 acres
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:11089256889ec046579f470c8afb
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL

3 farms

Polk County · 2022

How calculated

Polk County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 27119:alfalfa_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 3 farms
Normalized unit: farms
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:b248f8f42887624b387f383bfdec
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL

0.1 percent

Polk County · 2022

How calculated

Polk County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 27119:alfalfa:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:fbf84d9cdc431a58bf01eafde4da
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa ProductionHISTORICAL

54,817 tons

Polk County · 2022

How calculated

Polk County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 27119:alfalfa_production:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 54,817 tons
Normalized unit: tons
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:306e8cf3e06ffc413a75c6fa4c8a
Official record: Open source ↗

Alfalfa Reported YieldHISTORICAL

3.3 tons/acre

Polk County · 2022

How calculated

Polk County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 27119:alfalfa:reported-yield:2022
Evidence: EXACT
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: tons/acre
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:e14015ba0bcae476b03641643759
Official record: Open source ↗

Beef CattleHISTORICAL

5,981 head

Polk County · 2022

How calculated

Polk County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 27119:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 5,981 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:c3d2b593822e15c23e97d061a811
Official record: Open source ↗

CattleHISTORICAL

13,468 head

Polk County · 2022

How calculated

Polk County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 27119:cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 13,468 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:f862f97473755f42914bb158879a
Official record: Open source ↗

Dairy CattleHISTORICAL

958 head

Polk County · 2022

How calculated

Polk County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 27119:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 958 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:e096502818f09e6deae952079913
Official record: Open source ↗

EquineHISTORICAL

566 head

Polk County · 2022

How calculated

Polk County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 27119:equine:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 566 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:2f9ec20e82c5079fe2ce742bd781
Official record: Open source ↗

Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL

1.2 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Polk County · 2022

How calculated

Polk County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 27119:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:951b52f6def1329996ad6db9635b
Official record: Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Alfalfa benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation22.4 in

How calculated

CROOKSTON NW EXP STN, MN US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: in
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:6c89c99045f5b4bd0637490a03f6
Official record: Open source ↗

Annual mean temperature40.1 °F

How calculated

CROOKSTON NW EXP STN, MN US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: °F
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:e74de2c3a8b7cc603fcca3881802
Official record: Open source ↗

Station distance8.7 miles

How calculated

CROOKSTON NW EXP STN, MN US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Fisher reference point to the official station.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: miles
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:2fdb5e5c893cf3266205cd89e24b
Official record: Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST

100 percent

Fisher · 2026

How calculated

Fisher · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record: drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:ccca5dbe1de5890d6d82d09450a0
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST

80.6 percent

Fisher · 2026

How calculated

Fisher · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record: drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:1eed17be465cd31bf55e9ad5c7cd
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST

13 percent

Fisher · 2026

How calculated

Fisher · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record: drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:b8776671900f8efe446febc91841
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST

D2 category

Fisher · 2026

How calculated

Fisher · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record: drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: category
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:54b8e729de6e65597b1fb5337204
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST

58.7 0-100

Fisher · 2026

How calculated

Fisher · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record: drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:8b0edaaa70fa2d33983e094b5a2e
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Four Week TrendLATEST

WORSENING category

Fisher · 2026

How calculated

Fisher · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record: drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: category
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:60bb74cd9f9a602cde4ff1ea3758
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST

6 weeks

Fisher · 2026

How calculated

Fisher · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record: drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: weeks
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:250cf71710b93e3bd9b6e7db6991
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST

20.1 0-100

Fisher · 2026

How calculated

Fisher · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record: drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-06-09
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:d68386ff977f8543ae398292cc48
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST

12.8 0-100

Fisher · 2026

How calculated

Fisher · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record: drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-03-03
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:36bd5e8d974e3a808acd615d139e
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST

41.5 0-100

Fisher · 2026

How calculated

Fisher · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record: drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-08-04
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:d9e03ecb26582d031191570ffdb3
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST

12 percent

Fisher · 2026

How calculated

Fisher · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record: drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:372ab86d71cf1ef61f9bfd4271d2
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST

3.9 percent

Fisher · 2026

How calculated

Fisher · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record: drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:17e22d4ae9cf75bb52ed313c5c5f
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.

Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Bale countWeight per bale (lb)

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Pickup price / baleLoaded route milesFreight / loaded mileUnloading totalStacking totalOther chargesPayload / load

Delivered total$0.00

Delivered equivalent—

Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Pickup price / baleLoaded route milesFreight / loaded mileUnloading totalStacking totalOther chargesPayload / load

Delivered total$0.00

Delivered equivalent—

Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.

Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

51.8sourcing difficulty

Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength

1. Alfalfa Hay in McIntosh, Minnesota43.9 mi26,722 ac97.8 2. Alfalfa Hay in Brooks, Minnesota37 mi24,713 ac92.5 3. Alfalfa Hay in Ulen, Minnesota55.9 mi25,001 ac92.4 4. Alfalfa Hay in Fosston, Minnesota50.9 mi24,855 ac92.2 5. Alfalfa Hay in Lengby, Minnesota57.7 mi24,720 ac91.5 6. Alfalfa Hay in Erskine, Minnesota37.6 mi24,155 ac90.9 7. Alfalfa Hay in Thief River Falls, Minnesota36 mi23,809 ac90 8. Alfalfa Hay in Oklee, Minnesota44.2 mi23,702 ac89.3 9. Alfalfa Hay in Winger, Minnesota42 mi23,359 ac88.5 10. Alfalfa Hay in Bejou, Minnesota45.7 mi23,158 ac87.7

Source hay

Need Alfalfa Hay in Fisher?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Alfalfa Hay Quotes

Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Alfalfa Hay markets in Polk Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Fisher

Barley Hay in Fisher, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Bermudagrass Hay in Fisher, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Brome Hay in Fisher, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Clover Hay in Fisher, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Fescue Hay in Fisher, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Fisher, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this locality

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station

1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗

National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics

rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter

202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level

2022countyOfficial source ↗

Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records identify Alfalfa Hay in this area. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 72 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.

Alfalfa Hayin Fisher, Minnesota

What the local hay data shows

What the evidence says now

Local alfalfa footprint

Footprint history

Production & livestock context

Price intelligence

Local climate context

Drought & moisture context

Visible supply & verified demand

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

Quote A

Quote B

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Need Alfalfa Hay in Fisher?

Continue through the evidence graph

County and agricultural-region markets

Other strongly supported hay types in Fisher

Methodology & sources

Alfalfa Hay
in Fisher, Minnesota